Only xxx Can Save the Crypto World? Let 'Lobster' Play Prediction Markets

比推Опубліковано о 2026-03-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-17

Анотація

This article discusses recent hot topics in the crypto community, as shared by influencers on X (formerly Twitter). Key points include: - Debate around an AI arbitrage bot allegedly earning $98K on Polymarket using Claude. Skeptics point to potential survivorship bias, liquidity constraints, and the rapid decay of alpha once strategies are public. - A resource sharing over 11,000 high-quality image generation prompts for Nano Banana Pro. - Commentary on Venus Protocol, highlighting its vulnerability to repeated exploits, with a linked analysis of how to profit from a recent attack. - A controversial opinion piece by influencer @BTCdayu arguing that only Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) can "save crypto." The author claims that despite SBF's crimes and 25-year sentence, his genius is needed to address current industry crises: VC-backed altcoins scamming users, Bitcoin miners pivoting to AI, broken tokenomics, and a lack of new narratives. SBF's background at Jane Street, his innovative FTX trading system, and his early bets on AI (like Anthropic) are cited as reasons he could drive integration between AI and crypto, potentially pushing BTC to $1 million. This sparked heated discussion, with replies noting the improbability of a pardon, SBF's likely shift to AI, and that this nostalgia reflects a bygone era of "capital, narrative, and runaway imagination." The article concludes with links to the news outlet's social channels. All content is presented as personal opinion and not invest...

Dear readers, hello~

What were the crypto KOLs talking about in the past 24 hours?

Note: The following content is compiled from the X platform and represents personal opinions, not the stance of this platform, and does not constitute investment advice.

AI Arbitrage Bot: Real or Fake?

Popular Replies:

  • Someone claimed to have made $98K using Claude on Polymarket. I verified: the money is real, the story is fabricated.

  • If the little lobster wants to do 5-minute market detection, the detection frequency should be at least at the ms level, right? Then the consumption of tokens could make someone a "millionaire in debt."

  • 86 times sounds scary, but there are a few issues: 1) Sample bias? Losing bots don't tweet. 2) How much scale can Polymarket's liquidity support? 3) Once the strategy is public, the Alpha disappears. To truly verify sustainability, at least 3 months of backtesting + maximum drawdown is needed;

  • Is this AI just survivor bias? Most losing AIs are too ashamed to show up;

Over 11,000 High-Quality Image Generation Prompts for Nano Banana Pro

Resource self-service: https://github.com/YouMind-OpenLab/awesome-nano-banana-pro-prompts


Venus is Either Being Hacked or on the Way to Being Hacked

Recap on how to profit from the Venus THE attack: https://x.com/hklst4r/status/2033182792029294736

Who Can Save the Crypto World?

Crypto KOL @BTCdayu wrote: Only SBF Can Save the Crypto World.

The author believes that although SBF's misappropriation of funds is a serious crime deserving of a 25-year sentence, the crypto world urgently needs his genius mind to save it from the current crisis: VC altcoins scamming retail, BTC mining farms transitioning to AI, token economics becoming a joke, and a lack of new narratives. SBF, from Jane Street, innovated the FTX trading system, heavily invested in AI projects like Anthropic (potential trillion-dollar returns), and understands the integration of AI and Crypto. If pardoned, he could reconstruct computing power, build an AI Agent settlement layer, inject new capital energy, and push BTC to $1 million. His core view: Forgiveness is not forgetting, but allowing genius to create value under regulation and rules.

The article sparked heated discussion:

Popular Replies:

  • Even if SBF is pardoned, he might not work in crypto anymore, as his business acumen in AI is even higher.

  • He cannot be pardoned. First, he backed the wrong side back then. Second, if you're going the political donation route, you绝对不能中途跳船 (absolutely cannot jump ship midway).

  • Remembering SBF is actually remembering the crypto era of "capital, narrative, and imagination expanding uncontrollably." In that cycle, VC money flooded in like liquidity, "effective altruism" could coexist with high leverage, and big fools holding onto a belief coin could see hundred or thousand-fold gains... So it's about time to wash up and sleep.

  • Staying sober in a bear market is more precious than幻想暴富 (fantasizing about getting rich quick).

  • Surviving > Making money


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620287

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main argument presented in the article regarding who can save the crypto circle?

AThe article presents the argument that only SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried), despite his criminal conviction, can save the crypto circle with his genius mind, innovative capabilities from his Jane Street background, and his foresight in AI and crypto fusion.

QWhat are the key criticisms or concerns raised about the AI arbitrage bot story mentioned in the article?

AThe key criticisms include potential survivorship bias (only profitable bots are publicized), questions about the scalability given Polymarket's liquidity, and the concern that the trading alpha would disappear once the strategy is made public.

QAccording to the article, what was the Venus protocol incident about?

AThe Venus protocol was reportedly exploited, and the article includes a link to a复盘 (post-mortem analysis) on how to profit from the Venus THE attack, indicating it was a security incident or hack.

QWhat is the Nano Banana Pro mentioned in the article, and what resource is provided for it?

ANano Banana Pro appears to be an AI image generation tool or model. The article provides a link to a GitHub repository containing over 11,000 high-quality image generation prompts for it.

QWhat is the general sentiment among commentators regarding the 'Only SBF can save crypto' proposal?

AThe sentiment is largely skeptical and critical. Commentators point out that SBF is unlikely to be pardoned, that he might not return to crypto even if he was, and that the piece is more a nostalgic reflection on a past era of crypto excess rather than a practical solution.

Пов'язані матеріали

From Gas Limit to 'Keyed Nonces', How to Understand the Next Step in Ethereum Scalability?

Ethereum’s scalability efforts are shifting toward a user-centric approach—focusing not only on higher TPS, but on translating technical upgrades into lower costs, smoother operations, and better wallet experiences. Two recent developments highlight this direction: - **Raising the Gas Limit to 200 million**: Following the Fusaka upgrade that increased it to 60 million, a consensus has formed around a potential future increase to 200 million. This would boost Ethereum’s execution capacity, but it is planned alongside other upgrades—such as ePBS, Block-Level Access Lists (BAL), and EIP-8037—to manage state growth and keep node operation viable for average participants. - **Keyed Nonces (EIP-8250)**: This proposal aims to improve how transactions are queued. Instead of a single linear nonce per account, it introduces multiple independent nonce domains. This prevents different types of transactions—such as private payments, session keys, or batch operations—from blocking each other. Vitalik Buterin views this as a foundational step toward better privacy support and more flexible state scalability. Together, these upgrades are part of a broader move to push complexity from wallets, DApps, and relays back into the protocol layer. For everyday users, this means future Ethereum interactions could become less congested, more intuitive, and safer—especially as core improvements in account abstraction, cross-L2 interoperability, and node decentralization continue to progress. Ultimately, Ethereum is evolving to handle not just more transactions, but more varied and complex on-chain use cases while preserving its decentralized foundation.

marsbit8 хв тому

From Gas Limit to 'Keyed Nonces', How to Understand the Next Step in Ethereum Scalability?

marsbit8 хв тому

Leaving OpenAI, How Much Has Their Net Worth Increased?

Former OpenAI employees have collectively accrued near-trillion dollar valuations through ventures and investments, charting AI's future. The article highlights two main paths: founding high-value companies like Anthropic and Perplexity, or applying insider insights as investors. Leopold Aschenbrenner exemplifies the investor path. After being fired from OpenAI, he leveraged firsthand knowledge of AI's massive energy demands to make hugely successful public market bets on nuclear and fuel cell companies, practicing "cross-industry cognitive arbitrage." Other alumni, like the Zero Shot VC fund founders, use their technical foresight for early-stage investing. Their key advantage lies not just in picking winners, but in knowing which technical approaches are likely dead ends—a "veto list" derived from internal OpenAI experience. Angel investing within the network, as seen with Mira Murati and Sam Altman, operates on deep, pre-existing understanding of a founder's capabilities, reducing due diligence to near zero. This creates an ecosystem bound by a shared belief in AGI's imminent arrival, differing from networks like the "PayPal Mafia" which were built on shared past struggles. The shift of these builders to investors signals a profound conviction: their situational awareness of the AI landscape is now so clear that deploying capital based on that judgment is more efficient than building themselves. They are allocating bets on the future they helped shape from the inside.

marsbit19 хв тому

Leaving OpenAI, How Much Has Their Net Worth Increased?

marsbit19 хв тому

Countdown to the AI Bull Market? Wall Street Tech Veteran: This Year Is Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%

"AI Bull Market Countdown? Wall Street Veteran: This Year Feels Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%" In an interview, veteran tech analyst Dan Niles draws parallels between the current AI boom and the 1997-98 period of the internet boom, suggesting the bull run isn't over yet. The core new driver is identified as "Agentic AI," which performs multi-step tasks and consumes vastly more computing power than conversational AI. This shift is expected to boost demand for cloud infrastructure and benefit CPU makers like Intel and AMD, potentially pressuring GPU leader Nvidia. However, Niles warns of significant short-term overbought conditions in semiconductors. His central warning is for a potential major market correction of 30-50% starting in early 2027. Drivers include a slowdown from high growth comparables, the outsized capital demands of companies like OpenAI, and a wave of massive tech IPOs sucking liquidity from the market. A J.P. Morgan survey of 56 global investors aligns with this view, finding that 54% expect a >30% U.S. stock correction by 2027. Among mega-cap tech, Niles favors Google due to its full-stack AI capabilities and cash flow, expresses concern about Meta's user growth, and sees potential for Apple's AI Siri and foldable iPhone. Niles advises investors to be nimble, hold significant cash, and closely monitor the conflicting signals from equities, oil prices, and bond yields, which he believes cannot all be correct simultaneously.

marsbit53 хв тому

Countdown to the AI Bull Market? Wall Street Tech Veteran: This Year Is Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%

marsbit53 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片