SEC Drops Civil Lawsuit Against Gemini Trust Company

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-24

Анотація

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has dismissed its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company with prejudice, meaning the case cannot be reopened. This decision follows the full repayment of crypto assets to all affected Gemini Earn users through the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024. The SEC cited the complete return of investors' crypto and the resolution of harm as key reasons for dropping the lawsuit. The case originated from a 2020 partnership between Gemini and Genesis, which froze $900 million in user assets during the 2023 market downturn. Gemini contributed significant funds and penalties to help resolve the situation and settle with regulators.

The Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States has officially dismissed its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company. This move indicates a major comfort for the crypto exchange founders Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss.

The decision is followed by Gemini Earn users getting all their crypto back, bringing an end to a long legal case that initiated in 2023. As per the filing of 23rd January 2026, the SEC and Gemini Trust Company came together to drop the case with prejudice, which means it can’t be opened in the future.

The Securities and Exchange Commission mentioned that the decision was made using its own judgement, with investor repayment playing a significant role. All Gemini Earn users who were affected got a complete return of their crypto assets. The repayment wasn’t done in cash, and it was completed via the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024.

The SEC further mentioned that after returning users’ crypto completely, the harm to investors was prominently reduced. The regulator also highlighted that Gemini has so far settled associated issues with a lot of state regulators.

The Complete Closure

Amalgamated, these steps backed the decision to completely drop the lawsuit. The case traces back to December 2020, when Gemini collaborated with Genesis, a crypto lending firm associated with Digital Currency Group.

As per this arrangement, Gemini users could lend their crypto to Genesis and get interest payments. Problems initiated when Genesis broke at the time of the wider crypto market downturn.

Withdrawals got frozen, and $900 million in crypto assets were left, associated with around 340,000 users locked and inaccessible. For resolving the situation, Gemini contributed around $40 million in Bitcoin and $10 million in other assets.

It further contributed a $37 million penalty for a different settlement with New York regulators. Gradually, Gemini worked through various legal and regulatory processes at state as well as federal levels, having the complete repayment of users appearing as the prominent milestone in terminating the case.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

ARK Invest Enters Broader Crypto ETFs With CoinDesk 20

Пов'язані питання

QWhy did the SEC dismiss its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company?

AThe SEC dismissed the lawsuit based on its own judgment, citing the complete repayment of crypto assets to Gemini Earn users as a significant factor that reduced investor harm.

QWhat does the dismissal 'with prejudice' mean for the case against Gemini?

AA dismissal 'with prejudice' means the case is permanently closed and cannot be reopened or refiled in the future.

QHow and when were the affected Gemini Earn users repaid their crypto assets?

AThe repayment was completed in-kind (not in cash) through the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024.

QWhat was the initial problem that led to the SEC's lawsuit against Gemini?

AThe lawsuit stemmed from a program where Gemini users lent crypto to Genesis, which then froze withdrawals during a market downturn, locking up $900 million in assets belonging to 340,000 users.

QWhat other significant financial contributions did Gemini make to resolve this situation?

ABeyond facilitating user repayments, Gemini contributed $40 million in Bitcoin, $10 million in other assets, and paid a $37 million penalty in a separate settlement with New York regulators.

Пов'язані матеріали

A 120,000 Yuan Tombstone or 399 Yuan AI Immortality: Which Would You Choose?

"The 'Deathcare Moutai' Fushouyuan, once a highly profitable cemetery operator, has halted trading amid a severe crisis, with its net profit plummeting by 52.8% in 2024. This reflects a broader trend of people rejecting expensive traditional burials, as average grave prices in China have soared to over ¥120,000. In response, the industry is pivoting to digital alternatives, with companies like Fushouyuan offering AI-powered memorial services, such as virtual farewell halls and AI-generated recreations of the deceased. Simultaneously, a low-cost, unregulated AI 'resurrection' industry has emerged online, with services priced as low as ¥399. These often use open-source tools to create crude digital avatars from photos and voice clips, exploiting vulnerable individuals, particularly bereaved parents who have lost their only child. However, these services raise significant ethical and legal concerns, including data privacy risks and potential use in scams. Academic studies warn that such AI companions may exacerbate grief, leading to prolonged mourning disorders and emotional dependency, rather than providing genuine comfort. While regulations are being drafted to manage digital human services, the deep emotional drive to 'reconnect' with loved ones often overshadows rational concerns. Ultimately, the article questions whether digital immortality truly preserves memory or merely offers a commercialized illusion, emphasizing that no technology can replace the real, irreplaceable loss of a human life."

marsbit4 хв тому

A 120,000 Yuan Tombstone or 399 Yuan AI Immortality: Which Would You Choose?

marsbit4 хв тому

Exploring Bitcoin Valuation in 2026 from Macro and On-Chain Structural Perspectives

Tiger Research analyzes Bitcoin's valuation outlook for 2026 from macro and on-chain perspectives. Despite a 27% price drop in Q1, the macro environment remains supportive. Global M2 hit a record $13.44 trillion, but Chinese liquidity, which contributed over 60% of M2 growth, has limited access to Bitcoin markets. The Iran conflict pushed oil prices higher, raising March CPI to 3.3% and narrowing the Fed's rate cut path. However, the easing direction remains intact. Bitcoin ETF flows turned positive in March after five months of outflows, and corporate accumulation continues. On-chain metrics show a shift from undervaluation to early equilibrium. Key indicators like MVRV-Z and NUPL have exited panic zones. The critical resistance is at $78k, the long-term holder cost basis, while the key support is at $54k. Although transaction counts increased, active addresses and average transfer size declined, indicating superficial growth rather than real network expansion. BTCFi ecosystem growth has weakened, leading to a -10% adjustment in fundamental metrics. The 12-month price target is set at $143k, based on a $132.5k neutral benchmark adjusted by -10% (fundamentals) and +20% (macro). This represents a 103% upside from current levels. Short-term catalysts include a break above $78k, sustained ETF inflows, and a Fed policy shift post-geopolitical de-escalation.

marsbit23 хв тому

Exploring Bitcoin Valuation in 2026 from Macro and On-Chain Structural Perspectives

marsbit23 хв тому

Anthropic Starts Poaching Scientists? $27K Weekly Onsite Stipend to Fix Claude's Expert-Level Errors

Anthropic has launched a new STEM Fellow program, offering $3,800 per week for a three-month, in-person residency in San Francisco. The role targets experts from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields—machine learning experience is helpful but not required. Instead, Anthropic values scientific judgment and a willingness to learn quickly. Fellows will work with Claude models and internal tools under the guidance of an Anthropic researcher. Example projects include a materials scientist identifying errors in Claude’s reasoning or a climate scientist integrating atmospheric modeling software with Claude. The goal is to have experts "tell Claude where it's wrong" and improve its scientific capabilities. This initiative is part of Anthropic’s broader strategy to strengthen its scientific ecosystem, following earlier programs like the AI Safety Fellows and AI for Science programs. The company acknowledges that current AI models, while powerful, still produce high-confidence errors and lack end-to-end research autonomy. The program aims to embed domain expertise directly into model development, turning scientists into "high-level reviewers" for AI. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has previously emphasized AI’s potential to accelerate scientific breakthroughs, particularly in biology and healthcare. The company believes that the next phase of AI competition will depend not on scaling parameters, but on integrating human expertise to refine model accuracy and reliability.

marsbit54 хв тому

Anthropic Starts Poaching Scientists? $27K Weekly Onsite Stipend to Fix Claude's Expert-Level Errors

marsbit54 хв тому

VCs Sticking to the Primary Market: How Much Money Do They Still Have?

The article discusses the current state of the cryptocurrency venture capital (VC) market, based on a debate among investors from firms like Pantera Capital, Crucible Capital, and others. Key insights reveal that while VC funds are not short on capital, there is a scarcity of high-quality investment opportunities. The discussion highlights a structural shift: early-stage funding is more dispersed and competitive, with many smaller funds active, but later-stage growth capital is highly concentrated among a few large players like Paradigm and Pantera. Data indicates that over 80% of funding in 2026 went to later rounds, but this includes "graduated" fintech projects that have entered traditional VC realms. The core issue is not the availability of money, but its distribution and accessibility—early-stage founders face intense competition for funding, while later-stage funding is gatekept by a handful of major firms. This reflects a broader trend where VCs are being more selective, prioritizing long-term, proven projects over narrative-driven investments, and founders must demonstrate substantial progress and resilience to secure capital.

Odaily星球日报56 хв тому

VCs Sticking to the Primary Market: How Much Money Do They Still Have?

Odaily星球日报56 хв тому

Little Pepe ($LILPEPE) Builds Strong Investment Case With Potential 50x–100x Returns for Early Buyers

Little Pepe ($LILPEPE) is gaining significant attention as a promising crypto project, having raised nearly $28 million in its ongoing presale. The token price is currently $0.0022 and will increase to $0.0023 in the next stage, incentivizing early investment. The project highlights a potential 50x to 100x return for early buyers, targeting prices of $0.11 to $0.22 from the current near $0.01 value, though returns depend on market conditions. Beyond being a meme coin, Little Pepe offers utility through its Ethereum-based Layer 2 blockchain, featuring zero tax trades, bot protection, staking, a meme launchpad, and DAO governance. Additional incentives include a $77,000 token giveaway for ten participants and rewards for top contributors. While high-risk, the project's strong presale performance and functional ecosystem make it an attractive opportunity for investors seeking substantial returns.

TheNewsCrypto1 год тому

Little Pepe ($LILPEPE) Builds Strong Investment Case With Potential 50x–100x Returns for Early Buyers

TheNewsCrypto1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси