Stablecoin Inflows Hit $98B as Crypto Market Faces Liquidity Crunch

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-06

Анотація

Amidst a crypto market sell-off and liquidity crunch, stablecoin inflows to exchanges have surged to $98 billion, doubling from previous levels and exceeding the 90-day average of $89 billion. This significant capital deployment is seen as a positive sign, indicating returning investor interest and a potential readiness to buy the dip. However, robust selling pressure persists, and the overall stablecoin market cap has declined slightly. The market remains fragile, with Bitcoin experiencing a sharp correction.

An analyst, Darkfost from CryptoQuant, has shared that at a time when crypto sell-offs boost, the inflows of stablecoin to exchanges have double-folded to $98 billion from the last levels.

The increase of stablecoin inflows has crossed the 90-day average of $89 billion. The analyst further notes in the blog that this indicates that capital deployment has boosted in the past few weeks and the market clearly needs it. Even so, the selling pressure remains very robust to be completely absorbed.

In the current scenario, the crypto market is going through a delicate phase indicated by a structural lack of liquidity at the time of persistently high volatility. BTC plunged more than 10% towards $64,000 on February 6 and is gradually moving towards 50% correction from its October all-time high.

The drop has taken BTC to its lowest level since late 2024 and has reversed momentum that had built after Donald Trump’s election win, when he indicated a more supportive stance on crypto at the time of the campaign trail.

The Positive Sign for the Market

The analyst has referred to the surge in stablecoin inflows as a positive sign, as it reveals increasing investor interest in having exposure to the market. Besides this, it indicates that the capital is starting to return to the virtual asset space.

The dynamics still need to be robust; however, some participants are so far purchasing this dip.

Mainly, choose mid-cap stablecoins such as USDS and USD1 carried on to gain share; at the same time, overall stablecoin market capitalisation slipped 1.0% WoW to $305.1 billion, influenced by carried-on supply contraction in USDT and USDC, as per Messari.

Tether (USDT), the biggest stablecoin by market capitalisation, increased to $0.99 in the last 24 hours, having $257.45 billion in volume, a 60% surge.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Senator Cynthia Lummis Urges Banks to Adopt Stablecoins and Crypto Payments

TagsBitcoinCrypto MarketStablecoin

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the significance of the $98 billion stablecoin inflows to exchanges according to the CryptoQuant analyst?

AThe $98 billion stablecoin inflows, which doubled from previous levels and exceeded the 90-day average of $89 billion, indicate increased capital deployment and growing investor interest in the crypto market, though selling pressure remains strong.

QHow has the current liquidity crunch affected Bitcoin's price as mentioned in the article?

ABitcoin plunged over 10% to around $64,000 on February 6 and is moving toward a 50% correction from its October all-time high, reaching its lowest level since late 2024 due to structural lack of liquidity and high volatility.

QWhich stablecoins gained market share despite the overall stablecoin market capitalization decline?

AMid-cap stablecoins such as USDS and USD1 gained market share, while the overall stablecoin market capitalization fell 1.0% week-over-week to $305.1 billion due to supply contraction in USDT and USDC.

QWhat recent political event was mentioned as initially boosting crypto momentum before the reversal?

AThe momentum had built after Donald Trump's election win, when he indicated a more supportive stance on crypto during his campaign trail, but this momentum has since reversed.

QHow did Tether (USDT) perform in the last 24 hours according to the article?

ATether (USDT) increased to $0.99 in the last 24 hours, with a volume of $257.45 billion, representing a 60% surge.

Пов'язані матеріали

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit8 хв тому

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit8 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片