Profit Drops for LIT Whale After Closing Long Position

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-05

Анотація

A whale wallet recently closed a long position on LIT, incurring a loss of $767,403. This caused its overall profit to drop significantly from $3 million to $420k. The closure occurred despite LIT's recent price increase, currently trading at $2.72 with a 6.73% surge in the last 24 hours. Although LIT reached an all-time high of $4.04 on December 30, 2025, it has since declined by 32.63%. Forecasts for early 2026 predict a price correction, with LIT dropping to around $2.17 in the next month before rebounding to $2.21 in three months. Despite short-term bearish predictions, long-term sentiment remains bullish, with expectations for LIT to reach $5.31 by the end of 2026.

A whale wallet recently closed their long position on LIT, but faced significant loss in the process. Overall profit has dropped as well. The development notably comes at a time when Lighter tokens are marking upticks in their values and recorded an ATH a few days ago.

Whale Faces Loss Closing LIT Position

A whale wallet reportedly recorded a loss of $767,403 after closing the long position on LIT. Acquired at a 1x leverage, the 1.6-year dormant wallet has also recorded a drop in profit from $3 million to $420k.

The development within a week from increasing the long position in the token. The position was valued at around $3.59 million with a floating loss of more than $1.26 million. Simultaneously, the whale wallet was able to close a short position in ASTER with a profit of $537k before that transaction.

LIT Price Rally

Anticipations around LIT price rally gained momentum when another whale wallet deposited USDC to expand LIT holdings. Lighter tokens were trading at $2.69 at that time, but are now up to $2.72 with a surge of 6.73% over the last 24 hours. It further represents a jump of 2.3% in the last 7 days.

LIT recorded an ATL of $2.30 on December 30, 2025, and is now up by 18.47% from that value. It noted an ATH of $4.04 on the same date, but has now declined by 32.63%. Interestingly, LIT has 1 billion in total supply but has only 250 million in circulation.

LIT in 2026

The early 3 months of 2026 are forecasted to see a price correction for LIT. The token could go as low as $2.17 in the next 1 month and rebound to $2.21 as it completes the 3-month cycle from this point. The 1 month decline comes to around 20.89% from the current value. Similarly, the 3-month plunge comes to approximately 19.45%.

Its support and resistance margins are yet to be defined, but overall sentiments remain bullish with the neutral 14-Day RSI of 38 points and the FGI of 26 points. The trajectory drawn to this point, based on market conditions, expects LIT to start reclaiming its highs from September 2026. A walk on the chart could pave the way to $5.31 by the end of 2026.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Japan Finance Minister Backs Integration of Digital Assets Into TradFi

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the amount of loss the whale faced after closing their long position on LIT?

AThe whale faced a loss of $767,403 after closing their long position on LIT.

QHow much did the whale's overall profit drop after closing the LIT position?

AThe whale's overall profit dropped from $3 million to $420,000.

QWhat was the All-Time High (ATH) price of LIT and how much has it declined from that value?

AThe All-Time High (ATH) price of LIT was $4.04, and it has now declined by 32.63% from that value.

QWhat is the forecasted price range for LIT over the next 3 months according to the article?

AThe article forecasts that LIT could drop to as low as $2.17 in the next month and rebound to $2.21 by the 3-month mark.

QWhat is the long-term price target for LIT by the end of 2026, as mentioned in the article?

AThe long-term price target for LIT by the end of 2026 is $5.31.

Пов'язані матеріали

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit12 хв тому

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit12 хв тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn15 хв тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn15 хв тому

Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

The Blockchain Association, along with 160 former national security and law enforcement officials, has urged Senate leaders to pass the CLARITY Act. They argue that without clear federal regulation, crypto activity will move to opaque offshore markets, hindering U.S. efforts to combat financial crime. The letter highlights that the Act would strengthen law enforcement by expanding anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act, improving information sharing between agencies like the Treasury, DOJ, and FBI, and enhancing oversight of digital asset kiosks with measures like transaction monitoring and fraud prevention. The Association emphasizes these are enforcement enhancements, not deregulation. Momentum for the bill is building, with a Senate vote expected this summer, though it would still need reconciliation with a previously passed House version.

bitcoinist22 хв тому

Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

bitcoinist22 хв тому

Blocked Its Own Treasure, WeChat AI Steps Up

Tencent's stock surged over 10% on June 2nd amid reports that WeChat, with 1.43 billion monthly users, is finalizing tests for a native AI Agent. The reported feature, accessible by swiping right from the main interface, allows users to issue commands in natural language. The AI then decomposes tasks and automatically calls upon relevant Mini Programs within WeChat to complete actions like ordering food, booking tickets, or making payments, creating a closed-loop service execution system. This strategic shift follows the internal conflict and subsequent "blocking" of Tencent's standalone AI app, Yuanbao, by WeChat for violating sharing rules during a 2026 Spring Festival promotion. The incident highlighted a lack of internal consensus and exposed the weakness of competing in the standalone AI assistant arena against rivals like ByteDance's Doubao (345M MAU) and Alibaba's Qianwen. The new WeChat AI Agent aims to leverage WeChat's unique assets—its massive user base, standardized Mini Program APIs, WeChat Pay, and identity system—to move from simple content generation to actual task execution. Analysts note this changes the competitive landscape from model benchmarks to which AI can connect to more real-world services. However, success depends on key variables: the capability of Tencent's underlying Hunyuan model, managing massive inference costs, and redesigning incentives for Mini Program developers whose traffic might be bypassed. The move is seen as an attempt to keep user service intent within WeChat's ecosystem as AI begins to redefine how users access services.

marsbit1 год тому

Blocked Its Own Treasure, WeChat AI Steps Up

marsbit1 год тому

ByteDance Adopts Arm CPUs, Jensen Huang: So Sad I Didn't Buy Arm

**Summary:** At Computex 2026, Arm CEO Rene Haas announced that ByteDance and Oracle have adopted Arm's self-designed Arm AGI data center CPU. The company expects significant revenue growth from this product, projecting $20 billion in demand for the 2027/2028 fiscal years. Haas noted that restricting AI-capable CPUs from the US to China is nearly impossible due to their widespread applications. Arm's stock has surged dramatically this year, notably rising 16% after NVIDIA's Arm-based Vera CPU and RTX Spark announcements. A highlight was the informal, humorous on-stage conversation between Haas and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang. Huang joked about NVIDIA's failed attempt to acquire Arm and playfully lamented selling his Arm shares. Both executives showed a clear sense of camaraderie and shared regret over the missed merger. Key technical topics were discussed: 1. **AI PC Design:** Huang explained NVIDIA's RTX Spark superchip (with a 20-core Arm CPU) is designed for future AI agents that will autonomously run and use tools on PCs, blending local and cloud processing. 2. **Agent vs. OS:** Huang emphasized the operating system remains crucial, as AI agents rely on its APIs and tools to function. 3. **Growth Constraints:** He identified the shift to "useful AI" that generates profitable tokens as a primary driver for immense, almost limitless, computational demand. Haas outlined Arm's strategy across PC and data centers. For PCs, Arm collaborates with partners like NVIDIA and MediaTek, offering its compute subsystem (CSS) for custom SoCs. In data centers, its Arm AGI CPU (built on TSMC's 3nm process) has gained major partners including OpenAI, Meta, and now ByteDance and Oracle. Arm presented a multi-year roadmap for its in-house CPU line. The article concludes that while GPUs dominated the AI training race, the explosion of AI agents is shifting significant focus to CPUs for inference, state management, and tool orchestration. The industry is trending towards vertical integration, with companies like cloud providers designing chips and chip/IP firms offering full solutions, all competing to deliver more efficient computing per watt.

marsbit1 год тому

ByteDance Adopts Arm CPUs, Jensen Huang: So Sad I Didn't Buy Arm

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси