Paxos Becomes First Blockchain-Native SEC-Approved Clearing Agency

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-05-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-29

Анотація

Paxos has become the first blockchain-native company to be approved and registered as a clearing agency by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Its subsidiary, Paxos Securities Settlement Company, is now authorized to act as a central securities depository in the United States. This registration is the culmination of seven years of work with the SEC, including a 2019 No-Action Letter and a settlement pilot involving major financial institutions. The approval marks a significant step in the convergence of blockchain technology with traditional capital markets. A registered blockchain clearinghouse reduces the need for banks and brokerages to build their own crypto-based infrastructure. Paxos's earlier pilot demonstrated that blockchain-based post-trade infrastructure could enable same-day settlement, lower costs, and improve operational efficiency within a regulated framework. Paxos is also known as a stablecoin issuer, with products like Pax Gold (PAXG) and PayPal USD (PYUSD).

The first “blockchain-native” company to get registration as a clearing agency from the US SEC is Paxos, a blockchain infrastructure platform and stablecoin issuer. On Thursday, Paxos said that its subsidiary, Paxos Securities Settlement Company, has been authorized by the SEC to serve as a central securities depository in the United States, making it “the only blockchain-native firm” in this capacity.

Charles Cascarilla, co-founder and CEO of Paxos stated:

“Our clearing agency registration is the result of seven years of work with the SEC, beginning with our No-Action Letter in 2019 and the settlement pilot we operated with some of the world’s largest and most sophisticated financial institutions.”

The business went on to say that this clearance is a “critical piece of financial market infrastructure” because of the ongoing convergence of blockchain technology with conventional capital markets.

Securities Settlement with Blockchain-based Market Infrastructure

Clearing agencies guarantee that securities trades are carried out in a tidy manner. Clearing and settlement providers are essential to the stock trading process because they authenticate trades, pair buyers and sellers, and guarantee a smooth transfer of funds and securities.

The need for banks and brokerages for building crypto-based infrastructure is alleviated by a registered blockchain clearinghouse that has been approved by the SEC. After receiving a no-action letter from the SEC in October 2019, Paxos was able to begin testing a settlement service for US stocks that relied on blockchain technology. The service was officially launched in February 2020.

The pilot, according to Paxos, proved that, within a properly regulated environment, blockchain-based post-trade infrastructure may bring about same-day settlement while simultaneously lowering costs and increasing operating efficiency. Paxos is a digital asset and stablecoin issuer. Some of its products include Pax Gold (PAXG), Global Dollar (USDG), and PayPal USD (PYUSD).

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Sui Network Recovers From Hours-Long Network Stall Triggered by Upgrade Bug

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the significance of Paxos becoming the first blockchain-native SEC-approved clearing agency?

AIt signifies a major regulatory milestone, allowing a blockchain-native firm to serve as a central securities depository and clearing agency in the U.S., bridging blockchain technology with traditional capital markets infrastructure.

QWhat specific Paxos subsidiary received the SEC's clearing agency registration?

APaxos Securities Settlement Company, a subsidiary of Paxos, received the registration to serve as a central securities depository in the United States.

QHow long did the process take for Paxos to achieve this registration with the SEC, and what was a key early step?

AThe process took seven years. A key early step was receiving a No-Action Letter from the SEC in 2019, which allowed Paxos to begin testing its blockchain-based settlement service.

QWhat are the potential benefits of using blockchain-based post-trade infrastructure for securities settlement, as demonstrated by Paxos's pilot?

AAccording to Paxos's pilot, blockchain-based infrastructure can enable same-day settlement (T+0), reduce costs, and increase operational efficiency compared to traditional systems.

QName at least two stablecoins or digital assets issued by Paxos as mentioned in the article.

APaxos issues digital assets and stablecoins including Pax Gold (PAXG), Global Dollar (USDG), and PayPal USD (PYUSD).

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitcoin Bull Michael Saylor Hints At Next Purchase With Cryptic Post

MicroStrategy's stock (MSTR) has declined sharply, dropping over 9% in a day and 25% over the past month, following the company's first Bitcoin sale in years. The firm sold 32 BTC for approximately $2.5 million, raising investor concerns about further sales. Meanwhile, Executive Chairman Michael Saylor sparked speculation of a renewed Bitcoin purchase with an unusual midweek social media post stating "Back to Work," breaking from his typical Sunday routine. The company holds about $900 million in cash and recently raised $128 million through share sales. Despite the recent activity, MicroStrategy remains the world's largest corporate Bitcoin holder with 843,706 BTC. Additional speculation arose from the firm moving Bitcoin to Coinbase Prime.

bitcoinist9 хв тому

Bitcoin Bull Michael Saylor Hints At Next Purchase With Cryptic Post

bitcoinist9 хв тому

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit31 хв тому

marsbit31 хв тому

Visualizing Musk's Wealth: $3.6 Million Per Hour, Average Person Needs 11 Million Years of Work

Elon Musk is on the verge of becoming the world's first trillionaire, with a current estimated net worth of $970 billion. This wealth, largely tied to equity in SpaceX and Tesla, translates to him accumulating roughly $992 per second or $3.6 million per hour on average over his 31-year career. His fortune surpasses the annual GDP of over 125 countries and represents about 3% of U.S. GDP, double the relative wealth of historical figures like John D. Rockefeller. For perspective, an average U.S. household earning the median income would need to work over 11 million years to amass a comparable sum. Musk's wealth could buy approximately 2.4 million average American homes, all 32 NFL teams plus every NBA team, or over 10,000 private jets with operating costs. The analysis highlights the staggering scale and concentration of modern wealth, driven by successes in electric vehicles, space exploration, and artificial intelligence.

marsbit34 хв тому

Visualizing Musk's Wealth: $3.6 Million Per Hour, Average Person Needs 11 Million Years of Work

marsbit34 хв тому

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit39 хв тому

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit39 хв тому

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

As Bitcoin and Ethereum prices drop significantly, two major corporate treasury holders, Strategy and Bitmine, are facing massive unrealized losses—approximately $100 billion and $90 billion, respectively. The article compares their financial health and underlying risks. Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH, relies primarily on equity financing (like ATM offerings) and has substantial cash reserves, alongside staking income from its ETH holdings. It plans a $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy, holding Bitcoin, is burdened by significant convertible debt and preferred stock dividends, with cash reserves covering only about six months of its annual dividend obligations. Strategy's leverage is higher, and it faces potential liquidity pressure if BTC prices fall further, possibly forcing asset sales. While both companies are under pressure, Bitmine’s financial structure appears more resilient, whereas Strategy’s high leverage makes it more vulnerable to continued market declines.

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни F (F).