Polygon vs. Ethereum: Why ‘micro’ AI agents are winning fee war on POL

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-17

Анотація

Polygon has surpassed Ethereum in daily transaction fees, a significant milestone, with its daily fees exceeding $300,000. This surge reflects a notable increase in network activity, as daily transactions on Polygon also rose by approximately 50% over the past week. A key driver behind this growth is the rise of payment-focused AI agents, which have boosted micro-transaction volumes. Additionally, the adoption of more crypto card products and payment apps has contributed to increased activity in small and medium transfer categories. Data indicates that monthly payment transfers on Polygon nearly doubled to 2 million in January and could reach around 2.3 million in February if the current pace continues. The increased network usage is also positively impacting POL's price, which climbed roughly 15% in the past week, moving from around $0.09 to briefly test above $0.11 before settling near $0.107. While the token remains in a steady upward trend, some indicators suggest the rally may be slowing, though continued network growth could support further price stability and potential upside. Overall, Polygon's flipping of Ethereum in daily fees and its rising transaction volume signal strong momentum for the network.

Polygon has pulled ahead of Ethereum in daily transaction fees, and that doesn’t happen very often. If this pace continues, February could turn out to be a surprisingly strong month for Polygon!

Activity is picking up!

Polygon has pulled off a big win, overtaking Ethereum [ETH] in daily transaction fees! Recent data showed Polygon’s [POL] fees crossing $300K, a jump that proves rising network usage.

Source: X

This pace wasn’t limited to fees either.

Source: X

Daily transactions on Polygon have climbed over the past week, rising about 50% in just seven days.

Payments play a big role

Data per Dune showed that monthly payment transfers on the network were close to 2 million in January, nearly doubling from under 1 million just two months earlier.

Source: X

A major cause seems to be the rise of payment-focused AI agents, which boosted smaller “micro” transactions. At the same time, more crypto card products and payment apps helped increase activity in the small and medium transfer categories.

At the current pace, February could see transfers reach around 2.3 million.

POL price holds gains

All this growth is showing up in the price charts too!

Over the past week, the token climbed roughly 15%, pushing from the $0.09 range to briefly test above $0.11. This was before it settled near $0.107 at press time.

Source: TradingView

POL moved within a steady upward range, which means buyers were still in control.

However, the rally may be slowing. The RSI was in a healthy zone, while the MACD showed lesser bullish strength after the recent push higher.

The trend is still positive, but the market may be taking a moment after a quick run-up. If network growth continues at the current pace, price stability above this range could cause further upside.

Final Summary

Polygon flipping Ethereum in daily fees above $300K is big news for the former.
If transactions keep rising, POL price momentum could see stronger upside!

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat recent achievement did Polygon accomplish in comparison to Ethereum?

APolygon overtook Ethereum in daily transaction fees, with its fees crossing $300K.

QBy what percentage did daily transactions on Polygon increase over the past week?

ADaily transactions on Polygon rose by about 50% in just seven days.

QWhat was a major factor contributing to the rise in small and medium transfers on Polygon?

AThe rise of payment-focused AI agents and more crypto card products and payment apps helped boost smaller 'micro' transactions.

QHow much did the POL token climb in price over the past week?

AThe POL token climbed roughly 15%, moving from the $0.09 range to briefly test above $0.11.

QWhat does the projected transfer volume for February indicate based on current trends?

AAt the current pace, February could see transfers reach around 2.3 million.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit9 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit9 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手9 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手9 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit11 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit11 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手12 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手12 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit13 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit13 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни POL (POL).

Polygon vs. Ethereum: Why ‘micro’ AI agents are winning fee war on POL

Анотація

Activity is picking up!

Payments play a big role

POL price holds gains

Final Summary

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

Торгівля

Популярні статті

Як купити POL

Обговорення