Pump.fun (PUMP) Momentum Fades: Is Another Leg Down Imminent?

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-26

Анотація

Pump.fun (PUMP) has declined by over 5.63% in the past 24 hours, with its price dropping to around $0.00178. Despite a 16.98% increase in trading volume to $95.67 million, the market cap stands at $587.57 million, and liquidations have reached $403.30K. Technical indicators suggest a bearish trend: the MACD is below zero, indicating downward momentum, while the RSI at 41.03 shows a slight bearish bias. The Chaikin Money Flow is nearly neutral, and Bull-Bear Power suggests a lack of strong directional momentum. If bearish pressure continues, PUMP could test the $0.0016 support level. A bullish reversal would require breaking the $0.0018 resistance.

As of 26th March, Pump.fun (PUMP) is waving a red flag across the chart, registering a loss of over 5.63% in the last 24 hours. The asset opened the day trading at around $0.001922, and with the bearish pressure in the PUMP market, the price has retraced to a bottom range of $0.00177.

Currently, the Pump.fun price is trading at around the $0.001780 mark, with the market cap reaching $587.57 million. Besides, the daily trading volume is up by over 16.98%, touching $95.67 million. The Coinglass data has reported that the PUMP market has seen a 24-hour liquidation worth $403.30K.

With the negative sentiment of Pump.fun, the price might slip to test the $0.0016 level. Assuming a sturdy downside correction to happen, the death cross could emerge, and the bears would send the price even lower to its former supports.

If the bulls entered the PUMP market, the price could immediately rise to the resistance at around $0.0018. An extended pressure on the upside might initiate the golden cross to take place, and drive the asset’s price to its higher targets.

Which Direction Will PUMP’s Momentum Take Next?

Pump.fun’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and signal lines are below the zero line, which means the momentum is clearly in the downtrend. The price has been moving lower, and the market is heavy, so any bounce may struggle unless momentum starts to shift.

Besides, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator of PUMP at 0.01 is almost neutral, with a slight bullish tilt. Money is flowing into the asset, but it is very weak. Notably, the buyers are just starting to step in, and this points to a sideways market, unless stronger inflows begin to build.

The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) value of 41.03 indicates a slight bearish bias. Sellers have a small edge, and the price has been leaning lower, but the momentum is not strong. Also, there is still room to move either way, but for now, the Pump.fun market leans a bit weak.

Moreover, the Bull-Bear Power (BBP) reading of PUMP at -0.000095 is in the neutral phase. It has no dominance from either buyers or sellers, and the market is undecided, with very mild momentum. This points to sideways movement, unless a stronger push starts to build.

Top Updated Crypto News

MUBARAK Takes a Hit: Will the Sell-Off Continue?

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the current price of Pump.fun (PUMP) and how much has it lost in the last 24 hours?

AThe current price of Pump.fun (PUMP) is approximately $0.001780, and it has lost over 5.63% in the last 24 hours.

QWhat is the significance of the MACD and signal lines being below the zero line for PUMP?

AThe Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and signal lines being below the zero line indicates that the momentum for PUMP is clearly in a downtrend.

QAccording to the RSI, what is the current market bias for Pump.fun?

AThe daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) value of 41.03 indicates a slight bearish bias, meaning sellers have a small edge.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator suggest about money flow into the PUMP asset?

AThe Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator for PUMP is at 0.01, which is almost neutral with a very slight bullish tilt, indicating that money is flowing into the asset but very weakly.

QWhat is the next major support level that the Pump.fun price might test if the negative sentiment continues?

AIf the negative sentiment continues, the Pump.fun price might slip to test the $0.0016 support level.

Пов'язані матеріали

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

The meme coin competition is shifting from community hype to technological and ecosystem advantages. This analysis contrasts Bonk, an established token on the Solana network known for its speed and low costs, with the newer Little Pepe ($LILPEPE), currently in its presale phase. Bonk leverages its mature community and Solana's infrastructure, while Little Pepe differentiates itself with a Layer 2 Ethereum solution promising tax-free trading, staking rewards, and enhanced scalability. To drive engagement, Little Pepe is offering substantial giveaways totaling $777,000. Both coins, despite their different strategies—Bonk as a proven ecosystem and Little Pepe as an early-stage utility project—are capturing significant market attention as demand surges.

TheNewsCrypto49 хв тому

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

TheNewsCrypto49 хв тому

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

A US law enforcement task force has frozen over $700 million in cryptocurrency linked to investment scams targeting Americans. The operation, which involved cooperation from crypto exchanges and legal processes, also took down more than 500 fraudulent websites and a Telegram channel used to recruit victims. Two Chinese nationals were named in arrest warrants for operating a scam compound in Burma. In a related move, the US State Department announced a $10 million reward for information disrupting scam centers in Burma. Singaporean authorities, alongside major crypto exchanges and analytics firms, also prevented nearly $3 million in losses through a parallel operation. The scale of cybercrime remains vast, with the FBI reporting over $20 billion in losses in 2025.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

bitcoinist1 год тому

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that the Toncoin (TON) network will reduce transaction fees by six times in one week, lowering the cost to just 0.00039 TON (approximately $0.0005). This fee reduction is part of the "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) roadmap and will remain fixed regardless of network congestion. The update follows a recent upgrade that made the network 10 times faster and transactions nearly instant. Durov also hinted that future steps aim to make most transactions fully feeless. Although Telegram discontinued formal involvement with TON due to regulatory issues, Durov remains a strong supporter. Currently, Toncoin is trading around $1.30, down over 8% in the past week.

bitcoinist2 год тому

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

bitcoinist2 год тому

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 год тому

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 год тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 год тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни PUMP (PUMP).