San Francisco Federal Reserve President Mary Daly Seeks Lower Inflation, Will it Impact Cryptocurrencies?

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-19

Анотація

San Francisco Federal Reserve President Mary Daly emphasized the need to further lower inflation, despite the current rate of 2.40% being close to the Fed's 2% target. She highlighted the role of restrictive policies and AI in achieving this, while also expressing concerns about labor market vulnerabilities. Lower inflation could boost investor confidence and potentially benefit riskier assets like cryptocurrencies. However, the crypto market is currently experiencing volatility, with Bitcoin dropping below $67k amid broader geopolitical worries. The article notes that multiple factors influence crypto prices, urging thorough research before investing. It concludes by mentioning Donald Trump's ambition to make the U.S. a global crypto hub, despite ongoing challenges like trade tensions with China.

San Francisco Federal Reserve President Mary Daly has sought to further lower inflation. The statement aligns with the target range of 2%. But, it goes on to raise a question if there will be a rate cut, considering that it affects investment appetite in cryptocurrencies. US markets last closed higher, signalling a decent strength at a time of uncertainty.

Mary Daly on Inflation

The US January 2026 inflation rate is 2.40%, closer to the target mark of 2%; however, Mary Daly has said that there is still a need to further lower the inflation. The San Francisco Federal Reserve President has acknowledged that while Artificial Intelligence (AI) helps in that aspect, it is also the restrictive policy that makes things happen.

Inflation is not the only concern, she said during an event at San Jose State University. Mary also said that there is a need to check that labor market vulnerabilities don’t turn into labor market fragilities. Cutting the rate becomes important for investors to allocate their funds to riskier ventures, cryptocurrencies in this case.

Interestingly, Jeffery Schmid, Kansas City Federal Reserve President, earlier took a dig at rate cuts.

Impact on Cryptocurrencies

A lower inflation rate essentially helps portray a strong economy. Thereby instilling a sense of confidence among investors to broaden their respective portfolios. Currently, cryptocurrencies are still experiencing volatility, with BTC, as it appears, losing its momentum. The token has dropped to $66,873.53, below $67k, after losing 1.85% of its value in the last 24 hours.

The market has collectively lost 1.71% in the market cap with the FGI shifting lower to 11 points. Investors worry over ongoing geopolitical scenarios. This has sidelined a drop in inflation, which could have otherwise worked in favor of the crypto market.

Simply put, there are several factors that impact cryptocurrencies. It is important to do thorough research and risk assessment before crypto investments.

Will America Become a Global Crypto Hub?

Donald Trump committed to make the US a global crypto hub; however, challenges keep coming up for the country. A report by Reuters has highlighted China’s plan to dominate global trade in the times to come. The Asian nation is reportedly pursuing 20 FTAs, free trade agreements, as the US extends its tariff war.

Nevertheless, US stock markets closed higher earlier. S&P 500 and Nasdaq were up by 0.56% and 0.78%, respectively. Dow also saw a growth of 0.26%.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Kresus Secures $13M Strategic Investment from Hanwha Investment & Securities

TagsCryptocurrencyFederal ReserveInflation Rate

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the target inflation rate mentioned by San Francisco Federal Reserve President Mary Daly?

AThe target inflation rate mentioned is 2%.

QHow has the recent inflation rate in the US performed relative to the target?

AThe US January 2026 inflation rate is 2.40%, which is closer to the target mark of 2%.

QWhat was the recent price movement of Bitcoin as mentioned in the article?

ABitcoin dropped to $66,873.53, below $67k, after losing 1.85% of its value in the last 24 hours.

QAccording to the article, what is one reason cutting interest rates is important for the cryptocurrency market?

ACutting the rate is important for investors to allocate their funds to riskier ventures, such as cryptocurrencies.

QWhich US stock market indices closed higher, and by how much?

AThe S&P 500 was up by 0.56%, the Nasdaq was up by 0.78%, and the Dow saw a growth of 0.26%.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit5 хв тому

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit5 хв тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1 год тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1 год тому

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbit1 год тому

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片