Senators Signal Progress On Crypto Market Structure Bill Amid Key Vote Delay

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-01-16Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-16

Анотація

Despite a delay in the markup for the CLARITY Act, a key crypto market structure bill, lawmakers remain optimistic about its passage. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott described the postponement as tactical, emphasizing ongoing negotiations and bipartisan cooperation. However, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrew support, raising concerns that the bill could restrict tokenized equities, DeFi, and expand government surveillance while shifting regulatory power to the SEC. White House crypto czar David Sacks urged the industry to resolve disagreements during the delay, noting that legislative progress is closer than ever. Experts and officials agree that federal regulation is essential for both innovation and consumer protection in the crypto market.

Despite a surprising postponement of the markup for the crypto market structure bill known as the CLARITY Act, lawmakers are maintaining a hopeful outlook for the passage of the legislation.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott announced the delay on Wednesday, stating that bipartisan negotiations are ongoing. He characterized the pause as tactical rather than indicative of failure.

Coinbase CEO Voices Alarm Over CLARITY Act’s Potential Impact

In a message on social media platform X (previously Twitter), Scott expressed confidence, noting, “I’ve spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith.”

In an interview with Fox News prior to the cancellation of the markup, Scott noted that the Republican Party has made significant efforts to incorporate bipartisan support into the legislation.

“We’ve taken over 90 of the Democrats’ priorities and filtered them,” he explained. Scott highlighted key issues, such as anti-money laundering (AML) measures, which are important to both parties, aligning on national security concerns.

However, the momentum faced a setback when Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrew the company’s support for the CLARITY Act in its current form.

Armstrong raised concerns that the bill could prohibit tokenized equities, impose restrictions on decentralized finance (DeFi), and expand government access to financial data at the expense of individual privacy.

The executive also cautioned that the legislation could shift power from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and eliminate stablecoin rewards, potentially sidelining crypto competition.

Crypto Czar Urges Industry To Resolve Differences

Following the postponement of the vote, White House crypto czar David Sacks urged the industry to use this delay to address any remaining disagreements. “Passage of market structure legislation remains as close as it’s ever been,” Sacks stated on X.

The Trump administration continues to express a commitment to collaborating with Scott, the Senate Banking Committee, and industry stakeholders to advance bipartisan crypto legislation as swiftly as possible.

Although the specifics of the bill are still under negotiation, there is widespread consensus among both asset managers and experts that federal intervention is crucial not only for the growth of cryptocurrency but also for consumer protection.

Kyle Wool, CEO of Dominari Securities, shared his perspective, stating, “As newer, more fringe industries grow and capital increases, there will be a greater need for oversight from regulators.”

He outlined that proper regulations should not stifle innovation but instead ensure that markets remain fair, honest, and efficient for all investors. Wool added that such measures would also make the crypto market accessible to a broader audience, enhancing liquidity and depth.

Pro-crypto Senator Cynthia Lummis, who has been an advocate for the growth and development of the digital asset industry, asserted that lawmakers are now “closer than ever,” with ongoing negotiations leaning toward a bipartisan agreement.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap drop following the markup delay. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhy was the markup for the CLARITY Act postponed, and how did lawmakers characterize this delay?

AThe markup for the CLARITY Act was postponed to allow for ongoing bipartisan negotiations. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott characterized the delay as a tactical pause rather than a sign of failure, stating that everyone remains at the table working in good faith.

QWhat were the main concerns raised by Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong that led to the withdrawal of support for the bill?

ABrian Armstrong raised concerns that the bill could prohibit tokenized equities, impose restrictions on decentralized finance (DeFi), expand government access to financial data at the expense of privacy, shift regulatory power from the CFTC to the SEC, and eliminate stablecoin rewards.

QWhat did White House crypto czar David Sacks urge the industry to do following the postponement?

AFollowing the postponement, David Sacks urged the crypto industry to use the delay to address any remaining disagreements, noting that the passage of market structure legislation remains as close as it's ever been.

QAccording to the article, what is the general consensus among asset managers and experts regarding federal intervention in crypto?

AThere is a widespread consensus that federal intervention is crucial not only for the growth of the cryptocurrency industry but also for consumer protection.

QWhat perspective did Dominari Securities CEO Kyle Wool share about regulation in the crypto industry?

AKyle Wool stated that as newer, fringe industries grow, there will be a greater need for regulatory oversight. He outlined that proper regulations should ensure markets remain fair, honest, and efficient without stifling innovation, thereby making the market accessible to a broader audience and enhancing liquidity.

Пов'язані матеріали

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit39 хв тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit39 хв тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit52 хв тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit52 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片