Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-06-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-23

Анотація

South China Morning Post The leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix has surged over tenfold year-to-date, fueled by intense market speculation on the memory chip sector. By June 22, the value of the 'South Korea 2x Long SK Hynix ETF' listed in Hong Kong had skyrocketed by more than 1,061% since the start of the year, while its asset size exploded over twenty times from the end of last year. The rally is driven by AI-driven demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM), with SK Hynix recently sampling its next-generation HBM4E product. However, industry professionals warn of significant risks. Leveraged ETFs magnify both gains and losses. During a recent market correction, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell 19.1%, its double-leveraged ETF dropped nearly 38%. Korean regulators noted that such products could theoretically lose 60% in a single day. Additionally, these ETFs face risks like time decay in volatile markets, liquidity spirals during mass redemptions, and extreme price dislocations from market-making failures, as seen in early June when an ETF moved opposite to its underlying stock. The trading is predominantly driven by retail investors, with institutional capital largely absent due to the products' high volatility. Analysts caution that with the semiconductor sector at elevated valuations and facing geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties, leveraged ETFs pose a substantial threat of amplified losses for uninformed investors.

Source:Shanghai Securities News

Fueled by intense market capital interest in memory chips, as of June 22, the South China Double Long SK Hynix ETF has seen its year-to-date gains break through tenfold. Concurrently, the ETF's asset scale has skyrocketed by over twenty times compared to the end of last year.

However, industry insiders caution that against the backdrop of semiconductor sector valuations being at historical highs and growing divergence between bullish and bearish sentiments, the risks of leveraged products magnifying losses in both directions are accelerating. Retail investors need to maintain a sufficiently prudent attitude towards such instruments.

South China Double Long SK Hynix ETF Surges Over Tenfold Year-to-Date

Since 2026, the global semiconductor rally has continued its furious pace. In the A-share market, core storage stocks like GigaDevice, Deming Li, and Jiangbolong have persistently climbed; overseas market fervor remains unabated, with South Korean memory giant SK Hynix's stock price continuing its ascent. On June 22, SK Hynix briefly surpassed Samsung Electronics in market capitalization during trading hours, touching the top spot in the South Korean stock market. Its closing price rose 5.61% on the day.

Previously, SK Hynix announced it had delivered samples of its 12-layer HBM4E to key customers. This product is a new-generation high-performance DRAM designed for AI scenarios.

According to industry observers, compared to HBM4, HBM4E achieves dual upgrades in performance and energy efficiency, with a maximum pin speed reaching 16 Gbps and energy efficiency improving by over 20%. Leveraging a new interface and architecture design, it can reduce transmission latency and maintain stable operation under high-bandwidth conditions, thereby enhancing both the data processing capabilities for AI training and inference and the overall computational efficiency of next-generation AI data centers and large-scale computing systems.

Zhou Jingxiang, Fund Manager of Noah Research Select Fund, told the Shanghai Securities News reporter that the core driver of this memory upcycle stems from the explosive demand for SSD storage driven by AI inference computing power, and industry prosperity may trend upward throughout the year.

Leveraged ETFs linked to core chip leaders like SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics have also experienced epic-level market performance.

As of the close on June 22, the South China Double Long SK Hynix ETF listed in the Hong Kong market surged 16.55% in a single day, with year-to-date cumulative gains reaching a staggering 1061.92%. The product officially debuted on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on October 16, 2025, with an initial size of approximately HK$24 million. However, as the storage rally intensified, the product's scale experienced explosive growth – reaching $14.418 billion as of June 18, a meteoric rise of 21.7 times from $636 million at the end of last year.

The South China Double Long Samsung Electronics ETF has also seen substantial capital inflows. Data shows that as of June 18, its size reached $4.4 billion. Following a 215.96% surge in scale in May, its size has grown by over 50% again since June.

However, dissecting the capital structure reveals that the leveraged ETF trading market currently exhibits a highly distinct feature of retail investor dominance, with institutional capital largely absent.

"The vast majority of institutions do not allocate to leveraged ETFs; only a small number of hedge funds use them as tools for short-term swing trading," a senior foreign fund manager candidly told this newspaper. Long-term allocation funds like pensions seek stable, long-term returns, which are completely mismatched with the high-volatility, high-risk return profile of leveraged products. Individual investors constitute the core purchasing group for such products.

Beware of Potential Volatility Risks

From an industry perspective, leveraged ETFs are typical "double-edged swords" that amplify both returns and risks. They can multiply investment returns during upward market phases; however, when the market turns downward, the magnitude of losses is similarly magnified. With growing divergence in global semiconductor sector outlooks and multiple uncertainties intertwining across geopolitics, industry dynamics, and valuations, the hidden risks within leveraged ETFs are continuously being exposed. Investors need to remain highly vigilant.

Recent severe market volatility has vividly demonstrated the destructive power of leveraged product losses. The South Korean Financial Supervisory Service's monitoring report released on June 18 showed that during the period from May 27 to June 12, while the underlying Samsung Electronics stock experienced a maximum drawdown of 18.0%, the corresponding two-times leveraged long ETF suffered a maximum drawdown of 35.9%, with losses nearly doubling. The SK Hynix stock drawdown was 19.1%, but its two-times leveraged ETF drawdown expanded further to 38%. Regulatory authorities have repeatedly warned that with South Korean individual stocks having a daily price limit of ±30%, two-times leveraged products theoretically face maximum single-day losses of up to 60%. Under extreme market conditions, principal capital can be severely depleted.

Beyond the routine amplification of volatility risk, leveraged ETFs have also experienced extreme abnormal scenarios where their price action completely diverges from the underlying stock, inflicting massive losses on retail investors chasing highs in the short term. In early June this year, a two-times leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix exhibited divergent performance for two consecutive trading days: On June 8, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell nearly 8%, the ETF surged nearly 50% against the trend; the next day, when the underlying stock rose sharply over 13%, the ETF plummeted by 40% intraday.

Addressing this abnormal volatility, the product issuer, Korea Investment Management, explained that the root cause was insufficient market maker liquidity. During the closing auction period, market makers are not obligated to provide mandatory quotes. A large volume of market buy orders pushed the fund price higher, creating a significant premium. When market liquidity recovered the following day, prices rapidly converged to fair value, causing substantial drawdowns for investors who entered at the previous day's elevated prices.

A fund analyst in Shanghai systematically dissected multiple potential risks of leveraged ETFs, both long-term and short-term: Firstly, due to the derivative structure employing daily leverage resetting, high market volatility environments can lead to time decay. Even if the underlying stock price returns to its previous high, the fund's net asset value may still suffer permanent losses. Secondly, leverage amplifies both gains and losses. With the overall semiconductor sector valuation currently at historical highs, any collective pullback would trigger drawdown impacts far exceeding those of the underlying stocks. If concentrated redemptions occur after sustained product scale inflation, it could also trigger a liquidity spiral, further exacerbating price declines. Thirdly, the trading volume of leveraged products in the South Korean market is nearing that of leading chip stocks themselves. Massive retail capital concentrated in one-sided bets creates a positive feedback loop, continuously boosting buying pressure during rallies, while batch stop-loss selling accelerates declines during downturns, significantly elevating market fragility.

Uncertainties at the industry chain fundamental level can also amplify the volatility risks of leveraged products. Sheng Jin, Portfolio Director at Value Partners, told this newspaper reporter that the semiconductor industry chain is long and deeply intertwined with globalized specialization. The variables affecting valuations are complex and intertwined. Any single variable, such as a company's quarterly earnings falling short of expectations or adjustments in global industrial policies, can quickly disrupt existing valuation logic, triggering violent sector fluctuations, which high-leverage products will synchronously magnify in impact.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the year-to-date return of the Leverage Product linked to SK Hynix mentioned in the article as of June 22nd?

AThe article states that the year-to-date return of the Southern Leverage Product (ETF) that provides two times the daily return of SK Hynix has exceeded 1000%, specifically reaching 1061.92%.

QWhat are the main risks associated with leveraged ETFs like the one tracking SK Hynix, as highlighted in the article?

AThe article highlights several key risks: 1) Magnified losses during market downturns, as losses are amplified just like gains. 2) The potential for permanent value erosion due to 'volatility decay' inherent in the daily resetting leverage structure. 3) Liquidity risks, where a lack of market makers can lead to extreme price dislocations from the underlying asset, causing severe losses for investors. 4) Increased market fragility due to a high concentration of retail investors engaging in one-sided bets, which can amplify price swings.

QAccording to the article, what is the core driver of the current upcycle in the memory chip sector?

AAccording to Zhou Jingxiang, a fund manager cited in the article, the core driver of the current memory upcycle is the explosive demand for SSD storage brought about by AI inference computing power.

QWhat specific product advancement from SK Hynix is mentioned as contributing to its market performance?

AThe article mentions that SK Hynix announced it had sent samples of its next-generation high-performance DRAM, the 12-layer HBM4E, to key customers. This product is designed for AI scenarios and offers upgrades in both performance and energy efficiency compared to HBM4.

QWhat unusual price behavior did a leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix exhibit in early June, and what was the cited reason?

AIn early June, a two-times leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix exhibited a price dislocation from the underlying stock. On June 8th, the stock fell nearly 8%, but the ETF surged nearly 50%. The next day, the stock rose over 13%, but the ETF plunged 40% intraday. The product manager, Korea Investment Management Company, attributed this abnormal volatility to insufficient market maker liquidity during the closing auction period, which led to a large premium. When liquidity normalized, the price sharply corrected to its fair value.

Пов'язані матеріали

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit14 хв тому

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit14 хв тому

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手18 хв тому

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手18 хв тому

Is Ethereum Truly a "World Computer"?

Title: Is Ethereum Really a "World Computer"? Ethereum, envisioned as a "world computer" by its founder Vitalik Buterin, aims to be a decentralized platform for global applications. However, a recent analysis by Four Pillars raises questions about whether it is more accurately a "Western computer," based on the geographical distribution of its validators. Currently, the United States dominates with 38.19% of all validators, followed by Germany at 13.04%. Combined, these two countries account for over half of the network. In contrast, Asian representation is minimal, with Singapore holding only 3.15%. The concentration is partly due to affordable cloud hosting services like Hetzner and OVH in Europe and North America, as well as the prevalence of residential validators in the U.S., where individuals run nodes via home internet connections. When examining professionally operated validators, the distribution becomes more balanced. The U.S. share drops to 25.81%, while Asian countries like Singapore (7.28%), Hong Kong (6.44%), Japan (6.38%), and South Korea (4.59%) collectively approach the U.S. level. This shift reflects strategic deployments by institutions to meet regulatory requirements and reduce latency for local users. However, regions like South America, the Middle East, and Africa remain underrepresented. Ethereum's peer-to-peer network mechanisms, such as gossipsub, disadvantage areas with low node density, creating a feedback loop where delayed message propagation reduces validator performance and rewards. This imbalance challenges Ethereum's promises of censorship resistance and global accessibility. Despite these issues, opportunities exist for growth in underrepresented regions. As demand for localized staking infrastructure rises, early entrants in areas like the Middle East could establish dominant positions by offering compliant, low-latency solutions. The evolving validator landscape highlights both the structural challenges and the potential for Ethereum to move closer to its "world computer" ideal.

Foresight News2 год тому

Is Ethereum Truly a "World Computer"?

Foresight News2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片