SlowMist Flags Snap Store Attack Targeting Crypto Seed Phrases

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-21

Анотація

Blockchain security firm SlowMist has identified a new Linux-based threat targeting cryptocurrency users through the Snap Store. Attackers hijack trusted publisher accounts by exploiting expired domains, then push malicious updates to popular wallet apps like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet. These fake apps prompt users to enter their recovery phrases, which are then stolen, enabling attackers to drain funds. This supply-chain attack exploits user trust in official update channels, making it highly effective. SlowMist warns users to verify publishers and avoid entering seed phrases on unfamiliar platforms, highlighting a growing trend of infrastructure-focused attacks in crypto security.

Blockchain security firm SlowMist has flagged a new Linux-based threat that targets crypto recovery phrases by exploiting trusted apps distributed through the Snap Store. The company warned that attackers are hijacking long-standing Snap Store publisher accounts and pushing malicious wallet updates through official distribution channels, putting long-time Linux users at risk.

In a post on X, SlowMist chief information security officer 23pds said attackers are abusing expired domains linked to legitimate Snap Store publishers. After regaining control of those domains, the attackers reset account credentials, take over trusted developer accounts, and publish malware disguised as wallet software updates. This tactic gives the attack a dangerous advantage: users often trust updates from established publishers and install them without suspicion.

Once the malicious apps land on a victim’s system, they prompt users to enter crypto wallet recovery phrases. The malware then exfiltrates those phrases, allowing attackers to drain wallets quickly, often before the victim realizes anything went wrong.

Attackers hijack Snap Store publishers using expired domains

The Snap Store is the official app store for Linux, used for the distribution of software that is packaged as “snaps.” It is considered a trusted source by many users, just like the App Store or Microsoft Store, as it provides verified publishers, easy updates, and a centralized distribution.

SlowMist said attackers are targeting publisher accounts tied to domains that have expired. Once a domain expires, criminals can re-register it and gain access to domain-linked email addresses. From there, they can initiate password resets and seize control of Snap Store developer accounts.

This method enables attackers to compromise publishers with active users and existing download histories. Rather than depending on victims to download the malicious new apps, they inject the malware into the regular updates. This supply chain tactic increases the success rate because users are more likely to accept updates and not check all the changes.

SlowMist has identified at least two domains associated with the compromised publisher accounts: “storewise[.]tech” and “vagueentertainment[.]com.” Once the attackers hijacked the accounts, they allegedly used the apps to impersonate popular crypto wallet brands.

Fake wallet apps mimic trusted brands

According to SlowMist, the affected Snap Store apps are clones of popular wallet applications like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet. Attackers use user interfaces that closely resemble legitimate applications, which increases credibility and reduces suspicion.

These apps, after being installed or updated, will ask the user to input their wallet recovery phrase with the intention of wallet setup, sync, or account verification. After the user has provided the wallet recovery phrase, the attacker can use this phrase to restore the wallet and drain its funds without needing any further access to the victim’s device.

This approach remains very effective because seed phrases provide full control of the assets. Even the strongest passwords and device security cannot protect funds once hackers possess the recovery phrase.

Supply-chain hacks grow more damaging

The incident at the Snap Store is part of a larger trend in crypto security, where attackers are moving from exploiting protocols to compromising infrastructure. Instead of attacking smart contracts directly, criminals increasingly target trusted software distribution systems, update channels, and third-party service providers.

CertiK data shared with the media house in December showed crypto hack losses reached $3.3 billion in 2025, even though the number of incidents declined. According to CertiK, the losses were more concentrated in fewer but more serious supply chain events, with $1.45 billion in losses being attributed to only two major incidents.

This trend indicates that attackers are optimizing for scale and impact. With the improvement of DeFi security at the smart contract level, attackers target the weakest links, apps, publishers, and update infrastructure, where trust is the biggest vulnerability.

What users should watch next?

For Linux users who keep crypto, the wallet software download and update processes must be done with extra care. Users need to verify the identity of the publishers, check the official download sources, and avoid entering recovery phrases on unfamiliar platforms. Security teams may also need to monitor Snap Store listings more closely, especially when there are sudden changes in the ownership of publishers.

The takeaway from the SlowMist alert is clear: the greatest danger now often comes from trusted sources, not the obvious phishing scams.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Tom Lee Warns Crypto Markets Could Face Painful Correction in 2026

TagsBlockchaincrypto securitylinuxSmart ContractSupply chain

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the new threat flagged by SlowMist that targets crypto recovery phrases?

ASlowMist has flagged a new Linux-based threat that targets crypto recovery phrases by exploiting trusted apps distributed through the Snap Store. Attackers hijack long-standing publisher accounts and push malicious wallet updates.

QHow do attackers gain control of trusted Snap Store publisher accounts?

AAttackers abuse expired domains linked to legitimate publishers. They re-register the expired domains, gain access to domain-linked email addresses, reset account credentials, and take over the trusted developer accounts.

QWhich popular crypto wallet brands are being impersonated by the malicious apps in this attack?

AThe malicious apps are clones that impersonate popular crypto wallet brands like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet.

QWhy are supply-chain attacks like the one on the Snap Store becoming more damaging according to the article?

ASupply-chain attacks are becoming more damaging because attackers are targeting trusted software distribution systems and update channels, leading to fewer but more serious incidents with concentrated losses, as seen in the $1.45 billion attributed to just two major events in 2025.

QWhat precautions should Linux users take to protect themselves from such threats?

ALinux users should verify the identity of publishers, check official download sources, avoid entering recovery phrases on unfamiliar platforms, and monitor Snap Store listings for sudden changes in publisher ownership.

Пов'язані матеріали

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit5 хв тому

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit5 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit13 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit13 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手15 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手15 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手31 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手31 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片