Outsmarting Algorithmic Manipulation on Twitter: How to Grow Your Account with Dignity?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-19

Анотація

This article analyzes the significant decline in engagement and reach experienced by many Twitter (X) content creators, attributing it to two major platform changes. First, the platform has weakened the "Following" tab, defaulting users to the algorithmic "For You" feed. Second, it has shifted from a chronological timeline to algorithmically recommended content, heavily influenced by its AI model, Grok. This results in a polarized content performance: deep, analytical posts receive minimal views and zero interaction, while sensationalist, controversial, or low-quality content (e.g., clickbait, politics, or adult material) often goes viral. The author argues this strategy, designed to increase ad revenue by keeping users in a recommendation loop, ultimately degrades the platform's community and commercial value. It incentivizes "farming" engagement through divisive or shallow content, driving away high-quality vertical creators who are increasingly migrating to platforms like Substack. The piece concludes with a three-part strategy for creators: 1) adapt by mixing deep content with high-engagement hooks and subscribing to Premium for better reach, 2) build direct audience connections through newsletters or private groups, and 3) wait for potential platform improvements. The core message is a call to maintain integrity while navigating the algorithmic challenges.

If you are a Twitter blogger, you have been experiencing abnormal phenomena for nearly half a year.

Specifically, your traffic and interaction data suddenly plummeted at a certain point, and the nature of viral content has become strange—deep analyses get dozens of views with zero interaction, while posting provocative or sensational content leads to a surge in followers.

The main content of this article is about why this phenomenon occurs. In other words, how did the clever design of the X platform ruin the vertical audience you worked so hard to build?

Platform Weakens the Following Page, Defaults to the Recommendation Page

This is caused by two measures from the platform:

· Weakening the "Following" page and defaulting users to the "For You" recommendation page; this has become so severe that some bloggers have to write custom scripts to force a switch back to the Following page.

· Phasing out the chronological display of followers' content in favor of algorithmic recommendations.

The reason is that last year, the platform introduced Grok as a weighting factor in algorithmic judgments. Without delving into the complexities, the result is: This makes posts either completely silent or suddenly blessed by the algorithm, going viral with no middle ground.

The motivation behind this is easy to understand: if users only see content from accounts they follow, platform ad insertion would be very awkward. For example, it would have to insert ads abruptly, like on WeChat, and then fabricate comments and likes from friends below the ad.

This seems to enhance the platform's commercial value in the short term, but in practice, it doesn't work out that way, especially in the casino-like atmosphere of the crypto circle.

@supermao has an incisive discussion on this in an article: Everyone says CT content is declining? What is the root cause? Have you been to Las Vegas? Have you seen high rollers in casinos needing to read newspapers or books? What they need are presidential suites, luxury, and beautiful women. The crypto circle is essentially too heavily narrative-driven around gambling, with everything revolving around gains, losses, and bets. More and more smart people realize that if your entire life is tied directly to market trends, it's hard to maintain long-term physical and mental health and clear thinking.

The result of these two measures is that a large amount of paid promotional content, such as AI-spun articles, suggestive images, borderline content, and political sensationalism, dominates users' recommended timeline. Rogue matrix accounts have become mainstream.

You probably understand how algorithms work better than I do: the more users click on this type of content, the system automatically judges it as your interest, and you get more of it. Eventually, the recommendation feed is full of this stuff.

The Destruction of Deep Content

The result: Many niche bloggers find their tweet traffic incredibly strange. They spend a long time writing deep content that gets dozens of views and zero interaction, but posting a sexy picture or some anti-social rant suddenly gains them hundreds of followers.

In reality, the attention channel for their vertical content distribution has been hijacked by the recommendation mechanism. Their followers haven't seen what they've been posting for a long time.

The following image depicts a common scenario:

In the end, vertical bloggers are forced to post content that pleases the base audience to survive, or else they should leave the platform and find a new one.

This leads to a massive loss of high-quality creators. Social platforms rely heavily on atmosphere. Weibo, Zhihu, and Bilibili have at times turned into public toilets, filled with misogyny, misandry, political sensationalism, and various anti-social, hostile content, all stemming from a loss of control over community atmosphere. After all, content that creates conflict and suggestive images are the most attention-grabbing. While this increases interaction in the short term, it leads to a dual loss of quality content and commercial value in the long run.

Many bloggers, like @nic_carter and @notboringco, are gradually moving towards Substack.

Rebuilding Your Influence with a Network Value Strategy

All week, Dan Koe's "One Day to Reset" long-form article became a viral hit.

This article had over 150 million reads. For a non-celebrity, non-president, non-billionaire to have traffic at this level, it must be officially boosted. Elon Musk's retweet and the million-dollar new concept essay contest are telling, and it also somewhat supports Nikita Bier's product-driven growth strategy.

I wrote about his thinking in a profile of Nikita Bier. It essentially revolves around one point: network value.

· Increase interaction between nodes in the network—content that stirs controversy, recommendation feeds.

· What kind of content increases network value?—Deep articles, preferably professional鸡汤 (chicken soup for the soul with expertise).

· Increased network value—Subscriptions + ad revenue up.

Increasing network value is necessary. Although major advertisers like Apple and Disney have returned, and subscription numbers have grown, Twitter still reported a net loss of $577 million in the third quarter of last year. This effort needs to be intensified.

Thinking about it this way, our action guide can be divided into three parts:

1. If you can't beat them, join them:

· First, buy a Premium subscription. You need the article writing function, right? Traffic now revolves around Blue V checks. At the very least, it allows paid promotions to reach more users.

· Wait for the algorithm's blessing. Mix deep articles with high-engagement hooks (like questions, hot takes).

2. Customized Service: Once traffic comes, build WeChat/Twitter/Telegram small groups or a Newsletter to ensure point-to-point reach. I have already developed the habit of reading deep content in my email.

3. Wait: Do nothing, just keep posting content diligently. I have a feeling that @nikitabier will probably start solving this problem soon.

I can't write any further here. In short, it's that slogan:

Let's grow our accounts with dignity!

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the two main platform changes that have led to a decline in traffic for vertical content creators on X (Twitter)?

AThe two main changes are: 1. The weakening of the 'Following' tab, with users being defaulted to the 'For You' recommendation page. 2. The shift away from a chronological feed of followed accounts toward an algorithm-driven recommendation system.

QAccording to the article, what type of content tends to go viral under the new algorithm, and what type suffers?

AContent featuring clickbait, sensationalism, borderline (risqué) material, and politically charged hot takes tends to go viral and gain followers. In contrast, deep, analytical, and vertical-specific content suffers, often receiving few views and zero interaction.

QWhat is the stated business motive for the platform (X) implementing these algorithmic changes?

AThe primary business reason is to better integrate and monetize advertising. If users only see content from accounts they follow, inserting ads is more abrupt and less native. The algorithmic feed allows for smoother ad integration and increases the potential for ads to go viral, thereby boosting the platform's commercial value.

QWhat long-term negative consequence for the platform's health does the article predict due to these changes?

AThe article predicts a mass exodus of high-quality, vertical content creators. This will lead to a degradation of the community atmosphere, filling it with more divisive, sensational, and low-quality content. While this may boost short-term engagement, it will cause a long-term loss of both quality content and commercial value.

QWhat are the three suggested strategies for creators to 'stand up and grow their account' despite the algorithm?

AThe three suggested strategies are: 1. 'If you can't beat them, join them': Subscribe to X Premium for better reach, and mix deep content with high-engagement hooks (like questions or hot takes) to attract the algorithm's favor. 2. 'Customized Service': Direct traffic to private channels like WeChat groups, Telegram groups, or a Newsletter to ensure direct reach to an audience. 3. 'Wait': Do nothing but continue posting quality content, with the hope that the platform will eventually address the issue.

Пов'язані матеріали

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit9 год тому

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit9 год тому

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit10 год тому

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit10 год тому

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit10 год тому

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit10 год тому

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit10 год тому

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit10 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片