Seed Round Funding of $8 Million: How Does Bulk Trade Dare to Charge into the Red Ocean of Perp DEX?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-28

Анотація

Bulk Trade, a Perp DEX built on Solana, has raised $8 million in a seed round led by 6th Man Ventures and Robot Ventures, with participation from Wintermute, Chapter One, and angel investors including Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko. The platform differentiates itself by customizing Solana’s validator client architecture to achieve high-speed, CEX-like matching performance while maintaining decentralized settlement. Its core innovation, Bulk-Agave, is a fork of Jito-agave with a dedicated plugin called Bulk Tile that handles order matching and liquidation logic efficiently. Orders are split into fragments and propagated via UDP to minimize latency and packet loss. Matching occurs every 20 milliseconds in structured “ticks” to ensure fairness and prevent front-running. The system also includes self-trade prevention and supports USDC margined perpetual contracts with a central limit order book. Bulk claims advantages in speed (20ms updates vs. 400ms on typical Solana DEXs), real liquidity (orders remain until cancelled), and cost efficiency (no gas fees for orders, batch processing). It emphasizes self-custody, avoiding cross-chain or sequencer risks. Currently in private testnet, Bulk Trade aims to combine near-CEX performance with decentralized security, positioning itself as a high-performance contender in the competitive Perp DEX landscape.

In the field of Perp DEX, despite the continuous evolution of liquidity and user interfaces, constrained by the underlying consensus mechanism and block generation time of public chains, DEXs have always struggled to fully match CEXs in terms of latency and throughput.

Bulk Trade has taken a different path, choosing a technical route unlike conventional Perp DEXs: delving into the underlying infrastructure, it attempts to build a trading layer that combines centralized-level matching speed with decentralized settlement capabilities by customizing the Solana validator client architecture.

What's the Background?

According to official disclosures, Bulk raised $8 million in a seed funding round, led by 6th Man Ventures and Robot Ventures. Other participants included market maker Wintermute, Chapter One, Mirana Ventures, Big Brain Holdings, as well as angel investors Anatoly Yakovenko (Toly, co-founder of Solana) and Ceteris, Head of Research at Delphi Digital.

Bulk's two co-founders are quite active in the crypto community:

· Co-founder and CEO Kobie McGlashan: Co-founded Web3 recruitment and consulting firm BEExperience in February 2022 and served as CEO. From April to August 2022, he was Vice President of Marketing and Development at Orderly Network. Prior to that, he also worked as a Regional Control Manager at UK telecom giant Openreach.

· Co-founder and CTO Junaid Peer: Self-proclaimed "orderbook oligarch," serving as co-founder of Bulk. His public information indicates long-term involvement in building order book-related systems, but detailed career history is limited in public channels, with content primarily centered around the Bulk project. He has about 9,300 followers on platform X, with content mostly discussing trading infrastructure and the Solana ecosystem.

What is the Core Architecture?

The operation of the Solana blockchain relies on numerous "validators." Bulk did not start from scratch but built upon a fork of the mainstream Solana validator client Jito-agave, called Bulk-Agave, and equipped the validator with a dedicated plugin—Bulk Tile. This plugin can run in parallel with the validator's original work, specifically handling key logic such as order matching and liquidation engines, significantly improving processing efficiency.

Regarding the order propagation logic of the BULK trading platform, simply put, after users deposit funds on the Solana chain, they can start trading. Orders are imported through the BULK Net propagation layer, which first breaks the order into 8 small shards; any validator can reconstruct the original order by obtaining any 6 of them. Then, BULK uses the UDP protocol to have core nodes "forward upon receipt, transmitting only small shards," which not only solves the packet loss problem in high-frequency trading but also significantly increases propagation speed.

Next is the issue of order matching. BULK's order matching is not done arbitrarily but follows a fixed rhythm—triggering a "matching cycle (tick)" every 20 milliseconds. All orders are sorted according to a fixed rule calculated from "public key, random number, matching cycle number." All nodes produce results based on the same rule, with no center and no manipulation, preventing front-running and striving for fairness as much as possible. What truly determines order priority is only the matching cycle in which the order enters the system.

In addition, Bulk will also have a Self-Trade Prevention (STP) function. For market makers and professional quantitative traders, who often place orders at both the bid and ask simultaneously, it's easy to accidentally trigger self-trades. This mechanism can effectively protect such professional traders.

At the final step of the entire trading process, it's final confirmation and settlement. BULK first uses a fast economic confirmation of 25-40 milliseconds to meet the speed requirements of high-frequency trading, allowing traders to act immediately; then it synchronizes the trading results to Solana to complete the final on-chain settlement confirmation.

What are Bulk's Features?

The Bulk trading system is built around a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) for each perpetual contract market. All contracts are margin settled in USDC.

In terms of speed, according to Delphi Digital's explanation, Bulk has faster price refreshes, more genuine liquidity, and higher cost efficiency. While ordinary trading platforms in the Solana ecosystem refresh every 400 milliseconds, Bulk updates asynchronously every 20 milliseconds, completely decoupled from block generation. Additionally, makers on other platforms might cancel orders before execution, creating illusory liquidity. Bulk requires that orders remain valid until actively canceled by the maker, meaning the liquidity seen is actually executable. Regarding settlement, Bulk uses price-time priority rules, with orders executed in the sequence they arrive.

Bulk states that its platform allows for gas-free order placement and the use of APIs and CCXT, simplifying the user experience and eliminating blockchain complexity for traders. Furthermore, Bulk further compresses trading costs by processing orders in batches.

In terms of security, Bulk states, "There's no need to hand over assets to the platform for custody, no cross-chain or sequencer involved, eliminating risks of platform runaway or fund misappropriation, as well as the security vulnerabilities and centralization risks commonly found in cross-chain and Layer 2 solutions."

Moreover, for validators, while running BULK's trading logic, they do not forfeit the MEV收益 generated from Jito's block space auctions and can also profit from the order flow of Bulk's order book, forming a良性生态激励机制 (benign ecological incentive mechanism).

Summary

Bulk Trade represents another attempt to build a high-performance derivatives trading platform on Solana. By integrating the matching engine into validator nodes, the project aims to achieve performance close to that of centralized trading platforms while maintaining decentralization.

Currently, Bulk Trade is already in the internal testing phase and is about to open its public testnet. As the public testnet approaches, we will continue to observe whether this high-performance trading platform can change the competitive landscape of on-chain derivatives.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core technical approach of Bulk Trade to address the limitations of Perp DEX in terms of latency and throughput?

ABulk Trade customizes the Solana validator client architecture by building on a fork of Jito-agave called Bulk-Agave and equipping validators with a dedicated plugin called Bulk Tile. This plugin handles order matching and liquidation engine logic asynchronously, significantly improving processing efficiency. It uses a sharding mechanism for order propagation and a fixed 20-millisecond 'matching cycle (tick)' for fair, decentralized order matching without front-running.

QWho are the key investors and backers of Bulk Trade's $8 million seed funding round?

AThe seed round was led by 6th Man Ventures and Robot Ventures. Other participants included market maker Wintermute, Chapter One, Mirana Ventures, Big Brain Holdings, and angel investors Anatoly Yakovenko (co-founder of Solana) and Ceteris (Delphi Digital's Head of Research).

QHow does Bulk Trade's order propagation and matching system work to achieve high speed and prevent issues like packet loss?

AOrders are propagated through the BULK Net layer, where they are split into 8 shards. Any validator can reconstruct the original order with any 6 shards. UDP protocol is used for fast, 'send-and-forward' transmission of small shards, solving packet loss issues in high-frequency trading. Matching occurs every 20 milliseconds in a fixed cycle, with orders prioritized based on the cycle they enter, ensuring fairness and no front-running.

QWhat are the main advantages of Bulk Trade in terms of speed, liquidity authenticity, and cost efficiency compared to other Solana platforms?

ABulk Trade updates prices every 20 milliseconds asynchronously, unlike typical Solana platforms that refresh every 400 milliseconds. It ensures authentic liquidity by requiring orders to remain valid until actively canceled, preventing fake liquidity. It offers gas-free order placement, uses APIs and CCXT for simplicity, and reduces costs through order batching. It also provides fast economic confirmation (25-40 ms) for immediate trading actions.

QHow does Bulk Trade maintain security and decentralization while integrating its matching engine into validator nodes?

ABulk Trade does not require users to custody assets with the platform, avoiding risks like fund misuse or platform runaway. It eliminates the need for cross-chain or sequencer solutions, reducing centralization risks and common security vulnerabilities. Validators running Bulk can still earn MEV rewards from Jito's block space auctions and profit from Bulk's order flow, creating a sustainable ecosystem incentive without compromising decentralization.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit9 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit9 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手9 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手9 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit11 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit11 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手13 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手13 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit14 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit14 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси