PANews Crypto Year-End Review: Did Your 2025 Airdrop Harvesting Score Pass?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2025-12-18Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-18

Анотація

PANews Year-End Crypto Review: Was Your 2025 Airdrop Farming Performance Up to Standard? Looking back at 2025, more and more participants have had to admit that the returns from airdrop farming this year were far from ideal. While there was no shortage of projects and participation remained high, very few stood out as clear successes—shrinking airdrops, token launches hitting peak prices immediately, and insufficient liquidity support have become the norm. What was once considered a low-risk "consensus dividend" has now turned into a highly competitive screening mechanism. As the easy gains fade, the underlying issues have become clearer: Should participants continue engaging indiscriminately, or is it time to reassess their investment of time, risk exposure, and expected returns?

Looking back at 2025, more and more participants have to admit: the returns from airdrop harvesting this year were far from ideal. There was no shortage of projects, and participation rates remained high, but truly successful ones were few and far between—shrinking airdrops, tokens peaking at launch, and insufficient liquidity support have increasingly become the norm.

Once considered a low-risk "consensus dividend," airdrop harvesting now resembles a highly competitive filtering mechanism. As the红利 (dividends) fade, the underlying issues become clearer:

Should one continue participating indiscriminately, or reassess their time, risk, and expectations?

#PANewsCryptoYearEndReview

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main topic of the PANews year-end review article?

AThe article is a year-end review focusing on the disappointing returns and increasing challenges of 'Airdrop Hunting' (撸毛) in the cryptocurrency space for the year 2025.

QAccording to the article, what was the general trend for airdrop rewards in 2025?

AThe trend was that airdrop rewards continued to shrink, with tokens often hitting their peak price at launch and a general lack of liquidity to support them, making returns largely unsatisfactory.

QHow does the article describe the current state of 'Airdrop Hunting'?

AIt describes it as a highly competitive and selective mechanism that is no longer a low-risk 'consensus dividend,' but rather an activity where the红利 (hongli, meaning dividend/bonus) has faded, forcing participants to re-evaluate their strategy.

QWhat key question does the article pose to its readers about their participation?

AIt asks readers to consider whether they should continue participating indiscriminately or if they should re-examine their investment of time, the risks involved, and their expected returns.

QWhat specific cryptocurrency event or practice is being critiqued in this article?

AThe article is critiquing the practice of 'Airdrop Hunting' or '撸毛 (lū máo)', which refers to the strategy of participating in numerous crypto project airdrops in hopes of earning valuable token rewards.

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru16 хв тому

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru16 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片