Seed Round Funding of $8 Million: How Does Bulk Trade Dare to Charge into the Red Ocean of Perp DEX?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-28

Анотація

Bulk Trade, a Perp DEX built on Solana, has raised $8 million in a seed round led by 6th Man Ventures and Robot Ventures, with participation from Wintermute, Chapter One, and angel investors including Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko. The platform differentiates itself by customizing Solana’s validator client architecture to achieve high-speed, CEX-like matching performance while maintaining decentralized settlement. Its core innovation, Bulk-Agave, is a fork of Jito-agave with a dedicated plugin called Bulk Tile that handles order matching and liquidation logic efficiently. Orders are split into fragments and propagated via UDP to minimize latency and packet loss. Matching occurs every 20 milliseconds in structured “ticks” to ensure fairness and prevent front-running. The system also includes self-trade prevention and supports USDC margined perpetual contracts with a central limit order book. Bulk claims advantages in speed (20ms updates vs. 400ms on typical Solana DEXs), real liquidity (orders remain until cancelled), and cost efficiency (no gas fees for orders, batch processing). It emphasizes self-custody, avoiding cross-chain or sequencer risks. Currently in private testnet, Bulk Trade aims to combine near-CEX performance with decentralized security, positioning itself as a high-performance contender in the competitive Perp DEX landscape.

In the field of Perp DEX, despite the continuous evolution of liquidity and user interfaces, constrained by the underlying consensus mechanism and block generation time of public chains, DEXs have always struggled to fully match CEXs in terms of latency and throughput.

Bulk Trade has taken a different path, choosing a technical route unlike conventional Perp DEXs: delving into the underlying infrastructure, it attempts to build a trading layer that combines centralized-level matching speed with decentralized settlement capabilities by customizing the Solana validator client architecture.

What's the Background?

According to official disclosures, Bulk raised $8 million in a seed funding round, led by 6th Man Ventures and Robot Ventures. Other participants included market maker Wintermute, Chapter One, Mirana Ventures, Big Brain Holdings, as well as angel investors Anatoly Yakovenko (Toly, co-founder of Solana) and Ceteris, Head of Research at Delphi Digital.

Bulk's two co-founders are quite active in the crypto community:

· Co-founder and CEO Kobie McGlashan: Co-founded Web3 recruitment and consulting firm BEExperience in February 2022 and served as CEO. From April to August 2022, he was Vice President of Marketing and Development at Orderly Network. Prior to that, he also worked as a Regional Control Manager at UK telecom giant Openreach.

· Co-founder and CTO Junaid Peer: Self-proclaimed "orderbook oligarch," serving as co-founder of Bulk. His public information indicates long-term involvement in building order book-related systems, but detailed career history is limited in public channels, with content primarily centered around the Bulk project. He has about 9,300 followers on platform X, with content mostly discussing trading infrastructure and the Solana ecosystem.

What is the Core Architecture?

The operation of the Solana blockchain relies on numerous "validators." Bulk did not start from scratch but built upon a fork of the mainstream Solana validator client Jito-agave, called Bulk-Agave, and equipped the validator with a dedicated plugin—Bulk Tile. This plugin can run in parallel with the validator's original work, specifically handling key logic such as order matching and liquidation engines, significantly improving processing efficiency.

Regarding the order propagation logic of the BULK trading platform, simply put, after users deposit funds on the Solana chain, they can start trading. Orders are imported through the BULK Net propagation layer, which first breaks the order into 8 small shards; any validator can reconstruct the original order by obtaining any 6 of them. Then, BULK uses the UDP protocol to have core nodes "forward upon receipt, transmitting only small shards," which not only solves the packet loss problem in high-frequency trading but also significantly increases propagation speed.

Next is the issue of order matching. BULK's order matching is not done arbitrarily but follows a fixed rhythm—triggering a "matching cycle (tick)" every 20 milliseconds. All orders are sorted according to a fixed rule calculated from "public key, random number, matching cycle number." All nodes produce results based on the same rule, with no center and no manipulation, preventing front-running and striving for fairness as much as possible. What truly determines order priority is only the matching cycle in which the order enters the system.

In addition, Bulk will also have a Self-Trade Prevention (STP) function. For market makers and professional quantitative traders, who often place orders at both the bid and ask simultaneously, it's easy to accidentally trigger self-trades. This mechanism can effectively protect such professional traders.

At the final step of the entire trading process, it's final confirmation and settlement. BULK first uses a fast economic confirmation of 25-40 milliseconds to meet the speed requirements of high-frequency trading, allowing traders to act immediately; then it synchronizes the trading results to Solana to complete the final on-chain settlement confirmation.

What are Bulk's Features?

The Bulk trading system is built around a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) for each perpetual contract market. All contracts are margin settled in USDC.

In terms of speed, according to Delphi Digital's explanation, Bulk has faster price refreshes, more genuine liquidity, and higher cost efficiency. While ordinary trading platforms in the Solana ecosystem refresh every 400 milliseconds, Bulk updates asynchronously every 20 milliseconds, completely decoupled from block generation. Additionally, makers on other platforms might cancel orders before execution, creating illusory liquidity. Bulk requires that orders remain valid until actively canceled by the maker, meaning the liquidity seen is actually executable. Regarding settlement, Bulk uses price-time priority rules, with orders executed in the sequence they arrive.

Bulk states that its platform allows for gas-free order placement and the use of APIs and CCXT, simplifying the user experience and eliminating blockchain complexity for traders. Furthermore, Bulk further compresses trading costs by processing orders in batches.

In terms of security, Bulk states, "There's no need to hand over assets to the platform for custody, no cross-chain or sequencer involved, eliminating risks of platform runaway or fund misappropriation, as well as the security vulnerabilities and centralization risks commonly found in cross-chain and Layer 2 solutions."

Moreover, for validators, while running BULK's trading logic, they do not forfeit the MEV收益 generated from Jito's block space auctions and can also profit from the order flow of Bulk's order book, forming a良性生态激励机制 (benign ecological incentive mechanism).

Summary

Bulk Trade represents another attempt to build a high-performance derivatives trading platform on Solana. By integrating the matching engine into validator nodes, the project aims to achieve performance close to that of centralized trading platforms while maintaining decentralization.

Currently, Bulk Trade is already in the internal testing phase and is about to open its public testnet. As the public testnet approaches, we will continue to observe whether this high-performance trading platform can change the competitive landscape of on-chain derivatives.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core technical approach of Bulk Trade to address the limitations of Perp DEX in terms of latency and throughput?

ABulk Trade customizes the Solana validator client architecture by building on a fork of Jito-agave called Bulk-Agave and equipping validators with a dedicated plugin called Bulk Tile. This plugin handles order matching and liquidation engine logic asynchronously, significantly improving processing efficiency. It uses a sharding mechanism for order propagation and a fixed 20-millisecond 'matching cycle (tick)' for fair, decentralized order matching without front-running.

QWho are the key investors and backers of Bulk Trade's $8 million seed funding round?

AThe seed round was led by 6th Man Ventures and Robot Ventures. Other participants included market maker Wintermute, Chapter One, Mirana Ventures, Big Brain Holdings, and angel investors Anatoly Yakovenko (co-founder of Solana) and Ceteris (Delphi Digital's Head of Research).

QHow does Bulk Trade's order propagation and matching system work to achieve high speed and prevent issues like packet loss?

AOrders are propagated through the BULK Net layer, where they are split into 8 shards. Any validator can reconstruct the original order with any 6 shards. UDP protocol is used for fast, 'send-and-forward' transmission of small shards, solving packet loss issues in high-frequency trading. Matching occurs every 20 milliseconds in a fixed cycle, with orders prioritized based on the cycle they enter, ensuring fairness and no front-running.

QWhat are the main advantages of Bulk Trade in terms of speed, liquidity authenticity, and cost efficiency compared to other Solana platforms?

ABulk Trade updates prices every 20 milliseconds asynchronously, unlike typical Solana platforms that refresh every 400 milliseconds. It ensures authentic liquidity by requiring orders to remain valid until actively canceled, preventing fake liquidity. It offers gas-free order placement, uses APIs and CCXT for simplicity, and reduces costs through order batching. It also provides fast economic confirmation (25-40 ms) for immediate trading actions.

QHow does Bulk Trade maintain security and decentralization while integrating its matching engine into validator nodes?

ABulk Trade does not require users to custody assets with the platform, avoiding risks like fund misuse or platform runaway. It eliminates the need for cross-chain or sequencer solutions, reducing centralization risks and common security vulnerabilities. Validators running Bulk can still earn MEV rewards from Jito's block space auctions and profit from Bulk's order flow, creating a sustainable ecosystem incentive without compromising decentralization.

Пов'язані матеріали

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit38 хв тому

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit38 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit46 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit46 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手48 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手48 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手1 год тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片