PIPPIN down 13%: Smart money selling, long squeeze, and…

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-25Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-25

Анотація

PIPPIN's price crashed over 13% in 24 hours, extending monthly losses to 36%, significantly underperforming the broader crypto market. On-chain data indicates smart money offloaded over $675K of PIPPIN, contributing to heavy sell pressure. The price broke below an ascending trendline, entering a bearish structure and trading choppily between $0.28 and $0.50. A long squeeze accelerated the decline, while traders are now clustering liquidity bets around the $0.39-$0.42 zone, a potential target for a bounce. However, continued selling pressure and market-wide capital rotation from memecoins to stable assets like BTC and ETH suggest ongoing risks. A breakdown below key support at $0.29 could trigger further declines.

PIPPIN price crashed by more than 13% in the past 24 hours, extending the losses to about 36% this month. The memecoin underperformed the crypto market, which was nearly flat over the past few weeks.

Technically, the memecoin is undergoing a deeper correction, which is evident on the charts and in the chain activity.

Smart money offloading PIPPIN

As per StalkChain data, PIPPIN was the most sold token in the last 24 hours. The smart money offloaded more than $675K Pippin [PIPPIN] during this period.

This withdrawal of capital from the memecoin resulted in the sell pressure that brought the memecoin down.

Other memes in this category were Fartcoin [FARTCOIN], WHITEWHALE, and PENGUIN. Inclusion of USDC in this list meant that traders were locking in profits or cutting their losses.

Again, the correction was market-wide, specifically for memecoins. This is because traders were moving from the high-risk tokens like memes to more stable assets like Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH].

PIPPIN price remains choppy

While the smart money is bearish with their actions, the PIPPIN price has been choppy since reaching a peak around $0.70. The memecoin had broken below the ascending trendline, which indicated the price was trading in a bearish structure.

Even the small pumps that were happening between mid-December and now were insignificant, as the price could not break past this consolidation.

The Choppiness Index (CHOP), which was at 49, showed that the PIPPIN price was bouncing between $0.28 and $0.50. This is after peaking around 60, which meant that the price had no clear direction yet.

Furthermore, the seller’s momentum was contributing to this decline in the price of PIPPIN. The red bars were gradually increasing in size as the price approached the support level around $0.29.

Historical data showed that every time the PIPPIN price hit the aforementioned support level, it was followed by a bounce back. That suggested it could rise to $0.40 as the first target.

Conversely, a breakdown of the level would accelerate the decline, increasing the losses. However, this was not guaranteed, as bets to the upside were hitting the markets.

Liquidity magnet sitting above price action

As per CoinGlass data, traders were now betting on price, activating the orders at the $0.39 level. Positions worth thousands of dollars were clustered between $0.39 and $0.42, price magnets that could pull PIPPIN toward this zone.

The clusters came after the liquidation of long orders sitting below $0.36. The long squeeze accelerated the breakdown on the charts.

That said, choppiness on the charts, smart money’s selling pressure, capital rotation, and a long squeeze all contributed to the price crash.


Final Thoughts

  • PIPPIN price declined by 13%, extending the monthly losses to 36%.
  • PIPPIN could bounce back to $0.39, where liquidity clusters were price magnets.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the percentage decline in PIPPIN's price over the past 24 hours and this month?

APIPPIN's price crashed by more than 13% in the past 24 hours, extending the losses to about 36% this month.

QAccording to StalkChain data, what was the primary action of 'smart money' regarding PIPPIN in the last 24 hours?

AAccording to StalkChain data, PIPPIN was the most sold token in the last 24 hours, with smart money offloading more than $675K worth of it.

QWhat does the Choppiness Index (CHOP) value of 49 indicate about the PIPPIN price action?

AA Choppiness Index (CHOP) value of 49 shows that the PIPPIN price was bouncing between $0.28 and $0.50 with no clear directional trend.

QWhat is the significance of the liquidity clusters between $0.39 and $0.42 for the PIPPIN price?

AThe liquidity clusters between $0.39 and $0.42 are price magnets that could potentially pull the PIPPIN price toward that zone, as traders have placed orders there.

QWhat are the two possible price scenarios mentioned for PIPPIN if it reaches the key support level around $0.29?

AHistorically, the price has bounced back from the $0.29 support level, potentially rising to $0.40. Conversely, a breakdown below this level would accelerate the decline and increase losses.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

The article explores why the U.S. lacks large-scale consumer credit products like China's "Huabei" and "Jiebei," despite having a developed financial sector. Key reasons include: 1. **Structural Barriers**: A fragmented federal and state regulatory system, reinforced by post-2008 reforms like the Dodd-Frank Act, raises compliance costs and protects traditional banks, stifling fintech innovation. 2. **Credit Card Dominance**: Credit cards, used by 70-80% of adults, form a $1.28 trillion debt market with high APRs (avg. 22.3%). This system cross-subsidizes users who pay in full with those carrying balances, creating a predatory yet entrenched ecosystem. 3. **Data Privacy Laws**: Strict regulations (e.g., FCRA, CCPA) prevent tech giants from leveraging behavioral data for credit scoring, unlike in China where such data fuels fintech models. 4. **Capital Market Disincentives**: Wall Street penalizes tech firms entering finance due to lower valuations associated with heavy regulation and risk, as seen in Apple’s failure with Apple Card. 5. **Banking Oligopoly**: Major banks control consumer lending, leveraging lobbying power and consumer habits to maintain high-cost credit, while alternatives like payday loans (400% APR) or "unbanked" services remain niche or exploitative. Ultimately, regulatory, structural, and corporate interests collectively block the emergence of accessible, low-cost digital lending in the U.S.

Odaily星球日报21 хв тому

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

Odaily星球日报21 хв тому

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

Chinese tech giants like ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent are accelerating the rollout of integrated AI model subscription services—dubbed “model supermarkets”—to provide developers with bundled access to multiple leading domestic large language models (LLMs). ByteDance’s Volcengine recently upgraded its "Coding Plan" by adding newer models like GLM-5.1, Minimax M2.7, and Kimi k2.6, allowing subscribers to use various top models under a single monthly fee starting at ¥40. However, user feedback reveals significant issues, including rapid consumption of usage limits (e.g., hitting caps within hours), frequent server errors (like HTTP 429), and slow response times during peak hours. Complaints about misleading deduction rates—where calls to advanced models consume more quota—are also common. The trend is industry-wide: Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have all launched similar multi-model coding plans. While these platforms reduce trial costs for developers, they also expose challenges in balancing affordability with service quality and computational stability. Amid this shift, independent AI companies like Zhipu, MiniMax, and Moonlight Face (Kimi) are developing strategies to avoid becoming mere “pipes” in this ecosystem—focusing on vertical applications, autonomous agents, and long-context models to retain competitiveness. Analysts suggest that, while platform aggregation may pressure model firms in the short term, specialized and vertical AI capabilities will remain differentiated in the long run.

marsbit25 хв тому

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

marsbit25 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片