Pump.fun-Linked Wallet Sends $148M Stablecoins to Kraken Again

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-13Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-13

Анотація

An on-chain analyst reported that a wallet linked to Pump.fun transferred approximately $148 million in USDC and USDT to Kraken, continuing a pattern of large transfers observed over the past two months. These funds originated from Pump.fun's mid-2025 token sale. Since November 15, a total of $753 million in stablecoins from the PUMP ICO proceeds has been moved to Kraken. Pump.fun has previously stated these are routine treasury operations for diversification and reinvestment, not liquidations. The latest transfer occurs amid increased scrutiny of the platform's fee structure and slowing revenue growth. Neither Pump.fun nor Kraken has publicly commented.

EmberCN, an on-chain analyst, revealed today that a wallet linked with Pump.fun has deposited around $148 million in stablecoins to Kraken. This transaction sees a continuing pattern of huge exchange-bound transfers seen in the last two months.

The data also reveals that the recent deposit included USDC and USDT shifted to Kraken in a short time span. It is noteworthy that the funds were initiated from wallets associated with the Pump.fun’s token sale occurred in mid-2025.

After this transfer, the total amount sent to Kraken since Nov. 15 is around $753 million in stablecoins. All the funds find their origin in proceeds from the PUMP initial coin offering, based on publicly visible wallet activity.

The same movements have been witnessed at regular intervals since late 2025, mostly consisting of nine-figure sums. Sometimes, stablecoins deposited to Kraken were then observed titting toward Circle-associated addresses, indicating probable redemptions or internal treasury operations.

No Public Comments Have Been Made

Both Pump.fun and Kraken have chosen not to comment publicly on the matter of the recent transfer. The pace and consistency of these deposits have captivated the attention of crypto markets, mainly Pump.fun’s crucial role in the memecoin economy of Solana.

Before this, Pump.fun has opposed claims that these transfers show cash-outs or liquidation activity. Team members have reported that past movements are routine treasury management, adding diversification, operational spending and preparation for reinvestment.

Still, the timing has ignited debate once again. The most recent transfer has come at a time of increased scrutiny of the platform, including complaints regarding its last creator fee structure and reduced revenue growth as contrasted to periods of peak memecoin trading.

The co-founder of the firm, Alon Cohen, accepted the flaws in the last fee model earlier this month. He gave out a new strategy that would move incentives away from volume-influenced token launches and toward traders and liquidity.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

UK Lawmakers Push to Ban Crypto Donations Over Transparency and Foreign Influence Risks

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the total amount of stablecoins transferred to Kraken by the Pump.fun-linked wallet since November 15th, and what was the source of these funds?

AThe total amount transferred to Kraken since November 15th is around $753 million in stablecoins. All the funds originated from proceeds from the PUMP initial coin offering, based on publicly visible wallet activity.

QAccording to the article, what reason has the Pump.fun team given for these large, regular transfers to Kraken?

AThe Pump.fun team has reported that these transfers are for routine treasury management, including diversification, operational spending, and preparation for reinvestment. They have opposed claims that the transfers show cash-outs or liquidation activity.

QWhat specific stablecoins were included in the recent $148 million deposit to Kraken, and how were they transferred?

AThe recent deposit included USDC and USDT, which were shifted to Kraken in a short time span.

QWhat recent change did Pump.fun's co-founder, Alon Cohen, announce regarding the platform's fee model?

AAlon Cohen acknowledged flaws in the previous fee model and announced a new strategy that would move incentives away from volume-influenced token launches and toward traders and liquidity.

QBeyond the transfers themselves, what does the article state sometimes happened to the stablecoins after they were deposited into Kraken?

ASometimes, after being deposited to Kraken, the stablecoins were then observed moving toward Circle-associated addresses, indicating probable redemptions or internal treasury operations.

Пов'язані матеріали

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit3 хв тому

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit3 хв тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 год тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 год тому

Analyst Reveals Accumulation Level For Dogecoin Before It Rallies To $2

A crypto analyst, Crypto Patel, predicts that Dogecoin (DOGE) could rally to $2, despite currently trading below $0.10. The analyst identifies a key accumulation zone between $0.07 and $0.09, where DOGE has repeatedly tested support without breaking down. Based on a bi-weekly chart using Elliott Wave theory, DOGE is in a Wave 4 consolidation phase within a descending channel. A bounce from this support is expected to trigger a Wave 5 rally, projecting a 2,767% surge toward $2. Price targets are set sequentially at $0.50, $1, and $2, with a stop-loss below $0.048. For a bullish trend reversal, DOGE must break above the $0.10 resistance level, which was recently rejected in April. Analysts emphasize that market conditions and a confirmed higher high are critical for the projected uptrend.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Analyst Reveals Accumulation Level For Dogecoin Before It Rallies To $2

bitcoinist1 год тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0418-0424)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0418-0424) provides in-depth analysis on key developments across macro trends, crypto markets, and policy. Key topics include the oil market nearing a physical supply crisis due to shipping disruptions, even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens. In crypto, reports cover global consumer crypto adoption, a data-driven strategy for trading volatile altcoins, and the state of VC funding. Prediction markets like Polymarket are analyzed not as pure event-guessing games but as systems where understanding legalistic rules creates an edge. Major DeFi protocol Aave is criticized for poor crisis management amid a $300M exploit, while the controversial structure of World Liberty Financial is examined. Other highlights include policy updates like the CLARITY Act, Ethereum’s, airdrop opportunities, and weekly recaps of major incidents like the Kelp DAO hack and SpaceX's AI disclosures.

marsbit1 год тому

Telegram Founder Claims French Officials Sold Crypto Data, Linked To 41 Kidnaps

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has accused French officials of selling crypto owners’ data to criminals, linking it to a sharp rise in kidnappings. France has seen 41 crypto-related kidnappings this year, part of a growing international trend known as “wrench attacks.” Durov criticized French policies requiring identity data and access to private messages, arguing that increased data flow leads to more leaks and victims. The incidents, which began in late 2024, have escalated significantly in 2026, now accounting for over half of all organized kidnappings tracked by French intelligence. In response, the government plans a broader crackdown, including a dedicated police unit, improved international coordination, and a new prevention platform for threat alerts and security guidance.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Telegram Founder Claims French Officials Sold Crypto Data, Linked To 41 Kidnaps

bitcoinist1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси