Small-Cap Tokens Hit Four-Year Low, Is the 'Altcoin Bull Run' Completely Hopeless?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2025-12-16Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-16

Анотація

Small-cap cryptocurrency tokens have plummeted to multi-year lows, with indices tracking altcoins significantly underperforming both major cryptocurrencies and traditional equities. In 2024–2025, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 delivered strong double-digit returns with limited drawdowns, altcoin indices like the CoinDesk 80 and MarketVector Small-Cap Index fell sharply—by nearly 40% and to November 2020 lows, respectively. These altcoin indices showed high correlation (0.9) with large-cap crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum but delivered deeply negative returns, higher volatility, and worse risk-adjusted performance (negative Sharpe ratios). Liquidity is increasingly concentrated in high-value, institutionally supported assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, SOL, and XRP, indicating a structural shift away from speculative small-cap tokens. The data suggests that altcoins offered no diversification benefits and instead magnified losses during a period of broader market growth.

Author: Gino Matos

Compiled by: Luffy, Foresight News

Since January 2024, the performance comparison between cryptocurrencies and stocks indicates that the so-called new "altcoin trading" is essentially just a substitute for stock trading.

In 2024, the S&P 500 index had a return of approximately 25%, and in 2025 it reached 17.5%, with a cumulative two-year increase of about 47%. During the same period, the Nasdaq 100 index rose by 25.9% and 18.1% respectively, with a cumulative increase of nearly 49%.

The CoinDesk 80 Index, which tracks 80 assets outside the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, plummeted 46.4% in the first quarter of 2025 alone, and by mid-July, its year-to-date decline was about 38%.

By the end of 2025, the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index fell to its lowest level since November 2020, wiping out over $1 trillion in total cryptocurrency market capitalization.

This divergence in performance is by no means a statistical error. Not only did the overall altcoin portfolio have a negative return, but its volatility was comparable to or even higher than that of stocks; in contrast, major U.S. stock indices achieved double-digit growth with controllable drawdowns.

For Bitcoin investors, the core question is: Can allocating to small-cap tokens deliver risk-adjusted returns? Or is such an allocation merely taking on exposure to a negative Sharpe ratio while maintaining similar correlations to stocks? (Note: The Sharpe ratio is a core metric for measuring the risk-adjusted return of an investment portfolio. Its calculation formula is: Annualized portfolio return - Annualized risk-free rate / Annualized volatility of the portfolio.)

Choosing a Reliable Altcoin Index

For analysis, CryptoSlate tracked three altcoin indices.

The first is the CoinDesk 80 Index, launched in January 2025. This index covers 80 assets outside the CoinDesk 20 Index, providing a portfolio of diversified assets beyond Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other major tokens.

The second is the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index. This index selects the 50 smallest tokens by market cap from a basket of 100 assets, serving as a barometer for the market's "junk assets."

The third is a small-cap index launched by Kaiko. This is a research product, not a tradable benchmark, offering a clear sell-side quantitative perspective for analyzing the small-cap asset group.

These three depict the market landscape from different dimensions: the overall altcoin portfolio, high-beta small-cap tokens, and a quantitative research perspective. Yet, the conclusions they point to are highly consistent.

In contrast, the benchmark performance of the stock market shows a completely opposite trend.

In 2024, major U.S. indices achieved gains of around 25%, and in 2025, they also saw double-digit increases, with relatively limited drawdowns during the period. During this time, the maximum intra-year drawdown of the S&P 500 index was only in the mid-to-high single digits, while the Nasdaq 100 index maintained a strong upward trend throughout.

Both major indices achieved compounded annual growth without significant givebacks of gains.

The trend of the overall altcoin indices, however, is vastly different. Reports from CoinDesk Indices show that the CoinDesk 80 Index plummeted 46.4% in the first quarter alone, while the large-cap tracking CoinDesk 20 Index fell 23.2% during the same period.

By mid-July 2025, the CoinDesk 80 Index was down 38% year-to-date, whereas the CoinDesk 5 Index, which tracks Bitcoin, Ethereum, and three other major tokens, achieved a gain of 12% to 13% during the same period.

Andrew Baehr of CoinDesk Indices, in an interview with ETF.com, described this phenomenon as "identical correlation, vastly different profit and loss performance."

The correlation between the CoinDesk 5 Index and the CoinDesk 80 Index is as high as 0.9, meaning their price movements are completely aligned in direction, but the former achieved a slight double-digit growth while the latter plunged nearly 40%.

It turns out that the diversification benefits of holding small-cap altcoins are minimal, while the performance cost is extremely heavy.

The performance of the small-cap asset sector is even worse. According to Bloomberg, by November 2025, the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index had fallen to its lowest level since November 2020.

Over the past five years, the return of this small-cap index has been approximately -8%, while the corresponding large-cap index has surged about 380%. Institutional funds clearly favor large-cap assets and avoid tail risks.

Looking at the performance of altcoins in 2024, the Kaiko small-cap index fell over 30% for the year, and mid-cap tokens also struggled to keep up with Bitcoin's gains.

Market winners were highly concentrated in a few top tokens, such as SOL and Ripple. Although the share of altcoin trading volume once rebounded to the 2021 high in 2024, 64% of the trading volume was concentrated in the top ten altcoins.

Liquidity in the cryptocurrency market has not disappeared but has shifted towards higher-value assets.

Sharpe Ratio and Drawdown Magnitude

If compared from the perspective of risk-adjusted returns, the gap widens further. The CoinDesk 80 Index and various small-cap altcoin indices not only have returns deep in negative territory but also have volatility comparable to or even higher than stocks.

The CoinDesk 80 Index plummeted 46.4% in a single quarter; the MarketVector small-cap index fell to pandemic-era lows in November after another round of declines.

The overall altcoin index experienced multiple index-level halving drawdowns: the Kaiko small-cap index fell over 30% in 2024, the CoinDesk 80 Index crashed 46% in Q1 2025, and the small-cap index fell again to 2020 lows by the end of 2025.

In contrast, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices achieved cumulative returns of 25% and 17% over two years, with maximum drawdowns only in the mid-to-high single digits. The U.S. stock market had fluctuations, but they were overall controllable; the volatility of cryptocurrency indices, however, was highly destructive.

Even if the high volatility of altcoins is considered a structural feature, their unit risk return from 2024 to 2025 was still far lower than that of holding major U.S. stock indices.

From 2024 to 2025, the overall altcoin index had a negative Sharpe ratio; meanwhile, the S&P and Nasdaq indices had strong Sharpe ratios even without volatility adjustment. After volatility adjustment, the gap between them further widened.

Bitcoin Investors and Cryptocurrency Liquidity

The first insight from the above data is the trend of liquidity concentration and migration towards high-value assets. Reports from Bloomberg and Whalebook on the MarketVector small-cap index both pointed out that since early 2024, small-cap altcoins have consistently underperformed, and institutional funds have instead flowed into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.

Combined with Kaiko's observations, although the share of altcoin trading volume rebounded to 2021 levels, funds were concentrated in the top ten altcoins. The market trend is already clear: liquidity has not completely left the cryptocurrency market but has shifted towards higher-value assets.

The previous altcoin bull market was essentially just a basis trade strategy, not a structural outperformance of assets. In December 2024, the CryptoRank Altcoin Bull Index once soared to 88 points, then plummeted to 16 points in April 2025, completely giving back all gains.

The 2024 altcoin bull market ultimately turned into a typical bubble burst; by mid-2025, the overall altcoin portfolio had almost given back all its gains, while the S&P and Nasdaq indices continued to compound growth.

For wealth advisors and asset allocators considering diversification beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum, the data from CoinDesk provides a clear case reference.

As of mid-July 2025, the large-cap tracking CoinDesk 5 Index achieved a slight double-digit growth year-to-date, while the diversified altcoin index CoinDesk 80 plummeted nearly 40%, yet their correlation was as high as 0.9.

Investors allocating to small-cap altcoins did not obtain substantial diversification benefits but instead suffered far higher return losses and drawdown risks compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and U.S. stocks, while still being exposed to the same macro drivers.

Current capital views most altcoins as tactical trading targets, not strategic allocation assets. From 2024 to 2025, Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs had significantly better risk-adjusted returns, and U.S. stocks also performed brilliantly.

Liquidity in the altcoin market is increasingly concentrating towards a few "institutional-grade coins," such as SOL, Ripple, and other tokens with independent positive factors or clear regulatory prospects. Asset diversity at the index level is being squeezed by the market.

In 2025, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices rose about 17%, while the CoinDesk 80 cryptocurrency index fell 40%, and small-cap cryptocurrencies fell 30%

What Does This Mean for Liquidity in the Next Market Cycle?

The market performance from 2024 to 2025 tested whether altcoins could achieve diversification value or outperform in an environment of rising macro risk appetite. During this period, U.S. stocks achieved double-digit growth for two consecutive years with controllable drawdowns.

Bitcoin and Ethereum gained institutional recognition through spot ETFs and benefited from a moderating regulatory environment.

In contrast, the overall altcoin index not only had negative returns and larger drawdowns but also maintained high correlations with major crypto tokens and stocks, yet failed to provide corresponding compensation for the additional risks investors undertook.

Institutional capital always chases performance. The five-year return of the MarketVector small-cap index is -8%, while the corresponding large-cap index surged 380%. This gap reflects the migration of capital towards assets with clear regulation, sufficient derivatives market liquidity, and well-developed custody infrastructure.

The CoinDesk 80 Index's 46% plunge in the first quarter and its 38% year-to-date decline by mid-July indicate that the trend of capital migration towards high-value assets is not reversing but accelerating.

For Bitcoin and Ethereum investors evaluating whether to allocate to small-cap crypto tokens, the data from 2024 to 2025 provides a clear answer: the absolute returns of the overall altcoin portfolio underperformed U.S. stocks, and the risk-adjusted returns were inferior to Bitcoin and Ethereum; despite a correlation as high as 0.9 with major crypto tokens, it provided no diversification value.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the performance difference between the S&P 500 and the CoinDesk 80 Index in 2025?

AIn 2025, the S&P 500 index rose by approximately 17.5%, while the CoinDesk 80 Index plummeted by 40%.

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason for the poor performance of small-cap altcoins?

AThe main reason is that institutional capital is migrating towards high-value assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, which are seen as having clearer regulatory prospects and better infrastructure, leaving small-cap altcoins with negative returns and high volatility.

QWhat was the correlation between the CoinDesk 5 Index and the CoinDesk 80 Index, and what does this imply?

AThe correlation between the CoinDesk 5 Index and the CoinDesk 80 Index was as high as 0.9. This implies that their price directions moved almost identically, yet the performance was drastically different, with the former achieving double-digit gains while the latter fell nearly 40%, offering no meaningful diversification benefit.

QTo what level did the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index fall by the end of 2025?

ABy the end of 2025, the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index fell to its lowest level since November 2020.

QWhat does the article conclude about allocating to small-cap tokens for Bitcoin investors?

AThe article concludes that allocating to small-cap tokens did not provide a risk-adjusted return benefit. Instead, it resulted in significantly worse returns and higher drawdown risks compared to holding Bitcoin, Ethereum, or U.S. stocks, while still being exposed to the same macroeconomic factors.

Пов'язані матеріали

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit9 хв тому

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit9 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit16 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit16 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报27 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报27 хв тому

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit34 хв тому

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit34 хв тому

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbit1 год тому

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片