South Korea Crypto Bill Stalls Amid Stablecoin Rule Disputes

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-30Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-30

Анотація

South Korea's Digital Asset Basic Act, a key piece of cryptocurrency legislation, has been delayed into next year due to a policy deadlock among regulators. The primary disagreement centers on stablecoin regulations, specifically over which entities should be permitted to issue them. The Bank of Korea advocates for banks to be the primary, if not exclusive, issuers to protect monetary stability. In contrast, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) opposes rigid rules that could exclude non-bank fintech companies, arguing it would stifle competition and innovation. Further tensions exist over the oversight structure for these assets. Despite this regulatory slowdown, the country shows signs of a broader crypto thaw, including lifted investment restrictions for venture capital firms and Binance's re-entry into the market.

A major hurdle has been thrown in South Korea’s quest to give its digital assets regulatory oversight, as ministers are yet to agree on how to deal with stablecoins, delaying the proposed crypto legislation into next year.

According to Yonhap News Agency, there have been hold-ups in the progress of the Digital Asset Basic Act due to disagreements among financial regulators, and it remains an integral part of cryptocurrency reform in South Korea.

Stablecoin Rules Trigger Policy Deadlock

At the center of the delay sits a dispute over who should have the authority to issue stablecoins. The Financial Services Commission has led talks on drafting investor protection rules, driven by the rapid growth of stablecoin usage in domestic markets. However, consensus on issuer eligibility remains elusive.

The debate has intensified as South Korea looks to model parts of its framework on the US GENIUS Act, which introduced clearer reserve and compliance standards for stablecoin issuers. Under current proposals, issuers would need to fully back stablecoins with reserves held by qualified custodians such as commercial banks.

The Bank of Korea has taken a firm stance, arguing that banks should serve as the primary and possibly exclusive stablecoin issuers. Central bank officials say limiting issuance to bank-led groups would protect monetary stability and reduce systemic financial risk.

At the same time, however, the FSC challenged rigid rules on ownership when it decided that firms that are not banks should not be barred from the fintech industry. Excluding such firms may hamper competition and innovation in payments technology, which would be damaging to the South Korean vision to remain competitive in the fintech sector worldwide.

Oversight Structure Adds to Tensions

There are also disputes regarding governance. The BOK wants a separate committee to oversee and license issuers of stablecoins, whereas the FSC argues that it would be manageable within current administrative bodies without increasing bureaucracy.

Such issues have delayed the passage of the legislation, with the ruling Democratic Party now working on an overall cryptocurrency draft bill. Congressmen are working on packaging multiple proposals into one legislation that will end the impasse over the passage of the cryptocurrency regulatory law.

Beyond stablecoins, the draft legislation would tighten disclosure standards for digital asset service providers and strengthen customer protection requirements. Lawmakers have also reopened discussions around domestic initial coin offerings, which South Korea banned in 2017, signaling a potential policy shift.

Signs of a Broader Crypto Thaw

The regulatory slowdown comes even as South Korea shows signs of warming to the crypto industry. In September, authorities lifted restrictions that barred venture capital firms from investing in crypto companies, allowing them to apply for official venture certification.

In another notable development, Binance completed its acquisition of Gopax, marking its official return to the South Korean market after several years away.

Despite these positive signals, the lack of agreement on stablecoin regulation remains a thorn in policymakers’ sides. As regulators aren’t aligned over the issuer eligibility and oversight structures related to these digital assets, South Korea’s crypto reform agenda probably won’t move forward anytime soon.

Highlighted Crypto News Today

BlackRock’s BUIDL Crosses $2B in Assets as Tokenized Finance Gains Momentum

TagsCrypto BillCrypto LegalizationFSCSouth KoreaStablecoin

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main reason for the delay in South Korea's Digital Asset Basic Act?

AThe delay is primarily due to disagreements among financial regulators, particularly over how to deal with stablecoins, including disputes on issuer eligibility and oversight authority.

QWhich two major financial institutions are in disagreement over stablecoin issuance in South Korea?

AThe Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) are in disagreement. The BOK argues that only banks should issue stablecoins, while the FSC believes non-bank firms should not be excluded to foster competition and innovation.

QWhat US legislation is South Korea looking to model parts of its stablecoin framework on?

ASouth Korea is looking to model parts of its framework on the US GENIUS Act, which introduced clearer reserve and compliance standards for stablecoin issuers.

QWhat are some positive signs of South Korea warming to the crypto industry despite the regulatory delays?

APositive signs include lifting restrictions on venture capital firms investing in crypto companies, allowing them to apply for official venture certification, and Binance's completed acquisition of Gopax, marking its return to the South Korean market.

QBesides stablecoins, what other areas does the draft cryptocurrency legislation aim to address?

AThe draft legislation also aims to tighten disclosure standards for digital asset service providers, strengthen customer protection requirements, and reopen discussions around domestic initial coin offerings (ICOs), which were banned in 2017.

Пов'язані матеріали

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手17 хв тому

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手17 хв тому

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit25 хв тому

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit25 хв тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1 год тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片