Pi Network Introduces PiRC1 Token Framework for Mainnet Ecosystem

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-23

Анотація

Pi Network has introduced the PiRC1 token framework, a new utility-oriented standard for creating and managing tokens within its Mainnet ecosystem. This framework provides structured guidelines for token issuance, distribution, and emission logic, aiming to support real-world applications and services. A key feature is that funds from token launches will be directed to liquidity pools rather than project teams, enhancing trade stability. The proposal is open for community feedback on GitHub, reflecting Pi Network’s focus on community-driven governance. The move is expected to attract more developers and provide competitive advantages by offering clear operational parameters. This development coincides with significant Mainnet growth, including millions of users completing identity verification.

The Pi Network has rolled out a new utility-oriented token design framework for the Mainnet ecosystem, which highlights structured standards for the launch of future tokens. The move is a breakthrough for the network as it continues to develop its Open Network phase. Through the establishment of token standards, Pi Network aims to offer developers a clear guideline on how to create tokens within the ecosystem.

Structured Token Standards and Emission Logic

The PiRC1 document describes guidelines for token creation, management, and distribution patterns in the ecosystem. The guidelines focus on real-world applications rather than hypothetical scenarios, promoting tokens that enable applications and services running on Mainnet. As per the design published, the ecosystem tokens would co-exist with the native Pi coin, enabling decentralized applications and digital commerce. The design specifies the emission logic to inject the tokens into the system in a structured fashion.

The document also outlines ways that are expected to facilitate liquidity creation. According to the proposed structure, funds raised from the launch of ecosystem tokens would go into liquidity pools and not directly to project teams. This is expected to improve the stability of trade flows and eliminate structural uncertainties.

Developers expected to implement the proposal can examine the technical details and offer comments before final implementation. Pi Network has published the framework publicly on GitHub to allow community members to contribute to its improvement.

Community Engagement and Ecosystem Development

The proposal has been framed by Pi Network as part of a larger initiative to promote community-driven governance and development. Members of the community can access the document and provide feedback during the feedback period. Industry analysts have pointed out that well-defined token standards can help remove confusion for developers working on blockchain networks. Well-structured supply dynamics and rules for token emissions can also help improve clarity for participants in the ecosystem.

The announcement comes at a time when Pi Network is celebrating the growth of its Mainnet ecosystem. Millions of users have completed identity verification and switched over to Mainnet, and developers are working on applications in the network environment.

Experts believe that standardized token frameworks could assist in attracting more developers with clearer operating parameters. The standardized design of tokens could also give the ecosystem a competitive edge over projects that do not have standardized guidelines. The Pi Network has not set a final timeline for implementation, as the proposal is still open for community feedback.

Highlighted Crypto News:

AI Automation Mishap Leads to $442K Memecoin Transfer on Solana

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main purpose of the PiRC1 token framework introduced by Pi Network?

AThe PiRC1 token framework provides structured standards for token creation, management, and distribution within the Pi Mainnet ecosystem, focusing on real-world applications and enabling decentralized applications and digital commerce.

QHow does the PiRC1 framework propose to handle funds raised from ecosystem token launches?

AFunds raised from ecosystem token launches would go into liquidity pools rather than directly to project teams, aiming to improve trade flow stability and eliminate structural uncertainties.

QWhere has Pi Network published the PiRC1 framework for community review and contribution?

APi Network has published the framework publicly on GitHub to allow community members to examine technical details, offer comments, and contribute to its improvement.

QHow does the PiRC1 framework aim to benefit the Pi Network ecosystem according to industry analysts?

AWell-defined token standards can remove confusion for developers, while structured supply dynamics and emission rules provide clarity for ecosystem participants, potentially attracting more developers and giving the ecosystem a competitive edge.

QWhat milestone is Pi Network celebrating alongside the introduction of the PiRC1 framework?

APi Network is celebrating the growth of its Mainnet ecosystem, with millions of users having completed identity verification and migrated to Mainnet, while developers are building applications in the network environment.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit23 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit23 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit31 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit31 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News35 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News35 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit42 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit42 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit51 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit51 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот