Pump.fun Expands With New Investment Arm, Pump Fund to Support Startups

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-20

Анотація

Pump.fun, a platform known for memecoins, has launched Pump Fund, a new investment arm to support early-stage startups. It also introduced a $3 million "Build in Public" Hackathon, offering 12 selected projects $250,000 each at a $10 million valuation, along with mentorship and ecosystem support. Unlike traditional hackathons, funding is determined by public traction rather than judges, requiring teams to launch tokens and develop openly with community interaction. Co-founder Alon Cohen stated that demand for strong founders remains high regardless of market conditions. Meanwhile, PUMP’s price saw a slight increase, though trading volume has declined, indicating cautious optimism about the platform’s strategic shift toward startup support.

Pump.fun, a memecoin, has announced the launch of Pump Fund, a new investment arm designed to support early-stage builders, marking a significant shift for the platform, which has been closely tied to the memecoin ecosystem.

On December 20, alongside the announcement, the platform introduced a $3 million “Build in Public” (BiP) Hackathon to boost startup projects constructed openly on its platform.

As its first initiative, the BiP Hackathon will back 12 selected projects with $250,000 each at a $10 million valuation, while offering long-term alignment, mentorship from Pump. fun’s founders, and ecosystem support to help startups scale transparently from day one.

Market-Led Hackathon Approach to Startup Funding

Unlike typical hackathons, funding decisions are directly tied to public traction. Where teams must introduce a token, retain at least 10% of its supply, and expand openly through community development, user interaction, and progress disclosure in real time, as per the announcement.

​The hackathon stands out for its market-led funding strategy, which substitutes a conventional judge. Where those projects are funded directly by users instead of submitting capital pitches to panels, now giving them a larger market the opportunity to decide which concepts receive support and funding.

​As per the X post, projects don’t have to be crypto-native and states that teams from all industries and phases of development are qualified as long as they ship products and maintain open channels of communication..

​The Pump. fun’s new idea represents that early user conviction can be a more effective filter than traditional gatekeeping, especially in fast-moving on-chain contexts, as reflected in this structure.

Alon Cohen Says Founders Are in High Demand

With that, Pump.fun co-founder Alon Cohen posted on X, “ The numerous on-chain metas we’ve seen since shows that the demand for good founders by traders and long-term allocators continues to be incredibly high, no matter the market conditions.”

Also, he added that Projects began introducing tokens early after noticing people were willing to invest in new ideas they believed could succeed, with millions of such participants potentially evolving into long-term users and investors.

PUMP Trading Volume Declines

While writing this article, the PUMP price surges 2.07% and is trading around $0.002578, which represents that after the news was revealed this morning, the price showed an uptick, as per CoinMarketCap data, while its 24-hour trading volume has been declining around 30%.

As per the data from Token Terminal, PUMP’s monthly trading volume hit an all-time high of $11.75 billion in January 2025. The trading volume has steadily declined, with the platform’s trading volumes in the month of December reaching $2.432 billion. With that, PUMP’s slight price gain amid falling trading volumes suggests measured optimism around Pump. fun’s shift from memecoins to a market-driven hackathon model for supporting startups.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Tether Teams Up With Bitqik for Digital Asset Education Program in Laos

TagsPUMPPump.fun

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main purpose of Pump.fun's newly launched Pump Fund?

AThe main purpose of Pump Fund is to support early-stage builders, marking a significant shift for the platform from its previous focus on the memecoin ecosystem.

QWhat is the 'Build in Public' (BiP) Hackathon and what does it offer to selected projects?

AThe 'Build in Public' Hackathon is a $3 million initiative that will back 12 selected projects with $250,000 each at a $10 million valuation. It also offers long-term alignment, mentorship from Pump.fun's founders, and ecosystem support to help startups scale transparently.

QHow does the funding strategy of Pump.fun's hackathon differ from a typical hackathon?

AUnlike typical hackathons where judges decide funding, this hackathon's funding decisions are directly tied to public traction. Projects are funded directly by users, giving the market the opportunity to decide which concepts receive support.

QAccording to co-founder Alon Cohen, what remains high regardless of market conditions?

AAlon Cohen stated that the demand for good founders by traders and long-term allocators continues to be incredibly high, no matter the market conditions.

QWhat does the data suggest about PUMP's price and trading volume following the announcement?

AThe data shows a slight price gain of 2.07% for PUMP, trading around $0.002578, while its 24-hour trading volume declined by approximately 30%. This suggests measured optimism around the platform's strategic shift.

Пов'язані матеріали

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

SpaceX announced its acquisition of AI programming startup Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion in an all-stock deal, just days after its record-breaking IPO. The move sent SpaceX's stock soaring, briefly making it the most valuable U.S. company. Cursor, founded in 2022 by MIT graduate Michael Truell and his classmates, is a popular AI coding assistant that allows developers to switch between models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others. It saw explosive revenue growth, reaching a $4 billion annualized run rate in early 2026. However, its market share was eroded by the launch of competitor Claude Code from its key AI supplier, Anthropic. This dependence prompted Cursor to develop its own AI model, Composer, in early 2026. To scale Composer, Cursor needed immense computing power. In April 2026, it struck a deal with SpaceX, granting the latter an option to acquire it post-IPO. SpaceX exercised this option, offering Cursor access to its Colossus supercomputer, powered by hundreds of thousands of top-tier Nvidia AI chips. For SpaceX, the acquisition is a strategic move to bolster its AI capabilities, particularly for its xAI division, and advance its broader ambition of building orbital, solar-powered data centers. While the deal surprised some employees and investors given Truell's earlier stance on independence, it represents a high-stakes partnership. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has projected the company could reach $1 trillion in revenue by 2030. For Truell, joining forces with SpaceX is a monumental gamble on an unprecedented scale in the race for AI dominance.

链捕手2 хв тому

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

链捕手2 хв тому

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

Summary: The article raises concerns about the systemic risks posed by SpaceX's skyrocketing valuation, arguing that modern market mechanics, rather than fundamentals, are driving its price discovery. Following SpaceX's market capitalization surpassing $3 trillion in after-hours trading, the author contends that the market is no longer functioning properly. The core issue is not SpaceX's business prospects but the unhealthy market structure surrounding it. With limited float and the imminent launch of options trading, the stage is set for a potential "gamma squeeze"—a feedback loop where market makers hedging call options are forced to buy shares, pushing the price higher and attracting more speculative momentum traders. This mechanism, seen previously with Tesla and meme stocks, can decouple valuation from financial reality. The danger escalates as extreme valuations force passive funds, ETFs, pensions, and major indices to hold the stock. If SpaceX grows large enough—hypothetically reaching $5 or even $10 trillion—its performance would increasingly dictate broader market indices, embedding systemic risk. The author warns that when price appreciation itself becomes the primary bullish thesis, the market transforms from a capital allocation mechanism into a self-reinforcing speculative machine, endangering the retirement savings of ordinary investors tied to passive strategies. The piece questions whether such a system can still perform its fundamental role of price discovery.

marsbit7 хв тому

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

marsbit7 хв тому

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

How much of your $20 Claude Pro subscription actually goes to AI model companies like Anthropic? A viral breakdown image highlights the fundamental valuation challenge for AI applications versus traditional SaaS. Unlike SaaS with high software margins, AI subscriptions face variable "inference costs": every user query consumes GPU time, power, and cloud resources. This creates a tension between fixed subscription fees and usage-driven expenses. While the specific dollar splits are illustrative, the core question is whether AI revenue can achieve SaaS-like margins as usage scales. Currently, infrastructure providers (cloud platforms, GPU makers like Nvidia, HBM suppliers, power/data centers) capture more certain revenue from growing AI usage. Their financials reflect pricing power and faster earnings validation. The bullish case hinges on efficiency improvements: model optimization, caching, smaller models, and custom chips could lower per-token costs over time. The key debate is whether cost declines can outpace increases in user workload complexity and volume. Ultimately, for AI companies to command high SaaS-like valuations, they must demonstrate not just user growth but also improving gross margins after accounting for inference costs. Investors will scrutinize not just subscriber numbers, but usage patterns, enterprise pricing tiers, and real efficiency gains.

marsbit17 хв тому

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

marsbit17 хв тому

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

The article discusses the rise and fall of Pre-IPO pricing markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market for SpaceX (SPCX) by launching a contract with a clear anchor: the eventual Nasdaq listing price. This provided inherent price stability and validation. In contrast, Ventuals, a team backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding exclusive contracts for highly sought-after companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Its key mistake was its pricing mechanism. For companies with no near-term IPO date, Ventuals' oracle relied partly on opaque private market transactions and, critically, partly on its own contract's moving average price. This created a self-referential feedback loop where prices were artificially propped up and detached from genuine supply and demand, leading to illiquid markets. Ventuals shut down after nine months, settling positions at final prices of $1,341.80 for OpenAI and $1,618.90 for Anthropic. Ironically, some employees and late-stage investors of these very companies reportedly used these flawed Ventuals prices for valuation reference, highlighting the acute demand for any price signal in illiquid private markets. The article concludes that while demand for pre-IPO trading is real and growing, with players like Coinbase now entering the space, the fundamental challenge remains: without a public listing to provide a definitive price anchor, these markets struggle to establish truly accurate and liquid pricing. The need for a transparent, self-correcting market is the critical lesson from Ventuals' failure.

marsbit33 хв тому

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

marsbit33 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити PUMP

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Big Pump (PUMP) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Big Pump (PUMP).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Big Pump (PUMP)Після придбання Big Pump (PUMP) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Big Pump (PUMP)Легко торгуйте Big Pump (PUMP) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

321 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити PUMP

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни PUMP (PUMP).

活动图片