Rhythm X Zhihu Event Agenda Released: Skills Demo + Keynote Speech + Roundtable to Thoroughly Explain Agents and On-Chain Finance

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-04-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-04-17

Анотація

The recent dispute between EvoMap and Hermes over alleged抄袭, similar to the Claude and OpenClaw case, highlights a growing trend in the Agent ecosystem. These conflicts arise from competition over user choice—specifically, which Agent users select for similar tasks—and the definition of original core competencies. Such public disagreements indicate that competition among Agents has intensified to the point where founders are losing their composure. Ultimately, users hold the decision-making power. This issue foreshadows a broader challenge: as Agents become more numerous and capable, how should individuals navigate this evolving landscape? This topic will be explored in-depth at the upcoming event.

You must have some understanding of the incident where EvoMap accused Hermes of plagiarism.

Just like Claude accusing OpenClaw of plagiarism, similar incidents are bound to become increasingly common.

Because fundamentally, it's about territory: which Agent users choose for similar tasks, or where the boundaries of original core competitiveness lie within Agents. This dispute illustrates one thing—the competition among Agents has become so real that it can make founders lose their composure. The choice rests in the hands of users.

This is also an issue we will all soon face: as Agents become more numerous and capable of handling many tasks, what should we do? This is precisely the question we will explore at our event.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main topic of the upcoming event mentioned in the article?

AThe event will focus on Agent technology and on-chain finance, featuring Skills Demo, keynote speeches, and roundtable discussions to thoroughly explain these topics.

QWhat recent controversy in the Agent space does the article reference?

AThe article references the controversy where EvoMap accused Hermes of plagiarism, similar to how Claude accused OpenClaw of copying, indicating increasing competition among Agents.

QWhat does the article suggest about user choice in the Agent ecosystem?

AThe article suggests that users have the ultimate choice in selecting which Agent to use for similar tasks, and this user preference is driving intense competition among Agent developers.

QAccording to the article, why are founders of Agent projects becoming less calm?

AFounders are losing冷静 because competition among Agents has become so real and intense that it is leading to public accusations of plagiarism and disputes over original boundaries of core competitiveness.

QWhat key question does the article say the event will address regarding Agents?

AThe event will address the question of how users should navigate the growing number of Agents and the many tasks they can perform, exploring the challenges and choices in the Agent ecosystem.

Пов'язані матеріали

Crypto Industry Watches As Poland Advances Long-Delayed Regulatory Bill

Poland's parliament has passed a long-delayed cryptocurrency regulatory bill, driven by urgency following a fraud scandal at a local exchange. Prime Minister Donald Tusk cited the Zondacrypto case, where users lost access to funds and which had alleged Russian ties, as proof of the need for investor protections. The approved bill grants Poland's Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) broad powers to oversee the market, impose penalties, and block accounts or transactions. However, the legislation faces potential rejection, as it retains contentious account-blocking provisions that led President Karol Nawrocki to veto two prior versions. Critics argue it lacks sufficient judicial oversight. A third veto would prolong regulatory uncertainty as Poland races to align with the EU's MiCA framework by a July deadline. The bill prevailed over three other competing proposals in a parliamentary vote.

bitcoinist2 год тому

Crypto Industry Watches As Poland Advances Long-Delayed Regulatory Bill

bitcoinist2 год тому

Winter for Crypto IPOs: Consensys and Ledger Withdraw Applications

The crypto IPO window is tightening significantly in 2026, marked by prominent companies delaying or pausing their public listing plans. Following a successful 2025 "harvest year" that saw Circle, Bullish, and Gemini go public amidst a bull market, the tide has turned. Consensys, developer of MetaMask, recently postponed its IPO until at least fall 2026. Hardware wallet leader Ledger also suspended its planned US listing due to unfavorable market conditions, with Kraken having previously delayed its own plans. This shift is driven by a cooling market in 2026, characterized by a significant Bitcoin price correction, declining trading volumes, and reduced investor risk appetite for crypto stocks. The poor post-IPO performance of 2025 listings like Circle and Bullish, which saw major share price declines, has heightened investor caution. This contrasts sharply with the current AI sector, where companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are commanding massive valuations and investor enthusiasm based on narratives of stable, exponential growth. Crypto companies now face pressure to transition from hype-driven models to demonstrating reliable cash flows and robust compliance. While the paused IPO plans may lead to valuation resets and affect ecosystem liquidity, they also accelerate industry consolidation toward stronger, more compliant infrastructure players. A potential recovery in Bitcoin's price and clearer regulations could reopen the IPO window in the latter half of 2026.

marsbit2 год тому

Winter for Crypto IPOs: Consensys and Ledger Withdraw Applications

marsbit2 год тому

ChatGPT Can Manage Your Money for You. Would You Trust It with Your Bank Account?

OpenAI has launched a personal finance tool for ChatGPT, currently in preview for US-based ChatGPT Pro users. This feature allows users to connect their bank and investment accounts (via Plaid, supporting over 12,000 institutions) directly to ChatGPT. It analyzes transactions, generates visual dashboards, and offers conversational financial advice—such as budgeting or planning for major purchases—based on the user's actual data. This move follows OpenAI's acquisitions of fintech startups Roi and Hiro Finance, signaling a strategic push into vertical "super assistant" applications, similar to its earlier health-focused feature. However, the launch has sparked significant privacy concerns. Critics question the safety of granting such sensitive financial access to an AI, especially amid ongoing lawsuits alleging OpenAI shared user chat data with third parties like Meta and Google. OpenAI emphasizes that ChatGPT only reads data (no transaction capabilities), deletes it within 30 days if disconnected, and offers opt-out options for model training. Yet, trust remains a major hurdle. The trend reflects a broader industry shift: AI companies like Anthropic and Perplexity are also targeting high-value, data-rich domains like finance and health. While technically promising, the tool operates in a regulatory gray area—it provides personalized guidance but disclaims formal financial advice or liability. Ultimately, OpenAI's challenge is convincing users to trust an AI with their most private financial information.

marsbit2 год тому

ChatGPT Can Manage Your Money for You. Would You Trust It with Your Bank Account?

marsbit2 год тому

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

In a notable development within the financial sector, two of the world's largest traditional exchanges, CME Group and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), have jointly filed a complaint with the U.S. Congress and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). They are demanding stricter regulatory oversight of the cryptocurrency derivatives platform Hyperliquid. This move signals escalating tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging digital asset trading venues, highlighting the ongoing regulatory debate surrounding the crypto industry.

marsbit2 год тому

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手6 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси