People Laid Off by AI Won't Disappear; They Will Become the Creators of the Next Economy

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-23

Анотація

The article argues that the real question surrounding AI is not whether it will cause unemployment, but what happens to the people displaced. AI is replacing not humans, but the standardized, replicable, and automatable parts of human work. This follows historical patterns where technological revolutions, from stone tools to computers, made old skills obsolete and dissolved old structures—but humanity adapted and reorganized. The author draws a parallel to China’s large-scale layoffs during state-owned enterprise reforms 30 years ago, which initially seemed catastrophic but eventually fueled the growth of a new private economy, new companies, and new types of jobs. Engineers, though among the first impacted, are also positioned to recover fastest. Their systemic understanding and proximity to new productive forces make them ideal candidates to adapt and create in the new economy. More importantly, AI is reshaping companies themselves—reducing organizational bloat, communication costs, and bureaucracy. This enables smaller, more agile teams and empowers strong creators who may have previously struggled with management rather than innovation. The core issue is not job loss, but self-definition: will individuals wait to be reassigned by the old system, or use new tools to reorganize production? AI accelerates differentiation—eliminating some jobs, shattering illusions for some, and offering others a chance to leap forward. The author’s view is that AI is dismantling an entir...

Author: WhiteForest

 

Everyone is asking the wrong question. The question is not "Will I lose my job?" but: Where do the unemployed go?

AI is not replace people; it replaces the parts of people that can already be standardized, replicated, and automated.

Think about it: humans originally evolved from monkeys.

Stone tools, writing, gunpowder, steam engines, electricity, computers. Every tool revolution has devalued a set of old skills, eliminated a set of old jobs, and collapsed a set of old orders. Humans did not disappear. Humans reorganized.

AI is the same pattern, just faster.

China Experienced a Larger-Scale Layoff Wave 30 Years Ago

Too many white-collar jobs are essentially about information搬运, rule application, and local optimization. Once models are smart enough, these jobs will inevitably be repriced. This is not an apocalypse; it's a clearance.

30 years ago, China experienced a more intense version. State-owned enterprise reforms led to massive layoffs. At the time, it seemed like the end for tens of millions of that generation. In retrospect, what disappeared was not the people, but the old positions. New private economies, new companies, and new jobs all grew out of that rupture. 15 years ago, a large proportion of China's listed companies actually inherited assets from the state-owned enterprise reforms.

Engineers Will Be the First to Be Impacted and the First to Recover

They understand abstraction the best, systems the best, and are closest to the new productive forces. When an engineer is laid off, it usually means that the part of their ability they were selling has matured enough to be packaged and automated. This is not a denial of their value; it is proof of the maturity of their past output.

But these people, like the state-owned enterprise laid-off workers 30 years ago, are precisely some of the smartest people of this era. Once these people enter the free market, the creativity they bring is immeasurable.

But most people overlook a more important point: AI is not just cutting jobs; it is rewriting the form of the company.

Most companies are not large because the problems require that many people. It's because the costs of communication, coordination, and execution are too high, so they can only keep adding people, layers, and processes.

AI is turning these organizational costs into software.

Companies will be smaller. What used to take 50 people will be done by 5 in the future. What used to require a team can be done by a strong individual with the right tools.

The Revenge of the Creators

The old game rewarded those who were good at managing large teams,搞 hierarchical coordination, and organizational expansion. This led to situations where HR became C-level or even CEO. Managing business was不如 managing people. Many of the best creators did not lose on judgment, product, or technology, but on their inability to operate an organization that increasingly resembled a bureaucratic machine.

AI weakens this shortcoming. In the next cycle, more small but strong companies will emerge. More people who are "not good at management but extremely good at creation" will be repriced. They did not lose to the market in the past; they lost to the organization. After AI lightens the organization, these people can directly transact with the world for the first time.

The Real Problem Is Not Unemployment, But How You Define Yourself

After the old positions disappear, are you someone who waits for the system to take you in, or are you someone who uses new tools to reorganize production?

AI will not淘汰 everyone equally. It accelerates differentiation. Some lose their jobs, some lose their illusions, and some use this reorganization to complete their leap.

My Judgment:

What AI lays off is not a group of people; it is an entire generation's superstition about stable career paths. The first people to be laid off will not disappear. Some of them will be the first to reorganize themselves, transforming from employees of the old system into creators of the next economy.

In every productivity revolution, what is淘汰 is not people, but those who refuse to rewrite themselves.

Those who最先 accept reality and begin to create a new world will prevail.

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core argument of the article regarding AI-induced job displacement?

AThe core argument is that AI is not eliminating people, but rather replacing standardized, replicable, and automatable parts of human labor. The key question isn't whether people will lose jobs, but where these displaced workers will go. The article posits that they will reorganize and become the driving force behind the next wave of economic creation, similar to historical technological revolutions.

QHow does the article use China's history to support its perspective on AI and employment?

AThe article draws a parallel to China's large-scale layoffs during state-owned enterprise reforms 30 years ago. While it seemed like an endpoint for millions at the time, it ultimately led to the emergence of a new private economy, new companies, and new jobs. The 'old positions' disappeared, not the people, and this historical 'clearance' became a source of new growth, with many current listed companies inheriting assets from that reform period.

QWhy does the article suggest that engineers, though heavily impacted, are also poised for a quick recovery?

AEngineers are described as the ones who best understand abstraction, systems, and are closest to the new productive forces (AI). Being laid off indicates that the specific skills they were selling have matured enough to be automated and packaged, which is actually proof of the value and maturity of their past work. As some of the smartest people, their entry into the free market is expected to unleash immense creativity.

QIn what way is AI 'rewriting the form of the company' according to the article?

AAI is transforming companies by drastically reducing organizational costs—such as those for communication, coordination, and execution—and turning them into software. This leads to smaller, more agile companies. Tasks that once required 50 people might only need 5, and what needed a team can now be done by a single strong individual with the right AI tools. This shift weakens the advantage of large, bureaucratic structures.

QWhat is meant by the 'Revenge of the Creators' in the context of AI's impact?

AThe 'Revenge of the Creators' refers to a shift where individuals who are 'extremely good at creating but not good at management' will be revalued. In the past, these creators often lost to those who excelled at managing large, hierarchical organizations. AI, by making organizations 'lighter' and reducing the need for complex management, allows these pure creators to transact directly with the world and compete more effectively, leading to a rise of small but powerful companies built on creativity rather than bureaucratic skill.

Пов'язані матеріали

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit3 год тому

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit3 год тому

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

South Korean stock market sees a dramatic shift in fund flows. On July 31, foreign investors made a record net purchase of approximately KRW 7.2 trillion in KOSPI stocks, marking a fundamental reversal from the persistent large-scale net outflows seen in previous months. This contributed to a significant narrowing of foreign net selling in July to KRW 9.8 trillion, down sharply from KRW 48.4 trillion in June and KRW 44.5 trillion in May. Simultaneously, domestic institutional pressure eased. South Korean pension funds and asset managers turned to a net buying position in July, purchasing KRW 1.0 trillion worth of KOSPI shares, contrasting with net sales in May and June. Market volatility is expected to be dampened by new financial regulations. Effective July 31, the Financial Services Commission tightened access for retail investors to single-stock leveraged ETFs by raising the minimum cash deposit requirement. Trading volumes for these products subsequently dropped to about 50% of their monthly average. Citigroup Research maintains its year-end KOSPI target of 10,000 points. The firm cites several supportive factors: the substantial easing of headwinds from capital outflows, a robust fundamental outlook for the semiconductor sector, historically low market valuations, strong economic fundamentals, and the potential for policy support from financial authorities if needed.

marsbit3 год тому

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

marsbit3 год тому

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ru8 год тому

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ru8 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити PEOPLE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Після придбання ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Легко торгуйте ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

616 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити PEOPLE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни PEOPLE (PEOPLE).

活动图片