Ripple President Says Stablecoins Will Power Global Settlement

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-21

Анотація

Ripple President Monica Long asserts that stablecoins are set to become the foundation of global settlement systems, rather than an alternative payment rail. She emphasizes that fiat-pegged tokens will serve as the core infrastructure for cross-border transactions, with major institutions like Visa and Stripe integrating them into payment flows. Long predicts that within five years, stablecoins will be fully integrated into global payment systems as the default settlement layer. She also highlights the crypto industry's shift from a speculative phase to a "production era," marked by increased institutional adoption and practical utility. By 2026, she expects significant crypto integration among Fortune 500 companies, including tokenized assets, on-chain treasury bills, and programmable financial instruments directly embedded into corporate workflows. This transition positions crypto as the operating layer of modern finance.

The President of Ripple, Monica Long, has mentioned in a new thread on X that stablecoins will be the base of global settlement, not an alternative rail, mounting fiat-pegged tokens as the pillar of cross-border money movement instead of just a side experiment.

She highlighted Visa, Stripe and other prominent institutions so far, hardwiring them into payment flows and recognising business-to-business transactions as the growth engine, having corporates leverage digital dollars to unlock real-time liquidity and capital efficiency.

The thesis of Long lines up with a wider post on the website of Ripple, where she mentions that within about five years, stablecoins will be completely amalgamated into global payment systems and function as the default settlement layer for holders and fintechs.

Meanwhile, other analysts mention that regulated stablecoins are increasingly being made to directly integrate into bank and card-network rails, obscuring the line between crypto infrastructure and traditional clearing systems.

The Further Forecasts

Long withstands that the industry is withdrawing completely from the speculative phase and setting its foot into what she calls a production era of crypto. She also mentions that after one of the most exciting years witnessed by crypto, the industry is going into its production era.

She has also forecasted that in this year, we will witness the institutionalisation of crypto-trusted infrastructure, and actual utility will propel banks, corporates and providers from pilots to scale.

Crypto is no longer unpredictable; it is the operating layer of modern finance, she further states in a follow-up post, speculating that about 50% of Fortune 500 companies will have some form of virtual asset exposure or a formal “DAT strategy” by this year.

She further proposes that they will comprise tokenised assets, on-chain treasury bills, stablecoins and programmable financial instruments implanted directly into corporate treasury and capital-markets workflows.

The written outlook of Long at Ripple associates these themes altogether, mentioning 2026 as a defining year in which stablecoins will power global settlement.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bhutan to Launch Sei Validator in Q1, Explores Tokenization Ties

TagsRippleStablecoinxrp

Пов'язані питання

QWhat does Ripple's President, Monica Long, predict will be the foundation of global settlement?

AStablecoins will be the base of global settlement, not an alternative rail.

QAccording to the article, what is the role of stablecoins in the future of cross-border money movement?

AStablecoins will be the pillar of cross-border money movement, not just a side experiment.

QWhat does Monica Long call the new phase that the crypto industry is entering?

AShe calls it the 'production era' of crypto, moving away from the speculative phase.

QWhat percentage of Fortune 500 companies does Long speculate will have some form of virtual asset exposure by this year?

AAbout 50% of Fortune 500 companies will have some form of virtual asset exposure or a formal 'DAT strategy'.

QWhat year does the Ripple outlook mention as a defining year for stablecoins powering global settlement?

A2026 is mentioned as a defining year in which stablecoins will power global settlement.

Пов'язані матеріали

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit28 хв тому

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit28 хв тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit39 хв тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit39 хв тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片