Prediction Market Competition Heats Up, Hyperliquid Enters the Fray with 'Outcomes'

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-02-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-03

Анотація

Hyperliquid, a leading crypto derivatives exchange, has announced the test launch of "Outcomes," a new prediction market feature, causing its native token HYPE to surge over 10%. Unlike traditional prediction markets, Outcomes is designed with three core mechanisms: full collateralization (eliminating liquidation risk), non-linear settlement (enabling complex strategies similar to options), and native integration with Hyperliquid’s chain and margin system. This move positions Hyperliquid against established players like Polymarket (focused on social sentiment), Kalshi (compliant markets), and Coinbase (consumer-facing products). Hyperliquid aims to integrate prediction markets directly into its financial ecosystem, allowing users to combine derivatives and prediction positions within a unified margin account. With a highly efficient core team of 11 members generating over $1 billion in annualized revenue per person, Hyperliquid is expanding rapidly. While some analysts note that even capturing all of Polymarket’s volume would only add ~5% to Hyperliquid’s revenue, the platform’s current $7 billion valuation is considered undervalued compared to Polymarket’s $10 billion valuation. Outcomes is seen as a key step in building a comprehensive on-chain Wall Street, though it remains in testnet with no mainnet release date announced.

Original Author: Seed.eth, Bitpush News

Hyperliquid, firmly holding the top spot in the crypto derivatives track, is now attempting to extend its reach into another trillion-dollar market on the brink of explosion: the prediction market.

Today, Hyperliquid officially announced the testing of a new feature called 'Outcomes'. This news directly ignited excitement in the secondary market, with its native token HYPE recording a gain of over 10% within 24 hours, breaking through the $30 mark.

At a time when Polymarket dominates on-chain traffic and Kalshi, in partnership with Coinbase, captures the compliant market, Hyperliquid's entry is far from simple 'bandwagoning'. Instead, it leverages the absolute advantage of its native underlying performance to redefine the rules of the game.

What is Outcomes

According to the official HIP-4 proposal, Outcomes (Result Contracts) are not a simple betting interface. Their design hinges on the following three core logics:

1. Full Collateralization, No Liquidation Risk

Unlike leveraged perpetual contracts, Outcomes adhere to the principle of 'you can only do as much as your money allows'. It uses full collateralization and settles within a fixed range. This means that no matter how the market fluctuates, as long as the settlement date hasn't arrived, a trader's position will not face forced liquidation, fundamentally removing the risk of being liquidated.

2. Non-linear Settlement, Greater Strategic Space

Outcomes introduces a non-linear settlement mechanism. For traders, this is equivalent to gaining a flexibility close to that of options. You can use it to build more complex hedging instruments, no longer limited to simple binary 'yes' or 'no' games, thereby opening up greater space for risk management and strategic combinations.

3. Native Integration, Liquidity Connectivity

Outcomes will be deeply integrated into HyperCore, Hyperliquid's underlying chain, and priced in its native stablecoin USDH. More importantly, it will share cross-margin with the platform's existing spot and perpetual contracts. This means users can seamlessly connect multiple trading strategies within a single margin account, truly achieving interoperability and reuse of liquidity.

Multi-Party Fragmentation: Who is the Final Form of the Prediction Market?

The current prediction market is at its '1995 browser war' moment, forming four distinct business paths:

  • Polymarket sells 'opinions'; it's a barometer of social trends.
  • Kalshi sells 'compliance'; it attracts US domestic capital seeking to avoid legal risks.
  • Coinbase is about 'dimensionality reduction attack', turning the prediction market into a mass consumer product through an in-app feature.
  • Hyperliquid's logic is the most hardcore: it doesn't require you to click Yes or No on a webpage; it wants you to buy an Outcomes contract hedging 'non-farm payroll data exceeding expectations' while shorting BTC.

Right now, the community is most focused on the synergistic effect between HIP-3 (Permissionless Listing) and HIP-4 (Outcomes).

Under this architecture, Hyperliquid's evolution path is clear: first, official deployment of 'Canonical Markets' based on objective data sources, such as interest rates and macroeconomic indicators; followed by enabling permissionless deployment.

Behind this strategy is Hyperliquid's legendary team advantage. It's hard to imagine that this behemoth, with annualized revenue exceeding $1.1 billion and trading volume rivaling top-tier CEXs, is supported by a core team of only about 11 people. This 'special forces' team, composed of Harvard, MIT elites, and top quantitative hedge fund professionals, has created an astonishing efficiency of over $100 million in annualized revenue per capita. Precisely because the team is extremely lean with short decision-making paths, Hyperliquid can iterate rapidly.

A senior DeFi observer commented: 'Coinbase's entry validates the business model, but it is still centralized. Hyperliquid's Outcomes is challenging a proposition: the endgame of prediction markets does not lie in social media, but in financialization. When trading prediction outcomes becomes as smooth as buying and selling stocks, and can share margin with futures, the imagination space for on-chain finance truly opens up.'

Is HYPE Severely Undervalued?

As the crypto options market matures, the Open Interest (OI) in Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market has surged to $1 billion, and the platform's 24-hour trading volume has skyrocketed to $4.8 billion, hitting a new all-time high.

Regarding this move, Blockworks researcher Shaunda Devens believes it further supports Hyperliquid's valuation upside.

Devens pointed out that even if HIP-4 captured 100% of Polymarket's trading volume, its contribution to Hyperliquid's revenue would only be about 5%.

This data seems surprising at first glance, but the underlying logic is: the perpetual contracts market (including the long-tail assets brought by HIP-3) is extremely large. Devens believes that Hyperliquid's current valuation of approximately $7 billion is clearly in a state of significant undervaluation compared to Polymarket's latest round valuation of $10 billion (based on 2025 funding data). The launch of Outcomes is primarily about supplementing a key piece of its full-category financial matrix.

Despite the high market sentiment, it is important to note that Outcomes is currently still in the testnet phase, and a specific timeline for the mainnet launch has not been announced yet. However, with the explosion of the HyperEVM ecosystem, future mainstream service providers like Kalshi or Crypto.com could, in theory, migrate to run on the Hyperliquid chain using the HIP-4 protocol.

In summary, the prediction market is ushering in its best era. In the US, thanks to the advancement of regulatory clarity, the cooperation between Kalshi and Coinbase has already made prediction markets available in all 50 states; similarly strong growth momentum is also seen in the EU and Asia. For Hyperliquid, Outcomes is not a simple 'gambling game'; it is an indispensable piece of the puzzle in building the 'on-chain Wall Street'.

Original link

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is Hyperliquid's new feature called and what market is it targeting?

AHyperliquid's new feature is called 'Outcomes', and it is targeting the prediction market.

QWhat are the three core design principles of Hyperliquid's Outcomes feature?

AThe three core design principles are: 1. Full collateralization with no liquidation risk. 2. Non-linear settlement for greater strategic flexibility. 3. Native integration on HyperCore, sharing cross-margin with existing spot and perpetual contracts.

QHow did the announcement of Outcomes affect the price of the HYPE token?

AThe announcement caused the HYPE token to surge over 10% in 24 hours, pushing its price above $30.

QAccording to the article, how does Hyperliquid's approach to the prediction market differ from competitors like Polymarket and Kalshi?

AHyperliquid's approach is not a simple gambling interface; it leverages its native chain's performance to create a financialized product that integrates seamlessly with other derivatives, allowing for complex hedging strategies. This contrasts with Polymarket, which focuses on social sentiment, and Kalshi, which focuses on regulatory compliance.

QWhat was a key observation from Blockworks researcher Shaunda Devens regarding Hyperliquid's valuation after the Outcomes announcement?

AShaunda Devens observed that Hyperliquid's ~$7 billion valuation is significantly undervalued compared to Polymarket's latest $10 billion valuation, even if Outcomes captured 100% of Polymarket's volume, as the perpetuals market is vastly larger and is Hyperliquid's primary revenue driver.

Пов'язані матеріали

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit35 хв тому

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit35 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit42 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit42 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手44 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手44 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手1 год тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片