South Korea Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $42B Bithumb Mishap

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-04-13Востаннє оновлено о 2026-04-13

Анотація

South Korea's central bank has recommended implementing cryptocurrency exchange "circuit breakers" following a major incident on Bithumb. In February, the exchange erroneously distributed 620,000 Bitcoin (worth approximately $42 billion) to customers instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won (about $400). This triggered panic selling, causing Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet. Although Bithumb quickly halted trading and reversed the transactions, nearly $125 million in Bitcoin had already been sold. The Bank of Korea's report emphasizes that the crypto sector lacks the stringent internal controls of traditional finance and calls for mandatory systems to detect and prevent such human errors and discrepancies in asset records. This proposal is part of broader legislative moves in South Korea to enhance the security and transparency of virtual asset exchanges.

To avoid a recurrence of the market chaos that ensued in February when Bithumb accidentally delivered over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its clients, the South Korean central bank has suggested that cryptocurrency exchanges have “circuit breakers” that temporarily suspend trade.

In a payments report released on Monday, the Bank of Korea suggested that legislators think about implementing measures to halt trading in cryptocurrency in the event of unexpected price fluctuations, much as the trading limitations implemented by the Korea Exchange.

Stringent Protocols

According to the bank, the virtual asset sector is currently not well-regulated and does not have the same internal control procedures as more traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the research concluded, stronger applicable policies are required to proactively avoid such instances, as they may happen at other virtual asset exchanges.

This comes at a time when politicians in South Korea are trying to enact legislation that would further regulate cryptocurrency. The Bank of Korea has said that these regulations should include its recommendations to make virtual asset exchange activities more secure and transparent.

Rather than 620,000 Korean won, which was about $400, Bithumb mistakenly transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, which was valued around $42 billion at the time, to clients in early February. According to the bank’s assessment, the price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as consumers hurried to sell, which in turn caused others to panic-sell, further lowering its price.

Within minutes, Bithumb stopped trading and reversed their Bitcoin transfers. However, the exchange clarified that 1,788 BTC, or almost $125 million, had already been sold before it could take any action, and it made up the difference using corporate reserves.

Crypto exchanges should be obligated to have systems that can identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, according to the Bank of Korea. It went on to say that exchanges should also be able to detect and report differences between a platform’s internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did the Bank of Korea propose to prevent a recurrence of the Bithumb mishap?

AThe Bank of Korea proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges implement 'circuit breakers' to temporarily suspend trade in the event of unexpected price fluctuations.

QWhat was the nature of the error that Bithumb made in February?

ABithumb accidentally transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $42 billion, to its clients instead of 620,000 Korean won (about $400).

QWhat was the market impact of Bithumb's erroneous transfer?

AThe price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as customers hurried to sell the mistakenly received funds, which triggered panic-selling and further drove down the price.

QAccording to the Bank of Korea, why is the virtual asset sector particularly vulnerable to such incidents?

AThe Bank of Korea stated that the virtual asset sector is not well-regulated and lacks the same internal control procedures as traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific systems did the Bank of Korea suggest exchanges be obligated to have?

AThe Bank of Korea suggested exchanges should have systems to identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, and to detect and report differences between a platform's internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Пов'язані матеріали

AWS Accounts for 60% of Operating Profit, Amazon Delivers Q2 Results with No Weak Spots

Amazon reported its Q2 2026 financial results, with total sales reaching $200.6 billion, maintaining year-over-year growth. Net profit was $62.6 billion, significantly boosted by a $53.4 billion non-operating pre-tax gain primarily from its investment in AI company Anthropic. The more indicative operating profit was $27.5 billion. Amazon Web Services (AWS) was the key profit driver, contributing 60.5% of the company's operating profit. AWS revenue grew 36.8% year-over-year, with its operating profit rising nearly two-thirds. This growth provides crucial financial support for Amazon's broader investments in retail and infrastructure. Other segments also showed solid performance. Advertising revenue grew 26.2%, while third-party seller services and online stores maintained positive momentum, strengthening the core retail business. Despite strong profits, Amazon's trailing twelve-month (TTM) free cash flow turned negative, as $169 billion in property and equipment investments (largely for data centers and AI) outpaced $161.4 billion in operating cash flow. This highlights the company's heavy ongoing capital expenditure, even as investment gains inflate net income. The results present a dual picture: robust operational earnings led by AWS alongside massive reinvestment into future growth, particularly in AI infrastructure.

marsbit2 хв тому

AWS Accounts for 60% of Operating Profit, Amazon Delivers Q2 Results with No Weak Spots

marsbit2 хв тому

With Two Consecutive Quarters of Losses, Coinbase Must Rely on Paths Beyond Trading

Coinbase posted its second consecutive quarterly net loss of $359 million on $1.22 billion in revenue for Q2, highlighting its vulnerability to crypto market cycles where weaker prices and lower volatility reduce user trading. However, the report also reveals a strategic shift in its business model. Despite a 25% quarter-over-quarter decline in global spot trading volume, Coinbase increased its market share to a company-record 10.3%. This suggests its position as a compliant U.S. on-ramp is strengthening even in a cooler market. A key development is the diversification of revenue streams. Transaction revenue fell to $599 million, nearly equaling subscription and services revenue of $555 million. Stablecoin services, generating $292 million, are becoming a crucial revenue "floor." This income, derived from interest on the $20 billion average USDC balance held on its platform, is less tied to daily trading activity. Furthermore, while spot trading volume dropped significantly, derivatives volume held steady at $1.03 trillion. Coinbase is pushing to integrate spot, stablecoin, and derivatives liquidity to create a more interconnected and sticky ecosystem for users. The GAAP net loss includes non-cash expenses like stock-based compensation and crypto asset valuation changes. Its adjusted EBITDA remained positive at $208 million for the 14th straight quarter, indicating core operations can cover ongoing costs. The company is also reducing expenses to manage the downturn. The central question moving forward is whether Coinbase's growing market share, stablecoin revenues, and expanding product integration can sufficiently offset the inherent cyclicality of its core trading business during future market contractions.

marsbit11 хв тому

With Two Consecutive Quarters of Losses, Coinbase Must Rely on Paths Beyond Trading

marsbit11 хв тому

June Quarter for Earth's Most Valuable Tech Company: Apple's Revenue Breaks $100 Billion for the First Time

On July 30, Apple announced its quarterly results, with revenue surpassing the $100 billion mark for the first time in a June quarter, reaching $109.4 billion—a 16.4% year-over-year increase. This record performance was driven by all-time highs for the period in iPhone, Mac, and Services sales. Key to this growth was the iPhone, which accounted for nearly two-thirds of the $15.4 billion revenue increase compared to the same period last year. Both Europe and Greater China contributed significantly, with the latter seeing 22.4% growth. While Services revenue represented only 28.1% of total revenue, it contributed 42.4% of gross profit due to its high 75.6% gross margin, acting as a profit stabilizer alongside the hardware surge. Notably, EPS grew 28.7%, faster than revenue. However, Apple disclosed that a one-time tariff refund added approximately 2 percentage points to the gross margin and $0.11 to EPS. Excluding this impact, the adjusted EPS growth rate would be approximately 21.7%. This distinction highlights two separate dynamics: operational growth from core businesses and a temporary boost to profitability. The report ultimately paints a picture of broad-based growth, with hardware driving scale, Services enhancing profitability, and a one-time item influencing the profit growth rate.

marsbit11 хв тому

June Quarter for Earth's Most Valuable Tech Company: Apple's Revenue Breaks $100 Billion for the First Time

marsbit11 хв тому

In the Age of Artificial Intelligence, We Need 'Magicians,' Not 'Managers'

In the AI era, leadership must shift from management to magic. As knowledge rapidly expires, value shifts from what leaders know to what they can facilitate. Traditional "inside-out" management, driven by internal experience, is giving way to "outside-in" thinking focused on external opportunities, customer needs, and disruptive change. The core challenge is fostering new ideas that may invalidate existing knowledge. While technologies like steam, electricity, and AI provide the "skeleton" for innovation, it is human vision—connecting technology to customer dreams—that creates magic. Historical figures like Richard Arkwright and Eldridge R. Johnson succeeded not by inventing core technologies, but by reimagining work and business models from the outside in. Leaders must transition from controllers to "architects of flourishing." Their role is to design environments where empowerment, creativity, and adaptive learning thrive. This involves granting autonomy, fostering partnerships, and building resilient systems that scale innovation. Critical leadership qualities now include judgment, creativity, and the ability to learn continuously rather than relying on static expertise. Therefore, cultivating future leaders requires a focus on timeless fundamentals, humanities for broader perspective, and social acuity, rather than over-specialization in quickly outdated technical skills. The future rewards those who respond to the unseen and create conditions for better answers to emerge. Leadership in the AI age is less about having all the answers and more about enabling others to discover them—creating organizations where people explore, imagine, and thrive.

marsbit46 хв тому

In the Age of Artificial Intelligence, We Need 'Magicians,' Not 'Managers'

marsbit46 хв тому

The End of This Bull Market's 'Greatest Myth': 'AI Stock God' Leopold Crushed in Weeks, Citadel Takes Over $16 Billion in Stock Assets

The once-celebrated "AI stock god," 24-year-old Leopold Aschenbrenner, has seen his hedge fund's spectacular rise end in a dramatic collapse. His fund, Situational Awareness (SA), built a narrative around explosive AI infrastructure demand, raising $45 billion and achieving a 439% return in H1 2026 by heavily leveraging (4x) concentrated long positions in stocks like SK Hynix and CoreWeave, while shorting legacy software firms. In July 2026, a sharp reversal hit AI stocks, triggering massive losses in both long and short positions. Facing margin calls from banks, SA was forced to sell its entire $16 billion public market portfolio in a 36-hour fire sale. Citadel acquired the assets at a significant discount, one of Wall Street's largest emergency stock trades. SA's assets under management plummeted from a $45 billion peak to roughly $10 billion, retained entirely in private holdings like a stake in Anthropic. The episode underscores that being right on a macro trend does not guarantee survival, highlighting the critical risks of extreme concentration and high leverage without a sufficient buffer against market shifts.

marsbit1 год тому

The End of This Bull Market's 'Greatest Myth': 'AI Stock God' Leopold Crushed in Weeks, Citadel Takes Over $16 Billion in Stock Assets

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот