Six-Year Evolution of Web3 Airdrops: From Uniswap to Monad, How Should Ordinary People Properly 'Farm Airdrops' in 2026?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-04-09Востаннє оновлено о 2026-04-09

Анотація

Web3 airdrops have evolved significantly from Uniswap's 2020 genesis event, where early users were simply rewarded for protocol usage, to complex systems emphasizing genuine participation, identity verification, and attention economics. Key phases include: - **Phase 1 (2020)**: DeFi airdrops like Uniswap, with no Sybil resistance or tasks—pure reward for usage. - **Phase 2 (2021)**: ENS introduced the concept of "users as shareholders," focusing on governance and contribution. - **Phase 3 (2022-2023)**: Airdrops became growth hacking tools (e.g., Aptos, Arbitrum, Celestia), using multi-tier scoring and cross-ecosystem criteria. - **Phase 4 (2024-2026)**: Points systems (e.g., Blast, EigenLayer) prioritize TVL, duration, and liquidity locking over transaction volume. Future trends indicate: - Chain-level airdrops are declining; ecosystem-level airdrops (e.g., restaking, lending) will dominate. - Rising capital requirements and AI-driven allocation using on-chain reputation and behavior analysis. - A shift from rewards to attention economics, where community influence and identity matter most. For 2026, focus on: - Technical contributions (e.g., testnet nodes). - Completed quests and points systems. - Active community engagement (Discord, social media). - Long-term participation and identity building. Airdrops are no longer just token distributions but tools for user acquisition, governance, and community building. Success requires strategy升级: ...

Author: kkmoat, GANx Labs Founder & stacks.btc Chinese Community Lead

Web3 Airdrops are essentially a core strategy for projects to incentivize early user participation, bootstrap liquidity, decentralize governance, and rapidly accumulate community and TVL (Total Value Locked) by freely distributing native tokens or NFTs.

From the "DeFi Summer" initiated by Uniswap in 2020 to the present, airdrops have evolved from simple "everyone gets a share" marketing tools into complex behavioral incentive systems, anti-Sybil mechanisms, and long-term retention tools.

Current trends in 2026 show: blanket airdrops have significantly diminished, shifting towards threshold-based, quest/task-mining, and hybrid models, emphasizing genuine usage over volume farming.

Phase 1 (2020): The "Genesis Era" of DeFi Airdrops

Representative Projects

  • Uniswap
  • 1inch
  • dYdX

Must mention Uniswap, because:all subsequent airdrops are essentially its derivatives.

September 2020:

Uniswap distributed 400 UNI to historical users

Directly changed the industry's distribution model

It is basically considered:Web3's first large-scale "wealth redistribution event"

Key Characteristics

1) No Sybil

2) No farming

3) No task system

4) No points

Simply:You used the product → You get money, the essence is Protocol ownership, not Marketing.

Phase 2 (2021): The ENS Era — "Users Own the Protocol"

Representative Projects

  • ENS
  • DYDX
  • Gitcoin

The most iconic among them:ENS (2021)

This was a milestone airdrop because it was the first to explicitly state:

Users are not users

<极 data-text="true">Users are shareholders

ENS distributed governance tokens to users holding .eth domains, for DAO governance.

Why is ENS particularly important?

Because it established:Web3's political system, not its financial system.

Three Long-term Impacts of ENS

1) DAO governance became default

Almost all protocols now have: Governance token

2) "Contribution" became a core metric

For example:

  • Holding a domain
  • Using the protocol
  • Participating in governance

Not simply farming DeFi trading volume.

3) Community ownership narrative took shape

This phrase started with ENS:

users → owners

Phase 3 (2022–2023): Airdrops Become Growth Hacking Tools

This is:The most critical turning point

Airdrops changed from:Rewarding users to:Acquiring users

Representative Projects

The listed ones belong to this phase:

  • Aptos
  • Arbitrum
  • Starknet
  • Celestia

Aptos (2022)

This is:The standardization of the Testnet airdrop model

Characteristics:

Run testnet

Test claiming NFTs

Run a node

It distributed approximately $430 million worth of tokens to testnet users. I only 5 minutes binding Google and Discord accounts, and received an airdrop of 150 APT tokens worth $1700.

Key Change

This was the first time:Technical contribution = airdrop, not just using a Dapp.

Arbitrum (2023)

This is:The largest L2 airdrop

Value close to: $2 billion USD.

Arbitrum made a key innovation:

Multi-tier scoring

For example:

bridge

transaction

liquidity

DAO voting

This directly led to:Airdrops becoming financialized,because: You could optimize your wallet address behavior to increase airdrop weight.

Celestia (2023)

This is:The modular blockchain narrative airdrop

Airdrop recipients included:

Cosmos staker

Rollup developer

Ethereum user

And distributed approximately: $730 million USD.

Key Change

This was the first time:Cross-ecosystem airdrop,not: Single-chain airdrop.

Starknet (2024)

This is:One of the most controversial airdrops,reason: It was the first to start mass filtering users based on a balance condition, and added multi-dimensional black box criteria.

For example:

GitHub developer

Ethereum staker

contributor

And: Approximately 50 million STRK was allocated to early community member programs.

Key Change

This was the first time:identity-based,

not: activity-based.

Phase 4 (2024–2026): The Points Economy Era

This is: The current era.

Core mechanism:

Points system

For example:

  • Blur — Earn points by depositing ETH and trading NFTs
  • Blast — Earn points by depositing ETH
  • EigenLayer — Earn points by restaking
  • LayerZero — Long-term interaction records
  • Scroll — Complete tasks to earn Points

Now: Everything you see is not actually an airdrop.

But rather:pre-airdrop incentive system

Key Change

Airdrops are no longer about completing tasks, but:locking funds,the core metrics now are:

  • TVL
  • duration
  • liquidity

Not:

transaction count

Modern airdrops increasingly rely on points systems to measure user loyalty and deposit duration, but deposits can be stolen, or become unprofitable due to time redundancy, and the final airdrop might even be less than the principal.

Monad: A Very Typical "Attention-Driven Airdrop"

Monad's core is not technology,but:Attention engineering

Testnet has over hundreds of millions of address users, but it's not product-driven, it's:socially driven. This is a key characteristic of the new generation of airdrops.

Participating with lots of address interactions is useless; you need to gain project recognition, obtain Discord roles, have social media influence to get a Monad Card, get nominated—it's increasingly developing like a private domain rather than simple interaction.

Why do almost all projects do airdrops now?

The answer is simple:Airdrops are the cheapest user acquisition method

  • Traditional method: Google Ads
  • Cost: $50–$200 / user
  • Airdrop method: Issue token
  • Cost: 0 (theoretically)

So airdrops becomegrowth tools,not rewards.

The Real Economics of Airdrops (Most people don't realize this)

This is the most important part. Many airdrop projects experience:First rise → then large-scale sell-off

For example:

  • ENS
  • dYdX
  • STRK

Prices rose rapidly driven by market enthusiasm, but then corrected significantly due to selling pressure.

This is called:Airdrop Dump Cycle

Process:

1) Airdrop

2) Price spike

3) Dump

4) Stabilization

This is something almost all airdrop projects experience. Therefore, if you receive an airdrop, you need to think about a good time frame to sell, rather than simply FOMO or FUD.

The Future of Airdrops: 5 Trends,This is my core judgment.

1) Chain-level airdrop is over

For example:

Arbitrum

Starknet

zkSync

Scroll

Basically all have been issued. The future isonly ecosystem airdrops

For example:

Lending

Restaking

NFT infra

So I believe future opportunities mainly come from ecosystem protocols, not the chains themselves.

2) Airdrops are becoming financial products

For example:

staking

restaking

liquidity mining

Essence:Yield (lending),not reward.

3) Capital门槛 will become higher and higher

Before $0, now $1000+ is just entry level, future might even be $10000+, because Sybil costs are rising.

4) AI will participate in airdrop allocation

This is already happening a lot, e.g., auto-chat, auto-trade. Therefore, future projects might use:

on-chain reputation

behavioral pattern

identity graph

These will determine whether you can claim the airdrop, not just connecting and claiming in a single way.

5) Airdrops are becoming an "attention war"

Not a technology competition, but who can attract users.

Most值得关注的空投类型 (2026)

Tier 1 (Most likely to produce large-scale airdrops) Examples below

Monad

Eclipse

Berachain

Movement

Tier 2 (Medium airdrops)

restaking

lending

derivatives

Tier 3 (Small but frequent)

DEX

NFT infra

social

Final Summary (Core Viewpoints)

If I want to summarize,

1) 2020: Airdrop is a reward

2) 2021: Airdrop is user equity

3) 2022: Airdrop is growth

4) 2023: Airdrop is a transaction

4) 2024-2025: Airdrop is finance

5) 2026: Airdrop is attention

What needs to be done

1# Abandon meaningless testnet volume farming

2# Participate in project testnet nodes or technical contributions

3# Participate in the project's explicit airdrop task system

4# Participate in staking, trading, and other systems designed to explicitly obtain Points

5# Be active in Discord communities to gain community contributor status

6# Continuously use the product and participate deeply, long-termism

7# Build on-chain identity, keep Web2 identity active

Since the genesis event of Uniswap in 2020, Web3 airdrops have evolved from simple "use and get rewarded" to complex behavioral incentives, identity verification, and attention economy systems. From ENS explicitly stating that users are protocol shareholders, to projects like Aptos and Arbitrum optimizing airdrop weights through multi-dimensional scoring, to the current Points systems and attention-driven design, the essence of airdrops is no longer just token distribution, but a tool for long-term participation, community building, and value认同.

For long-term participants and newcomers, airdrops are still full of opportunities, but strategies must be upgraded: abandon simple volume farming, deeply participate in testnets and node contributions, complete task systems, actively stake and interact, and build influence within communities. In this way, you may not only receive quality airdrops but also truly become part of the protocol ecosystem.

Although blanket airdrops have significantly cooled, threshold-based, task-mining, and hybrid models are rising, emphasizing genuine usage and long-term value. This means that,as long as the method is appropriate and the strategy is long-term, airdrops are still a viable way to obtain early equity and participate in innovative ecosystems. The future belongs to those who understand on-chain identity, contribute value, and the attention economy—the opportunities in the airdrop industry have never truly disappeared.

In short,Airdrops evolved from reward → user equity → growth → transaction → finance → attention, becoming a core tool for Web3 user acquisition, governance, and community building. The core capabilities for the future lie in identity, contribution, attention, and long-term participation.

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core evolution of Web3 airdrops from 2020 to 2026 according to the article?

AThe core evolution is: 2020 - Airdrops as rewards; 2021 - Airdrops as user equity; 2022 - Airdrops as growth; 2023 - Airdrops as transactions; 2024-2025 - Airdrops as finance; 2026 - Airdrops as attention.

QWhich project is considered the genesis event that started the large-scale 'wealth redistribution' in Web3 airdrops?

AUniswap is considered the genesis event, as it distributed 400 UNI to historical users in September 2020, fundamentally changing the industry's distribution model.

QWhat was the key innovation introduced by the ENS airdrop in 2021?

AThe ENS airdrop introduced the concept that 'users are not users, users are shareholders,' establishing Web3's political system (DAO governance) rather than just a financial system, and making contribution a core metric for distribution.

QWhat is the primary mechanism used in the current 'Phase 4' of airdrops (2024-2026)?

AThe primary mechanism is the 'Points system,' which functions as a pre-airdrop incentive system that measures user loyalty and deposit duration (e.g., TVL, duration, liquidity) rather than just transaction count.

QWhat are the two major future trends for airdrops mentioned in the article?

ATwo major trends are: 1) Airdrops are becoming financial products (e.g., staking, restaking, liquidity mining) focused on yield, not just rewards. 2) AI will participate in airdrop allocation using on-chain reputation, behavioral patterns, and identity graphs to filter users.

Пов'язані матеріали

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit3 хв тому

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit3 хв тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit2 год тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit2 год тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit2 год тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit2 год тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit2 год тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити PEOPLE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Після придбання ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Легко торгуйте ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

490 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити PEOPLE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни PEOPLE (PEOPLE).

活动图片