Pi Network nears crucial price point: Breakout or bull trap for PI?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-06

Анотація

Pi Network's PI token has shown strong performance, gaining 16.1% over the past week and 5% in the last 24 hours, contrasting Bitcoin's decline. However, the longer-term trend remains bearish. The price has reached a key psychological resistance at $0.20, which may be a bull trap rather than a sustainable breakout. Technical indicators like the OBV and Awesome Oscillator show buying pressure, but the CMF suggests underlying weakness. The daily chart structure is still bearish, and a break above $0.216 is needed to shift the trend bullishly. Traders are advised to watch for a close below $0.1857 to confirm bearish momentum. The breakout from the triangle pattern may be a retracement before further declines.

Pi Network [PI] has been a strong performer over the past week. According to CoinMarketCap data, it was up by 16.1% over the past week and witnessed a 5% rally over the past 24 hours.

This was encouraging news, especially when contrasted against Bitcoin’s [BTC] 1.4% plunge over the previous day.

This relative strength might give PI bulls the confidence to go long. Yet, as AMBCrypto reported earlier in the week, the altcoin’s longer-term trend might not favor the buyers in the coming days and weeks.

Are PI prices in a value area for traders?

On the daily chart, the price was back at the psychological $0.20 supply zone. The gains it has made over the past three weeks were a heartening sight to speculators, but it could be a trap.

The long-term trend remained bearish. The current rally was likely part of a retracement before the bearish move can continue. In the lower timeframes, a triangle pattern was spotted recently, which led to a strong breakout.

This breakout has reached the 78.6% retracement level at $0.197. The OBV has made higher highs during the rally, and the Awesome Oscillator was back above the zero line. Together, they indicated buying pressure and positive momentum.

On the other hand, the CMF has remained below -0.05 for most of the retracement. This was a contradictory sign, but it agreed with the longer-term price action- bulls were likely too weak to reverse the downtrend.

Traders, is it time to sell PI?

It was nearly time to sell PI. The H4 trend was bullish, exemplified by the break of the lower high at $0.1788 (cyan). The most recent higher low was at $0.1857 (green), while a local resistance level at $0.2055 (white) opposed further bullish expansion.

On this timeframe chart, the technical indicators were all bullish. Yet, the higher timeframe trends must be respected.

Traders can wait for an H4 session close below $0.1857 to confirm the bearish bias. Meanwhile, a rally beyond $0.216 is needed to shift the 1-day structure bullishly.


Final Summary

  • The Pi Network bullish breakout from the triangle pattern should not lull buyers into a false sense of security.
  • The longer-term swing structure remained bearish, and $0.216 must be breached to shift this swing structure in favor of the bulls.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the current price performance of Pi Network (PI) according to Bitcoin's recent movement?

APi Network was up by 16.1% over the past week and witnessed a 5% rally over the past 24 hours, while Bitcoin plunged 1.4% over the previous day.

QWhat key psychological supply zone is PI's price currently testing on the daily chart?

API's price is back at the psychological $0.20 supply zone.

QWhat contradictory signal does the CMF (Chaikin Money Flow) indicator show despite the recent rally?

AThe CMF has remained below -0.05 for most of the retracement, indicating potential weakness in buying pressure despite the rally.

QWhat price level needs to be breached to shift the 1-day structure to bullish according to the analysis?

AA rally beyond $0.216 is needed to shift the 1-day structure bullishly.

QWhat should traders wait for to confirm a bearish bias on the H4 timeframe?

ATraders can wait for an H4 session close below $0.1857 to confirm the bearish bias.

Пов'язані матеріали

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit14 год тому

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit14 год тому

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit15 год тому

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit15 год тому

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit16 год тому

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit16 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片