Reflections from the Co-founder of Bitlayer: After Helping 600 People Find Jobs in 15 Years, I Decided to Stop Doing Recruitment

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-28

Анотація

After 15 years of helping over 600 people find jobs, Bitlayer co-founder Kevin He reflects on his journey from being a passionate recruiter to pivoting toward a new vision: AI-powered "digital co-founders." He initially launched COCO AI in mid-2025 to optimize recruitment using AI, but soon realized traditional hiring was becoming less relevant. Companies were hiring less, and skill gaps persisted despite matching tools. A turning point came when his team built zylos, an AI system that handled tasks like social media, coding, and data processing—enabling one person to do the work of a team. This, combined with the rise of digital employees (like Claude Code and the success of Manus, acquired by Meta), shifted his perspective. He now believes the future lies in empowering individuals with organizational-level capabilities through AI, rather than optimizing job matching. COCO 2.0 is now focused on building “digital co-founders”—AI agents that help people start and run businesses alone, without needing to hire or be hired. The essay ends with an open question: In an era where AI augments individual potential, can one person become a company?

Author: Kevin He, Co-founder of Bitlayer

1. A Programmer and "Recruitment" for 15 Years

I am Kevin, an AI × Crypto entrepreneur, co-founder of Bitlayer, previously at Huobi, and a Peking University graduate.

From programmer to technical management, and then to entrepreneur, I have changed industry tracks several times over 15 years, always passionately engaged in recruitment-related work.

Over these 15 years, I have helped over 600 people successfully secure jobs. Some were formal recruitments, but more often, it was helping friends—finding jobs, introducing employees.

There are two stories I always keep in mind.

The first is helping a 35+ brother find a job. He has two children and was under great pressure. The moment he told me he received an offer, I was even more excited than he was.

The second is helping a startup team quickly build a R&D team. From zero to operational, it took less than two months. Watching the product launch, I felt I had participated in that creation.

This is why I love this work: achieving resource matching and genuinely helping people.

But recently, I started rethinking the premise of this work.

2. COCO 1.0: From Passion to Doubt

In June 2025, with support from various parties, I formed a small team and started incubating COCO AI.

The initial idea was simple: use AI to realize career advisors and career intermediaries. Make recruitment more efficient, help more people find good jobs.

The product evolved: resume optimization → AI job matching → AI corporate recruitment.

We created two products:

  • Job seeker end: job.coco.xyz

  • Enterprise end: company.coco.xyz

We invested significantly in technology, and the product was built.

But the Go-To-Market (GTM) wasn't as smooth as imagined.

I started reviewing and discovered several realities:

  • Companies' recruitment needs are decreasing: Due to the economic environment and improved organizational efficiency, many companies are no longer hiring on a large scale as before.

  • There is a gap between job seekers' skills and company requirements: AI can help with matching, but the gap itself won't disappear.

  • Job seekers' skills themselves need updating: Many people's abilities have fallen behind in the rapidly changing market.

I started doubting myself.

Was it a product problem? A market problem? Or—was the direction itself problematic?

I didn't have an answer at the time.

3. The Great Changes in the External World

The second half of 2025, the external world changed.

Claude Code began to be widely applied across various industries. Not just for writing code, but truly capable of completing complex tasks. More and more people around me started discussing a term: digital employees.

In December, we internally built a system called zylos, attempting to have AI handle daily work.

Tasks included:

  • Daily data reporting

  • Social media management

  • Code writing and testing

  • Data processing

  • Etc.

The results shocked me.

Tasks that previously required multiple people of different roles to complete could now be done just by assigning the task.

A specific example: social media operations.

Before, it required a dedicated person spending an hour daily: finding material, writing copy, formatting, publishing, replying to comments.

Now? Tell zylos, "Post one at 12:30 PM daily, content around XX theme, confirm with me before posting," and it's done in minutes.

From needing a dedicated person to needing none, from an hour daily to minutes.

The feeling was complex. Shock, excitement, but also a tinge of unease—what did this mean for the business I was building?

Around the same time, another piece of news arrived: Manus was acquired by Meta for billions of dollars.

Manus's annual revenue had already exceeded $100 million. This wasn't a concept, not a demo, but real commercial success.

I listened to Jiyichao's final podcast interview before the sale. One sentence he said impressed me deeply:

Digital employees aren't about replacing people, but enabling one person to do the work of a team.

This statement completely matched our experience testing zylos.

4. Cognitive Update

"One-Person Company" is not a new concept.

I had heard of it before and thought it made sense. But it always felt distant, too idealistic.

Until I saw zylos handle a large volume of tasks with my own eyes.

It didn't replace one specific person; it enabled me, as one person, to possess the capabilities of a small team.

In that moment, I decided to pivot.

I rethought what I had done over these 15 years.

  • Old cognition was: Talent is a scarce resource; helping companies find talent has value.
  • New cognition is: Capability enhancement is more important than talent matching. Helping individuals acquire organizational-level capabilities holds greater value.

This isn't negating the past 15 years. Those moments of helping people find jobs were still real and meaningful.

But I saw a new possibility:

  • Old paradigm: Individuals依附于(attach to) organizations; organizations acquire capabilities through hiring.

  • New paradigm: Individuals acquire organizational-level capabilities through AI, becoming independent units of creation.

The future trend is the era of one-person companies, not being employed by others.

5. COCO 2.0: Digital Co-founder

After figuring this out, the direction of COCO 2.0 changed.

Not helping you hire people, but helping you not need to hire people.

Not helping you find a job, but helping you create work.

What we are building is a "Digital Co-founder"—your AI联合创始人(Co-founder).

It has several core features:

  • Self-learning evolution: Not a fixed tool, but a partner that can continuously evolve based on your needs.

  • Secure and controllable: Your data, your business logic, all under your control.

  • Truly capable of doing things: Not a chat bot, but a digital employee that can complete complex tasks.

The specific product form is still being refined. But the direction is clear.

6. An Ongoing Story

As I write this article, the transition is still in progress.

Startups rarely publicize their pivots. Because of uncertainty, fear of being questioned, because there's no success yet to prove it.

But I feel this process itself is worth sharing.

When technology enables individuals to possess organizational capabilities, how will employment relationships evolve?

This is the question I am pondering, and the direction I am practicing.

If you are also thinking about these things:

  • If you didn't need to hire, what could you do?

  • If you didn't need to find a job, what would you want to do?

  • Can one person become a company?

This is an ongoing story.

I don't know how it will end either. But I know: Don't do things that go against the direction of the times.

15 years helping people find jobs. Next, helping people become companies.

Related reading: Interview with Bitlayer Co-founder Charlie: The Bull Market Ambition of Institutional-Grade Bitcoin Financial Infrastructure

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the author's initial motivation for starting COCO AI, and what did they learn from its first iteration?

AThe author's initial motivation was to use AI to make recruitment more efficient, helping more people find good jobs. From the first iteration (COCO 1.0), they learned that the market had fundamental challenges: companies' hiring demands were decreasing, there was a significant skills gap between job seekers and company requirements, and many job seekers' skills were outdated.

QWhat key external event in late 2025 fundamentally changed the author's perspective on the future of work?

AThe widespread application of Claude Code across various industries and the rise of 'digital employees' was the key external event. This was further solidified by the multi-billion dollar acquisition of Manus by Meta, proving the commercial success of the digital employee model.

QWhat was the pivotal internal experiment the author's team conducted, and what was its surprising result?

AThe team built an internal system called 'zylos' to handle daily work tasks like data reporting, social media management, and coding. The surprising result was that tasks which previously required multiple people from different roles could now be accomplished simply by assigning the task to the AI, demonstrating that one person could possess the capabilities of a small team.

QHow did the author's core belief about the value of recruitment shift after their 'cognitive update'?

AThe author's core belief shifted from the old认知 (cognition) that 'talent is a scarce resource, and helping companies find talent is valuable' to the new认知 that 'capability enhancement is more important than talent matching. Helping individuals acquire organizational-level capabilities holds greater value.'

QWhat is the new mission and product direction for COCO 2.0, as described by the author?

AThe new mission for COCO 2.0 is to help people not need to hire others and to help people create work instead of find it. The product direction is to build a 'Digital Co-Founder'—an AI partner that is self-learning, secure, controllable, and capable of performing complex tasks to empower individuals to become their own companies.

Пов'язані матеріали

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit37 хв тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit37 хв тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit49 хв тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit49 хв тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit52 хв тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit52 хв тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit57 хв тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit57 хв тому

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1 год тому

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити PEOPLE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Після придбання ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Легко торгуйте ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

490 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити PEOPLE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни PEOPLE (PEOPLE).

活动图片