Rolling the Snowball in a Cold Market: How a Meme Coin Achieved 20x in 2 Days with an Automated Market-Making Mechanism?

比推Опубліковано о 2025-12-22Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-22

Анотація

**Summary: Snowball Meme Coin’s 20x Surge in 2 Days via Automated Market-Making Mechanism Amid a sluggish crypto market, the Meme token Snowball, launched on pump.fun on December 18, surged 20 times in value within two days, reaching a $10 million market cap—a rare success in the current bearish environment. Its core innovation lies in an automated market-making mechanism designed to create a "snowball effect." Typically, pump.fun tokens allow creators to collect a fee (0.5%–1%) from each transaction, often leading to devs cashing out and abandoning projects. Snowball redirects 100% of this creator fee to an on-chain market-making bot instead. This bot periodically: 1. Uses accumulated funds to buy back tokens, creating buy pressure. 2. Adds purchased tokens and corresponding SOL to the liquidity pool, improving depth. 3. Burns 0.1% of tokens per operation, inducing deflation. The fee rate fluctuates (0.05%–0.95%) based on market cap: higher fees at lower caps to accelerate fund accumulation, lower fees at higher caps to reduce transaction friction. The idea is that each trade fuels buy pressure and liquidity, not dev profits, theoretically creating a self-sustaining cycle: trading generates fees → fees fund buybacks → buybacks boost price → higher price attracts more trading. On-chain data shows 7,270 holders, with top 10 addresses holding ~20% of supply—relatively distributed. Trading volume reached $11 million in 24 hours, with buys slightly outpacing sells. By...

Author: David, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: 20x in 2 Days, A Quick Look at the Automated Market-Making Mechanism of the New Golden Dog Snowball


The crypto market in December is as cold as the weather.

On-chain transactions have been dormant for a long time, and new narratives are hard to come by. Just look at the drama and gossip in the Chinese CT (Crypto Twitter) these past few days, and you'll know hardly anyone is playing in this market anymore.

But the English-speaking community has been discussing something new.

A Meme coin called Snowball launched on pump.fun on December 18th. In four days, its market cap surged to $10 million and is still hitting new highs; meanwhile, it's barely mentioned in the Chinese crypto circle.

In the current environment where there are few new narratives and even Meme coins are considered unplayable, this is one of the few things that catches the eye and shows some localized wealth effect.

And the name Snowball itself, referring to the snowball effect, is the story it wants to tell:

A mechanism that allows the token to "roll and grow bigger by itself".

Turning Transaction Fees into Buy Pressure, Rolling the Snowball for Market Making

To understand what Snowball is doing, you need to first know how pump.fun tokens typically make money.

On pump.fun, anyone can create a token in minutes. Token creators can set a "creator fee," essentially taking a cut of every transaction into their own wallet, usually between 0.5% and 1%.

This money is theoretically meant for community building and marketing, but in practice, most Devs choose to: accumulate enough and then run.

This is part of the typical life cycle of a shitcoin. Launch, pump, harvest fees, rug. Investors aren't betting on the token itself, but on the developer's conscience.

Snowball's approach is to not take this creator fee money.

To be precise, 100% of the creator fees do not go into anyone's wallet but are automatically transferred to an on-chain market-making bot.

This bot performs three actions at regular intervals:

First, it uses the accumulated funds to buy tokens on the market, creating buy-side support;

Second, it adds the bought tokens and the corresponding SOL to the liquidity pool, improving trading depth;

Third, it burns 0.1% of the tokens with each operation, creating deflation.

Simultaneously, the percentage of creator fees this coin charges is not fixed; it fluctuates between 0.05% and 0.95% based on market cap.

It takes a higher percentage when the market cap is low, allowing the bot to accumulate ammunition faster; it reduces the fee when the market cap is high, decreasing transaction friction.

To summarize the logic of this mechanism in one sentence: every time you trade, a portion of the money automatically becomes buy pressure and liquidity, instead of going into the developer's pocket.

Therefore, it's easy to understand this snowball effect:

Trading generates fees → Fees become buy pressure → Buy pressure pushes the price up → Higher price attracts more trading → More fees... theoretically, it can roll on its own.

On-Chain Data Situation

Now that the mechanism is explained, let's look at the on-chain data.

Snowball launched on December 18th, so it's been four days now. The market cap grew from zero to $10 million, with a 24-hour trading volume exceeding $11 million.

For a shitcoin on pump.fun, this performance is considered relatively long-lasting in the current environment.

In terms of token distribution, there are currently 7,270 holder addresses. The top ten holders together account for about 20% of the total supply, with the largest single holder holding 4.65%.

Data source: surf.ai

There's no address holding 20-30% of the supply; the distribution is relatively decentralized.

Regarding trading data, there have been over 58,000 transactions since launch, with 33,000 buys and 24,000 sells. The total buy volume is $4.4 million, and the total sell volume is $4.3 million, resulting in a net inflow of about $100,000. Buying and selling are basically balanced, with no one-sided selling pressure.

The liquidity pool holds about $380,000, half in tokens and half in SOL. For a market cap of this size, the depth isn't very thick, and large orders would still experience significant slippage.

Another noteworthy point is that Bybit Alpha announced listing the token less than 96 hours after launch, which to some extent confirms the short-term hype.

Perpetual Motion Meets a Cold Market

After browsing around, you can see that the English community's discussion about Snowball mainly focuses on the mechanism itself. Supporters' logic is straightforward:

This is the first Meme coin that locks 100% of creator fees into the protocol; developers can't run away with the money, making it structurally safer than other shitcoins, at least.

The development Dev is also playing into this narrative. The developer wallet, market-making bot wallet, and transaction logs are all public, emphasizing "verifiable on-chain."

@bschizojew labels himself as "on-chain schizophrenia, 4chan special forces, first-generation Meme coin veteran," radiating a self-deprecating degen vibe that appeals to the crypto-native community.

But mechanism safety and making money are two different things.

The snowball effect relies on the premise that there is sufficient trading volume to continuously generate fees to feed the bot for buybacks. More trading means more ammunition for the bot, stronger buy pressure, higher prices, attracting more people to trade...

This is the ideal state where any Meme coin's so-called buyback flywheel spins up in a bull market.

The problem is, the flywheel needs external momentum to start.

What is the current crypto market environment? On-chain activity is sluggish, the overall heat around Meme coins has declined, and there's simply less capital willing to chase shitcoins. In this context, if new buy-side pressure doesn't keep up and trading volume shrinks, the fees the bot receives will become less and less, buyback strength will weaken, price support will diminish, and trading willingness will decline further.

The flywheel can spin forward, but it can also spin in reverse.

A more realistic problem is that the mechanism solves only one risk point—"developers taking the money and running"—but Meme coins face far more risks than that.

Whales dumping, insufficient liquidity, narratives going out of style—if any of these happen, 100% fee-based buybacks can only do so much.

Everyone is tired of being rugged. A Chinese community member summarized it quite well:

Play if you want, but don't get in over your head.

More Than One Snowball Rolling

Snowball isn't the only project telling this automated market-making story.

Within the pump.fun ecosystem, a token called FIREBALL is doing something similar: automatic buybacks and burns, packaging it as a protocol other tokens can plug into. But its market cap is much smaller than Snowball's.

This shows the market is currently reacting to the direction of "mechanism-based Meme coins."

The traditional玩法 of shilling, pumping, and community hype is finding it harder to attract capital. Using mechanism design to tell a "structurally safe" story might be one of Meme coins' recent strategies.

However, talking about artificially creating a mechanism isn't a new玩法 either.

OlympusDAO's (3,3) in 2021 was the most typical case, using game theory to package a staking mechanism and telling the story of "everyone profits if no one sells." It reached a peak market cap of billions of dollars. The ending, as everyone knows, was a death spiral, dropping over 90%.

Earlier, there was Safemoon's玩法 of "taxing every transaction and distributing it to holders," also a narrative of mechanism innovation, which ended with the SEC suing and charging the founder with fraud.

Mechanisms can be great narrative hooks, gathering capital and attention in the short term, but mechanisms themselves do not create value.

When external capital stops flowing in, even the most精巧designed flywheel will stop.

Finally, let's recap what this little golden dog is actually doing:

Turning Meme coin creator fees into an "automated market-making bot." The mechanism itself isn't complicated, and the problem it solves is very clear: preventing developers from directly taking the money and running.

Developers can't run away, but that doesn't mean you'll make money.

If after reading this you find the mechanism interesting and want to participate, remember one thing: it's first and foremost a Meme coin, and only secondly an experiment with a new mechanism.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Channel: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7597578

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core mechanism that allows Snowball to achieve its 'snowball effect'?

AThe core mechanism is that 100% of the creator fees from transactions are automatically sent to an on-chain market-making bot. This bot uses the accumulated funds to buy back tokens (creating buy pressure), add the purchased tokens and corresponding SOL to the liquidity pool (improving depth), and burn 0.1% of the tokens (creating deflation) at regular intervals.

QHow does the creator fee for the Snowball token work and how is it different from a typical pump.fun token?

AUnlike typical pump.fun tokens where the fee goes to the developer's wallet, Snowball's creator fee (which floats between 0.05% and 0.95% based on market cap) is entirely sent to an automated market-making bot. This prevents the developer from directly taking the money and running, as the funds are instead used to support the token's price and liquidity.

QWhat were some key on-chain metrics for Snowball four days after its launch?

AFour days after its launch on December 18th, Snowball reached a market cap of $10 million, with a 24-hour trading volume exceeding $11 million. It had 7,270 holder addresses, with the top 10 holders owning about 20% of the supply. The liquidity pool held approximately $380,000.

QAccording to the article, what is the major risk or prerequisite for the 'snowball effect' to work?

AThe major risk is that the 'snowball effect' relies on sufficient trading volume to continuously generate fees to fuel the market-making bot. If new buying pressure dries up and trading volume decreases, the bot's ability to support the price weakens, which could lead to a negative feedback loop where decreasing price support further reduces trading interest.

QHow does the article contextualize Snowball's mechanism within the history of crypto 'mechanism narratives'?

AThe article contextualizes it as part of a trend of 'mechanism-based meme coins' seeking to attract attention with structural innovation. It draws parallels to past projects like OlympusDAO's (3,3) staking mechanism and Safemoon's transaction tax redistribution, noting that while mechanisms can be a good short-term narrative, they do not create intrinsic value and can fail when external capital inflow stops.

Пов'язані матеріали

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit5 хв тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit5 хв тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit46 хв тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit46 хв тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit2 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit2 год тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit2 год тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Що таке MEME 2.0

Memecoin 2.0: Поява $MEME 2.0 у світі криптовалюти Вступ У постійно змінному ландшафті криптовалюти з'явився новий претендент. Memecoin 2.0, що символізується як $MEME 2.0, підносить концепцію мем-криптовалют на захоплюючий новий рівень. Як побічний продукт оригінального Memecoin, цей проєкт привернув увагу крипто-спільноти, змістивши акцент з типової фінансової вигоди на захоплюючий і розважальний досвід. Працюючи на блокчейні Ethereum, Memecoin 2.0 сміливо переосмислює залучення спільноти у криптосфері. Що таке Memecoin 2.0, $MEME 2.0? У своїй основі, Memecoin 2.0 є криптовалютним проєктом, який надає пріоритет спільнотному духу і розвагам, пов'язаним з мем-культурою. На відміну від звичайних криптовалют, які зосереджені на практичних випадках використання та матеріальних вигодах, Memecoin 2.0 вирізняється тим, що обіймає легшу сторону цифрової валюти. Цей проєкт існує без обіцянок утиліти, структурованої дорожньої карти чи фінансових повернень, зосереджуючи увагу на створенні яскравої спільноти навколо мемів та спільних розваг. Зробивши це, він використовує зростаючу тенденцію мем-культури у онлайн-пробі, що робить його унікальним гравцем у світі цифрових активів. Творець Memecoin 2.0, $MEME 2.0 Не зважаючи на численні дослідження витоків Memecoin 2.0, чітка особистість його творця залишається невідомою. Ця анонімність не є рідкістю у крипто-спільноті, де багато проєктів очолюються особами або групами, які надають перевагу залишатися за лаштунками. Відсутність публічно доступної інформації про творця може розглядатися як стратегічний крок, що ставить в центр уваги залучення спільноти, а не індивідуальної популярності у цій сфері. Інвестори Memecoin 2.0, $MEME 2.0 Інформації щодо інвесторів або фінансової підтримки Memecoin 2.0 замало. Відсутність деталей може свідчити про те, що проєкт є самофінансованим або що його увага до спільноти, а не традиційних інвестиційних структур, привабила інший тип підтримки. Оскільки світ мем-криптовалют зазвичай передбачає більше участі низового рівня, а не інституційних інвестицій, цей підхід узгоджується з етосом проєктів, що управляються спільнотою. Як працює Memecoin 2.0, $MEME 2.0? Memecoin 2.0 повністю працює на блокчейні Ethereum, використовуючи його потужні функції безпеки та масштабованості. Використовуючи сильні сторони Ethereum, Memecoin 2.0 може запропонувати безпечне середовище для взаємодії користувачів, забезпечуючи при цьому, що транзакції є ефективними та економічними. Одна з унікальних характеристик Memecoin 2.0 полягає в його структурі, що керується спільнотою. Цінність та популярність токена $MEME 2.0 походять з активної участі його користувачів, а не з вродженої утиліти. Ця концепція підкреслює акцент проєкту на розважальному аспекті криптовалюти, натякаючи на те, що сміх та залучення спільноти є справжніми валютами, що ведуть до його успіху. Крім того, проєкт вписується в ширшу екосистему мем-криптовалют, де цінність кожної мем-криптовалюти коливається залежно від культури, тенденцій і участі спільноти, а не традиційних економічних принципів. Хронологія Memecoin 2.0, $MEME 2.0 Щоб краще зрозуміти еволюцію та віхи Memecoin 2.0, ось хронологія, що підкреслює значні події в його історії: 2024: Зародження Memecoin 2.0 вважається відгалуженням оригінального Memecoin, яке встановлює себе в процвітаючому контексті мем-криптовалют, працюючи на блокчейні Ethereum. 13 липня 2024: Memecoin 2.0 офіційно позиціонує себе як мем-криптовалюта, орієнтована на спільноту, в мережі Ethereum, підкреслюючи свій підхід, зосереджений на розвагах, який запрошує користувачів брати участь у його розвитку. Ключові моменти про Memecoin 2.0, $MEME 2.0 Кілька критичних характеристик визначають Memecoin 2.0: Спільнотно-центричний підхід: Основною метою Memecoin 2.0 є створення веселого, захоплюючого досвіду для спільноти, використовуючи колективне задоволення, що випливає з меметичної культури. Побудовано на Ethereum: Робота на блокчейні Ethereum надає проєкту важливу інфраструктуру, що забезпечує безпеку та масштабованість. Відсутність утиліти або дорожньої карти: У вражаючому відході від традиційних криптовалют, Memecoin 2.0 не обіцяє жодних утилітарних функцій або фінансових повернень, підтверджуючи свою прихильність до участі спільноти та соціального залучення. Акцент на меметичній культурі: Обіймаючи гумористичні та культурні аспекти мем-періоду, Memecoin 2.0 надає платформу для користувачів для залучення до крипти офлайн та онлайн. Додатковий контекст: Значення мем-криптовалют Мем-криптовалюти з'явилися як окрема класифікація криптовалюти, часто керуючись гумором та легким підходом до торгівлі. Ці валюти, як правило, не мають значної утиліти або розробницьких дорожніх карт, залучаючи користувачів обіцянкою розваг, взаємодії в спільноті та культурної значущості. В рамках ширшої екосистеми криптовалют, мем-криптовалюти відновлюють важливість залучення спільноти, протистоячи лише прибутковим підходам. Проєкти, такі як Memecoin 2.0, відкривають еру, в якій розваги можуть гармонізувати з фінансовими прагненнями, перетворюючи блокчейн на ігровий майданчик для творчості та соціальної взаємодії. Висновок Memecoin 2.0, або $MEME 2.0, втілює нову хвилю криптовалюти, яка надає пріоритет залученню спільноти над жорсткими фінансовими структурами. Зосереджуючись на гуморі та соціальній взаємодії, він використовує захоплення навколо мем-культури. Працюючи на блокчейні Ethereum, Memecoin 2.0 використовує можливості технології, залишаючись непохитним у своїй прихильності до розважальної цінності цифрової валюти. Коли простір навколо криптовалют продовжує еволюціонувати, Memecoin 2.0 служить доказом того, що майбутнє цифрових активів може значною мірою залежати від спільних досвідів, сміху та надійних зв'язків у спільноті. У непередбачуваному світі крипто, можливо, радість може бути такою ж цінною, як і традиційний фінансовий прибуток.

113 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.04.04Оновлено 2024.12.03

Що таке MEME 2.0

Як купити MEME

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Memeland (MEME) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Memeland (MEME).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Memeland (MEME)Після придбання Memeland (MEME) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Memeland (MEME)Легко торгуйте Memeland (MEME) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

333 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити MEME

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни MEME (MEME).

活动图片