SEC’s Crypto Advocate Says Blockchain Code Is Protected By The Constitution

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-06-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-05

Анотація

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce argued that publishing open-source blockchain code is a protected activity under the First Amendment and developers should not be automatically liable as securities intermediaries for how others use their software. She emphasized that liability should fall on those who engage in unlawful conduct, not the tool creators. Her remarks reflect a broader regulatory shift at the SEC under Chair Paul Atkins, moving away from regulation by enforcement. The agency's Crypto Task Force is reviewing how existing securities laws, designed for traditional intermediaries, apply to decentralized systems. Recent SEC guidance also suggested some platforms accessing decentralized protocols may not qualify as traditional brokers. The SEC's strategic plan through 2030 indicates blockchain and crypto assets remain a long-term priority as potentially transformative technologies for financial infrastructure.

A federal securities regulator is drawing a line between writing blockchain code and being responsible for how that code gets used — and the distinction could reshape how the government treats software developers in the decentralized finance space.

Broader Regulatory Shift Behind The Remarks

Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission, made the case Tuesday at the IC3 Blockchain Camp at Princeton University that publishing open-source blockchain software is a protected activity under the First Amendment.

She argued that developers who release DeFi code should not be automatically classified as securities intermediaries just because other people use what they built.

Legal liability, she said, should fall on those who actually engage in unlawful conduct — not on the people who wrote the underlying tools.

Peirce’s remarks fit into a wider rethinking underway at the SEC since Chair Paul Atkins took the helm.

Source: SEC

The agency has been pulling back from what Atkins has described as regulation by enforcement, with its Crypto Task Force now reviewing how existing securities laws apply to digital assets and decentralized systems.

Peirce, a long-standing voice for clearer rules in the crypto space, has been central to that push.

Rules Built For A Different World

She pointed to the SEC’s rulebook as evidence of the problem. The agency’s regulations were designed around intermediaries — brokers, dealers, exchanges, clearinghouses, transfer agents, investment advisers, and investment companies.

Peirce questioned whether those same rules make sense when applied to distributed blockchain networks that exist for purposes well beyond securities transactions.

Her comments came weeks after SEC staff issued separate guidance addressing broker-dealer registration requirements for certain user interfaces.

BTCUSD now trading at $62,332. Chart: TradingView

That guidance indicated some front-end websites and software platforms that provide access to decentralized protocols may not qualify as brokers under the traditional legal definition — a signal that the agency is rethinking how far its existing categories can stretch.

Digital Assets As Long-Term Priority

The SEC has also signaled that crypto and blockchain technology will remain a focus for years ahead. In its draft Strategic Plan through fiscal 2030, the agency described blockchain and crypto assets as technologies with the potential to reshape America’s financial infrastructure.

Taken together, the staff guidance, the strategic plan, and Peirce’s speech at Princeton paint a picture of an agency trying to redraw boundaries that were never clearly set.

Featured image from Pixabay, chart from TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, what activity related to blockchain software is protected under the First Amendment?

AHester Peirce stated that publishing open-source blockchain software is a protected activity under the First Amendment.

QWhat key distinction is Hester Peirce drawing regarding blockchain code developers and legal liability?

AShe is drawing a distinction between writing blockchain code and being responsible for how it is used, arguing that legal liability should fall on those who engage in unlawful conduct, not necessarily on the developers who created the underlying tools.

QWhat broader regulatory shift at the SEC does Peirce's speech fit into?

AHer remarks fit into a wider rethinking at the SEC, led by Chair Paul Atkins, which is moving away from regulation by enforcement. The agency's Crypto Task Force is reviewing how existing securities laws apply to digital assets and decentralized systems.

QWhat recent SEC guidance suggests the agency is rethinking the application of traditional broker-dealer rules?

ARecent SEC staff guidance indicated that some front-end websites and software platforms providing access to decentralized protocols may not qualify as brokers under the traditional legal definition.

QHow does the SEC's draft Strategic Plan through fiscal 2030 characterize blockchain and crypto assets?

AThe SEC's draft Strategic Plan described blockchain and crypto assets as technologies with the potential to reshape America's financial infrastructure, signaling they will remain a long-term priority.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbit5 хв тому

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbit5 хв тому

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbit15 хв тому

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbit15 хв тому

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

Economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) suggest that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race may not be the country developing the most powerful AI model, but the one whose currency underpins these models and their infrastructure. Their thesis outlines a potential cycle where AI-related costs—such as energy for data centers, infrastructure, and usage fees—are denominated in U.S. dollars. As AI grows into a massive industry, this could significantly increase global demand for U.S. dollar liquidity (first channel of dollar dominance). A second channel involves the currency used for payments between AI agents, expected to become widespread in logistics, inventory, and treasury management. Dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for such agent commerce. These two channels may converge, creating a self-reinforcing "dollar loop" where AI computational payments are settled in stablecoins. Stablecoins could gain an early advantage over alternatives like CBDCs due to existing network effects, further entrenching dollar dominance. This would also boost demand for U.S. Treasury bonds used as collateral for stablecoin reserves. The report warns ASEAN+3 nations of over-reliance on this dollar loop and suggests developing regional data centers and tokenized money based on local currencies to participate in the AI economy without reinforcing dollar dependency.

cryptonews.ru17 хв тому

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

cryptonews.ru17 хв тому

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

Base, a layer-2 blockchain, argues that its established distribution network will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge. While Robinhood Chain quickly attracted 230,000 daily active users and over $9 billion in DEX volume (primarily from meme coins) shortly after launch, its core feature of tokenized stocks saw minimal use. Base acknowledged shortcomings in focusing on social blockchain products and lagging in areas like perpetual contracts, predictions markets, and on-chain tokenized stocks—a move Robinhood got right. In response, Base highlights its nearly three-year head start in building infrastructure. It emphasizes its x402 payment protocol, which has processed 187.8 million agent payments, its $3.9 billion in stablecoin deposits (mostly USDC), and its integration with partners like Visa, Shopify, and JPMorgan for institutional and merchant settlements. Base contends these capabilities for corporate payments and stablecoin liquidity represent a more durable and defensible ecosystem than Robinhood's retail trading metrics. Coinbase plans to launch its own on-chain, share-backed tokenized stocks on Base, which would directly challenge Robinhood's key differentiating feature. Base's strategy bets that its deep-rooted distribution and institutional partnerships will prove harder to overcome than Robinhood's early, meme-driven volume, which may fade after the initial launch hype.

cryptonews.ru20 хв тому

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

cryptonews.ru20 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片