OpenClaw Imposes Strict No-Crypto Rule on Discord

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-23

Анотація

OpenClaw has implemented a strict no-cryptocurrency policy on its Discord server, banning any mentions of Bitcoin or other digital assets. This decision follows a high-profile scam involving a fraudulent Solana-based token, $CLAWD, which was promoted using abandoned social media handles during OpenClaw's rebrand. The token reached a $16 million market cap before crashing over 90% after creator Peter Steinberger denied any involvement. Although a user was temporarily banned for referencing Bitcoin block height in a technical discussion, the zero-tolerance policy remains. OpenClaw aims to prevent brand misuse and protect users from scams, prioritizing security over open discussion of blockchain topics.

OpenClaw has introduced a strict no-crypto policy across its Discord channels following a high-profile token scam linked to its recent rebrand. Peter Steinberger, the creator of OpenClaw, has confirmed that any mention of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies will lead to a ban from the server.

The policy came into the spotlight after a user was banned for mentioning the block height of Bitcoin as a timing reference in a technical conversation. The user posted about the incident on a public forum, and Steinberger was forced to clarify the server policy.

Blanket Ban Covers All Crypto Mentions

Steinberger has justified the harsh policy by saying that all users agree to abide by the server rules when they register. The policy applies to all forms of cryptocurrency references, whether in technical conversations or otherwise.

The banned user has explained that they made the reference to Bitcoin block height only for the sake of benchmarking. Steinberger has since agreed to unban the user and asked them to send their username to be let back in.

The policy still stands despite the user being unbanned. Steinberger has said that OpenClaw will enforce a zero-tolerance policy on any cryptocurrency-related conversation to avoid confusion and exploitation.

$CLAWD Scam Sparks Crackdown

The security measure follows a scam involving a Solana-based token named $CLAWD. The incident occurred during OpenClaw’s rebranding process after Steinberger received a trademark notice that required a name change.

Scammers exploited the transition period. They seized abandoned social media handles before the project claimed new ones. The attackers used those accounts to promote the $CLAWD token, suggesting it represented an official launch of OpenClaw.

The token quickly rose to a market capitalization of around $16 million. This was due to the assumption of legitimacy by the traders. However, when Steinberger denied involvement in the project, the token crashed by over 90%.

Steinberger was accused by early buyers of being behind a pump-and-dump scam. However, he denied the allegations and stated that he would never create a cryptocurrency.

You can check the trends in crypto scam reporting on Chainalysis, and the guidelines for the Discord community can be found on the official Discord policy page.

Security Risks Extend Beyond Tokens

Later, security experts found that there were hundreds of vulnerable OpenClaw instances available online. They also found dozens of malicious plugins, many of which were intended for crypto traders.

The $CLAWD scandal brought the crypto-related communities under greater scrutiny. OpenClaw has since decided to remove all crypto-related discussions to ensure there is no risk of brand misuse.

Steinberger’s position also indicates the increasing conflict between open-source projects and crypto trading. Although some communities are open to token economies, OpenClaw has decided to distance itself.

The policy may be frustrating for users who participate in blockchain-related technical discussions. However, the OpenClaw team feels that it is more important to be clear than flexible.

By ensuring that all cryptocurrency discussions are banned, the project hopes to protect its brand and prevent misuse in the future. With the constant emergence of crypto-related scams on social media platforms, communities are increasingly turning to hard-line moderation policies.

OpenClaw’s policy also indicates that it is taking a defensive position. The project prioritizes brand protection and user safety over open communication about blockchain technology. Whether this policy will stick in the long run will depend on the reaction of the community and the reduction of security threats.

Highlighted Crypto News:

SBI Holdings Launches Tokenized Bonds with XRP Rewards to Investors

TagsBitcoinChainalysisCrypto ScamDiscordSolana

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the new policy that OpenClaw has implemented on its Discord server?

AOpenClaw has implemented a strict no-crypto policy, banning any mention of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies on its Discord channels.

QWhy did OpenClaw decide to enforce this strict no-cryptocurrency rule?

AThe policy was enacted following a high-profile scam involving a Solana-based token named $CLAWD, which fraudulently used the OpenClaw brand, and to prevent future brand misuse and exploitation.

QWhat incident brought the new policy into the spotlight after a user was banned?

AThe policy gained attention when a user was banned for mentioning the Bitcoin block height as a timing reference in a technical discussion, which they claimed was for benchmarking purposes.

QWhat was the result of the $CLAWD token scam after Steinberger denied involvement?

AAfter Peter Steinberger denied any involvement with the $CLAWD token, its value crashed by over 90% from its peak market capitalization of around $16 million.

QBeyond token scams, what other security risks were discovered related to OpenClaw?

ASecurity experts found hundreds of vulnerable OpenClaw instances online and dozens of malicious plugins, many of which were targeted at crypto traders.

Пов'язані матеріали

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手45 хв тому

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手45 хв тому

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1 год тому

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片