SEC Chairman confirms U.S. crypto bill nears finish line: Details

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-20

Анотація

The long-standing tension between Washington and the crypto industry is easing as SEC Chairman Paul Atkins confirms the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 is ready for presidential review. The SEC and CFTC are now cooperating to align regulations, ending years of conflict. The bill clearly divides oversight: the CFTC will regulate decentralized digital commodities like Bitcoin, while the SEC handles investment-style tokens. A "maturity clause" allows tokens to transition from SEC to CFTC oversight once their networks become sufficiently decentralized. This regulatory clarity could unlock institutional adoption and real-world asset tokenization, potentially ending crypto’s regulatory winter and fostering innovation. Despite recent market pressures, the bill represents a significant step toward legal certainty.

The long-standing tension between Washington and the crypto industry is beginning to ease.

Recently, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins confirmed that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 is ready to be presented to the U. S. President.

More importantly, he revealed that the SEC and the CFTC are no longer fighting over control and are instead working together to align their rules.

Why hasn’t the crypto market reacted?

However, this comes at a time when crypto prices are under pressure.

As per data from CoinMarketCap, the total market value has fallen to $3.08 trillion, at press time, down by 1.92% in the past 24 hours. However, this drop is mainly because of Donald Trump’s tariff shock.

This sudden shift in global economies raised fears about tighter global liquidity, pushing investors away from riskier assets like Bitcoin [BTC] and altcoins.

The fight is over

That being said, for years, crypto projects were stuck between the SEC and the CFTC, unsure which rules applied to them. However, this new bill is different as it clearly divides responsibility.

Once passed, the CFTC would oversee digital commodities, such as Bitcoin and other decentralized assets. Meanwhile, the SEC would regulate investment-style tokens, especially during early fundraising stages.

Additionally, the bill is also designed to introduce a key idea called the “maturity clause.”

Once a blockchain network becomes decentralized and stable enough, its token could move out of SEC oversight and fall under the CFTC instead.

This could stop the endless cycle of enforcement actions that have hurt crypto innovation in the U.S.

More than trading

Needless to say, this bill isn’t just about crypto exchanges. It also lays the groundwork for tokenizing real-world assets.

With clear legal rules, things like bonds, funds, and stablecoins could be issued and traded on blockchains. This makes it easier for traditional finance firms to move on-chain.

Remarking on Atkins’s remarks, an X user said,

“If market structure is finally being clarified, that’s a big unlock. Clear rules don’t slow innovation, they let real infrastructure scale.”

Echoing similar sentiments, another X user added,

“Things are about to get parabolic.”

What changed?

Under former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the crypto industry often navigated a regulatory tightrope. With President Trump back in office, however, the tone in Washington has shifted.

While Gensler’s departure has clearly opened the door to greater cooperation, the path to full regulatory clarity remains uneven.

As Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley recently noted, while progress is being made, significant clarity gaps remain.

Still, regardless of what lies ahead, this reform has been overdue for years, and it now finally appears within reach.

Ergo, one X user responded best to Atkins’s remarks when he said,

“This is huge clarity has been missing for years.”


Final Thoughts

  • Regulatory alignment between the SEC and CFTC ends years of jurisdictional uncertainty and enforcement-first policy.
  • If lawmakers bridge the remaining gaps, 2026 could mark the end of crypto’s regulatory winter and the start of institutional spring.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name of the crypto bill that is nearing the finish line, as confirmed by the SEC Chairman?

AThe Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025.

QAccording to the article, which two regulatory bodies have stopped fighting and are now working together to align their rules?

AThe SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission).

QHow does the new bill propose to divide regulatory oversight between the SEC and CFTC?

AThe CFTC would oversee digital commodities like Bitcoin, while the SEC would regulate investment-style tokens, especially during early fundraising stages.

QWhat is the 'maturity clause' introduced in the bill?

AIt is a clause that allows a token to move out of SEC oversight and fall under the CFTC once its blockchain network becomes decentralized and stable enough.

QWhat event, unrelated to the bill, does the article cite as the main reason for the recent drop in crypto market value?

ADonald Trump's tariff shock, which raised fears about tighter global liquidity.

Пов'язані матеріали

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit4 хв тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit4 хв тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1 год тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1 год тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片