Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, But Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

深潮Опубліковано о 2025-12-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-23

Анотація

At the Sibos 2025 conference, Swift announced a major evolution of its financial infrastructure by integrating a blockchain-based shared ledger to support tokenized assets and enable secure, real-time, and interoperable global transactions. The new system, built on Consensys' Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea, uses zk-EVM rollup technology to reduce costs and settlement times while meeting banking security standards. Over 30 major banks, including JPMorgan and Citibank, are participating in the pilot. The article reflects on Ripple’s long-standing effort to challenge traditional cross-border payments using XRP and RippleNet, which has seen adoption in retail and corporate remittances despite earlier regulatory challenges. However, Swift’s move represents a broader and more systemic shift. Unlike Ripple’s XRP-dependent model, Swift’s ledger is asset-agnostic, supporting CBDCs, stablecoins, and fiat currencies, and leverages its existing network of over 11,000 institutions. This transition marks a convergence of traditional and decentralized finance, enabling 24/7 settlement, reducing reliance on pre-funded accounts, and potentially freeing up trillions in trapped capital. By adopting a neutral, interoperable, and highly scalable blockchain framework, Swift is positioned to redefine global value transfer—moving from a legacy telegraphic model to a digitally-native, mathematically-verified system.

Author: Sanqing, Foresight News

During the Sibos 2025 conference in Frankfurt, Swift's Chief Business Officer Thierry Chilosi and Standard Chartered Bank's Global Head of Transaction Banking, Michael Spiegel, discussed a major transformation in global finance. As tokenization moves from pilot programs to reality, Swift officially announced the addition of a blockchain-based shared ledger to its infrastructure, aiming to achieve trusted and interoperable digital finance on a global scale. This ledger will serve as a secure, real-time transaction record between financial institutions, using smart contracts to validate transaction sequences and execute agreed-upon rules. It is designed to complement existing systems and seamlessly bridge traditional finance with tokenized assets.

Image Source: Swift Official Website

Although Swift did not explicitly state the technical platform when initially announcing this major development to the banking industry, Consensys CEO Joe Lubin revealed at the Token2049 conference in Singapore that Swift is leveraging the Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea to build its new payment settlement platform. By adopting Linea's zk-EVM rollup technology, Swift can significantly reduce costs and latency while meeting the financial industry's stringent requirements for 24/7 real-time settlement and security. Currently, over 30 top financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citibank, are preparing to participate in the pilot of this new blockchain-based payment rail built on Linea.

Ripple's In-Depth Efforts and Current Status

Before discussing Swift, we must revisit the pioneer that challenged the old system for over a decade: Ripple.

In 2012, Ripple emerged with the XRP Ledger (XRPL), with the core goal of replacing the inefficient Swift correspondent banking model. During this period, Ripple successfully built the global payment network RippleNet, connecting over 300 financial institutions. In fragmented markets like Southeast Asia, its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service demonstrated that XRP, as a bridge currency, could reduce cross-border settlement times from several days to just 3 to 5 seconds.

By 2020, affected by the U.S. SEC lawsuit, Ripple faced a blockade and stagnation in the U.S. market due to securities allegations. However, its global scale continued to expand. By 2022, its business had reached over 40 payment markets, with total payment volume doubling to approximately $30 billion.

In 2023, Ripple saw a turning point when a court ruled that XRP itself is not a security, marking a milestone victory for Ripple and the industry.

In August 2025, with the SEC completely abandoning its appeal, the five-year legal battle came to an end. The full clarification of its status led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its official entry into mainstream institutional asset allocation portfolios.

Today, Ripple is conducting cross-border payment and receipt businesses in multiple real-world scenarios, ranging from retail remittances (To C) to enterprise-level payments (To B).

In the retail sector, Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to bridge real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia, significantly reducing the pre-funding costs for overseas workers. Santander Bank offers transparent real-time transfers to its customers through the One Pay FX app. Meanwhile, the Southeast Asian payment platform Tranglo has significantly improved the efficiency of peso and baht conversions with the support of Ripple ODL.

At the enterprise level, American Express and PNC Bank use RippleNet to optimize B2B trade settlements and international payment collection experiences.

Additionally, in national infrastructure, Ripple is collaborating with over 20 countries, including Palau, Montenegro, and Bhutan, to develop CBDC platforms, applying blockchain technology to the issuance and清算 systems of sovereign currencies.

Why Did Swift Choose Linea?

When giants in the industry布局 the Ethereum ecosystem, they have shown a high degree of consistency in their preference for Layer 2 technology: Coinbase's Base chain is built on OP Stack, while Robinhood announced earlier this year the launch of Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum technology to support the tokenization and 24/7 trading of RWA.

This preference stems from L2's ability to leverage Ethereum's security while meeting high-performance demands through a modular architecture. Swift's choice of Linea over OP or Arbitrum lies in the core difference in underlying validation logic.

OP and Arbitrum use Optimistic Rollup, which operates on the logic of assuming transactions are valid by default and only verifying them if challenged. Asset withdrawals typically require a multi-day challenge period, which is a significant time cost for financial清算追求流动性.

Linea, on the other hand, uses zk-EVM, which provides instant validity proofs mathematically. For Swift and its partner banks, which need to process massive value settlements, zk-EVM not only offers faster finality but also ensures compliance verification while protecting transaction privacy.

Swift's choice of Linea embodies the first principle of capital operation: maximizing flow velocity.

Capital will flow like a fluid from low-velocity systems (requiring large amounts of idle准备金预存 in Nostro/Vostro accounts), high-friction systems (layers of correspondent bank fees), and slow-settlement systems (settlement taking days) of the traditional telegraphic instruction era to high-velocity, low-friction, fast-settlement blockchain digital systems.

Swift processes approximately $150 trillion in global payments annually. If it can achieve atomic-level reconciliation and 24/7 real-time settlement through Linea's technology stack, it means that trillions of dollars in准备金 currently积压 in the global financial system to hedge against清算 delays will be released and reinjected into the real economy.

As Consensys CEO Joe Lubin stated at the Token 2049 conference in Singapore, this is not merely a technological upgrade but the true convergence of TradFi and DeFi, marking the global value transfer protocol's official transition from the "Telegraphic Instruction Era" to the "Mathematical Verification Era."

The Significance of Swift Embracing Blockchain

As the global financial backbone network handling approximately $150 trillion in annual transaction volume, Swift's decision to build its ledger on Linea, an Ethereum Layer 2, signifies that blockchain technology will become the heart of mainstream finance.

Swift will eliminate fragmentation between different tokenized networks through unified technical standards, breaking down the long-standing barrier between TradFi and DeFi and implanting the efficiency genes of decentralized finance into the traditional清算 system.

Through a 24/7 operational real-time shared ledger, global financial institutions will no longer be limited by the cumbersome manual reconciliation and time-zone delays of the correspondent banking model. The massive amounts of idle capital currently积压 in correspondent bank accounts to hedge against清算 risk will be effectively released. This will enable the speed of capital flow to truly match the demands of the modern economy, ushering in a new era of global value transfer that is more transparent, lower cost, and更具互操作性.

Ripple struggled for a decade to build a new city based on the XRP Ledger outside the old system. However, the scale of financial institutions it currently connects appears势单力薄 compared to Swift's存量 network, which covers over 11,000 institutions across more than 200 countries.

The core threat from Swift lies in its "asset neutrality." Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which heavily relies on XRP as a bridge currency, Swift's blockchain ledger is designed to support multiple assets, including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs.

Banks within the Swift system can achieve instant settlement by upgrading their existing rails without bearing the volatility risk of a single asset. This combination of "存量优势 (incumbent advantage) + technical compliance" is giving Ripple its most bone-chilling challenge since its inception.

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core technological difference between Swift's chosen Linea and other Layer 2 solutions like Optimistic Rollups?

AThe core difference lies in the underlying verification logic. Linea uses zk-EVM (Zero-Knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine), which provides instant validity proofs for transactions. In contrast, Optimistic Rollups (like OP and Arbitrum) assume transactions are valid by default and only verify them if a challenge is issued, which introduces a multi-day withdrawal delay. For high-value financial settlements requiring speed and finality, zk-EVM's instant cryptographic verification is superior.

QHow did the resolution of Ripple's legal battle with the SEC in 2025 impact its business?

AThe resolution, with the SEC dropping its appeals in August 2025, provided full legal clarity for Ripple. This landmark victory led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its formal entry into the asset allocation lists of mainstream financial firms and solidifying its legitimacy in the market.

QWhat specific problem is Swift's new blockchain-based shared ledger designed to solve in global finance?

AIt is designed to solve the inefficiencies of the traditional correspondent banking model, including slow settlement times (taking days), high costs from intermediary fees, and the need for large amounts of pre-funded capital (Nostro/Vostro accounts) to hedge against settlement risk. The ledger enables secure, real-time, 24/7 settlement, releasing trapped capital and improving interoperability.

QWhy is Swift's approach considered a greater threat to Ripple than simply competing with its technology?

ASwift's threat stems from its 'asset neutrality' and immense existing network. Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which relies heavily on the XRP token as a bridge currency, Swift's ledger is designed to support multiple assets including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs. This allows Swift's vast network of over 11,000 banks to upgrade for instant settlement without exposure to the volatility of a single asset, leveraging its massive existing infrastructure.

QName one retail and one corporate use case where Ripple's technology is currently being implemented.

ARetail: Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to provide real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Corporate: American Express utilizes RippleNet to optimize its B2B trade settlement processes.

Пов'язані матеріали

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit29 хв тому

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit29 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit36 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit36 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手38 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手38 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手54 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手54 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити O

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку O1 exchange (O) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити O1 exchange (O).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої O1 exchange (O)Після придбання O1 exchange (O) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля O1 exchange (O)Легко торгуйте O1 exchange (O) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

155 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2026.06.19Оновлено 2026.06.19

Як купити O

Як купити PROS

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Pharos (PROS) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Pharos (PROS).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Pharos (PROS)Після придбання Pharos (PROS) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Pharos (PROS)Легко торгуйте Pharos (PROS) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

205 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2026.06.22Оновлено 2026.06.22

Як купити PROS

Що таке VERONA

I. Вступ до проекту VERONA - це блокчейн, створений для всіх, скрізь, через абстракцію ланцюга. Використовуючи свій загальний шар абстракції, VERONA вирізняється інтеграцією складних функцій блокчейну, таких як рахунки, підписи та взаємодія, безпосередньо на рівні протоколу. Цей підхід дозволяє взаємодіяти з блокчейн-додатками без необхідності розуміти основні технології.1) Основна інформація Назва: VERONA (VERONA)III. Пов'язані посилання Офіційне посилання на сайт: https://xion.burnt.com/ Біла книга: https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Експлорери: https://explorer.burnt.com/ Соціальні мережі: https://x.com/burnt_xion Примітка: Вступ до проекту взято з матеріалів, опублікованих або наданих офіційною командою проекту, які є лише для довідки і не є інвестиційною порадою. HTX не несе відповідальності за будь-які прямі або непрямі збитки, що виникають внаслідок цього.

137 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2026.06.22Оновлено 2026.06.22

Що таке VERONA

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни A (A).

活动图片