NYSE Plans to Launch 24/7 Tokenized Stock Trading, Leaving "Competitors" Stunned

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-01-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-19

Анотація

NYSE plans to launch a 24/7 tokenized stock trading and on-chain settlement platform, a move seen as a direct response to Nasdaq's similar application submitted last September. The proposed platform would allow round-the-clock trading of U.S. stocks and ETFs, fractional shares, stablecoin-based settlements, and instant settlement, while maintaining equal dividend and governance rights for tokenized stocks. NYSE's parent company ICE is also collaborating with major banks to develop tokenized deposit and clearing infrastructure. This initiative is viewed as a significant step in merging traditional finance with blockchain technology, potentially eliminating the distinction between crypto and traditional assets. While some industry experts welcome it as a major modernization that brings global accessibility and efficiency, others express concerns about increased market complexity, the impact on younger investors, and the potential marginalization of existing crypto RWA projects due to NYSE's massive liquidity advantage. The approval process by the SEC is expected to take until late 2026, leaving a window of opportunity for crypto-native platforms to leverage their strengths in areas like permissionless access and global liquidity.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

"Flash Crash Monday" is not over yet. Just now, the crypto market was hit with another bombshell—according to multiple media sources, the NYSE plans to launch a tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform supporting 24/7 trading. After investing $2 billion in Polymarket last year, the ICE Group is once again joining the wave of cryptocurrency transformation, this time using its stock exchange as the vehicle. It is worth mentioning that as early as last September, the "competitor" Nasdaq had already submitted an application to the SEC for tokenized stock trading. The NYSE's move is also interpreted by the outside world as a response to competition among stock exchanges.

Odaily Planet Daily will briefly summarize the market views related to this event and explore its potential impact.

NYSE Can't Sit Still: A More Radical "On-Chain Tokenized Stock Solution" Than Nasdaq

After Trump took office, the U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory environment changed dramatically. As a result, crypto IPOs, stablecoins, PayFi, and DeFi have swept away the policy gloom of the Biden era and are developing rapidly. According to statistics, last year's stablecoin trading volume reached $33 trillion, a sharp increase of 72% year-on-year. Behind this is the substantial revenue and profits earned by stablecoin issuers Tether and Circle, as well as the massive liquidity that can be directed to the stock securities market.

Moreover, unlike Nasdaq's application to the SEC for tokenized stock trading last September, nearly six months later, the NYSE's moves related to "tokenized stock trading" are not just an application to regulators but a complete set of on-chain solutions. Recommended reading: "The Self-Revolution of U.S. Stock Exchanges: Nasdaq Applies for Tokenized Stock Trading, Targeting a Trillion-Dollar Market."

Specifically, the NYSE's "on-chain tokenized stock solution" includes the following three aspects:

  1. This is a tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform, planning to support 24/7 trading of U.S. stocks and ETF funds, fractional share trading, stablecoin-based fund settlement, and instant delivery, and will combine NYSE's existing matching engine with a blockchain settlement system.
  2. According to the NYSE's plan, tokenized stocks will have the same dividends and governance rights as traditional securities.
  3. NYSE's parent company ICE is also collaborating with banking giants such as BNY Mellon and Citigroup to explore tokenized deposits and clearing infrastructure to support cross-time zone, round-the-clock fund and margin management.

In comparison, if Nasdaq's tokenized stock application seems like a "new bottle for old wine" move in response to policy, then the NYSE's plan seems like a "new retail trading platform" that integrates all links from "brewing-packaging-distribution-recycling."

Most importantly, the NYSE's "tokenized stock" trading platform supports 24/7 trading, which was originally one of the advantages of various cryptocurrencies over securities stocks. Now, this advantage becomes a joke in the face of the massive asset targets and liquidity of the world's largest stock exchange, the NYSE.

As a result, there are some pessimistic views in the crypto market: "The RWA sector of the cryptocurrency market and its increasingly tight liquidity will face the strictest 'father.' Compared to the NYSE, which has an annual trading volume of over a hundred trillion dollars, crypto RWA projects can almost be said to be non-existent."

What Do Industry Practitioners Think: Mixed Impacts, The Past Is the Past, The Present Is Now

In 1792, 24 securities brokers signed the Buttonwood Agreement under a buttonwood tree outside 68 Wall Street in New York, marking the birth of the predecessor of the NYSE. At that time, limited by the small number of investment targets and limited market activity, stock trading hours were more flexible, without strict continuous trading sessions. Brokers mainly conducted transactions through auctions or informal methods.

On March 8, 1817, the organization drafted a charter and officially changed its name to the New York Stock Exchange Board.

In May 1887, the NYSE standardized stock trading hours to "Monday to Friday: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.; Saturday: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m."

In 1952, Saturday trading was officially canceled.

In 1985, stock trading opening time was moved forward to 9:30 a.m., and closing was extended to 4:00 p.m., forming the current 9:30–16:00 session, which has lasted for about 41 years.

If the NYSE's application for 24/7 tokenized stock trading is approved, it means that this decades-long or even centuries-old "limited-time model" will become history. From this perspective, the crypto market has gained high recognition from the mainstream financial world.

Pro View: The Era's Train Is Roaring Forward

BTC OG and BankToTheFuture founder Simon Dixon posted, "Nothing can stop this (era's) train. Tokens are IOUs for actual assets held by custodians, supplementing DTCC claims. All-day trading can be achieved without tokens. This is an upgraded version of the monitoring state. You will own nothing, and you will be happy." The accompanying picture shows BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and Coinbase CEO Brain Armstrong embracing.

Indian crypto KOL Open4profit posted, "(This will) allow the market to react immediately to global news; AI and algorithms will play a greater role in pricing and risk management; this is a major change for the stock market, pay close attention to liquidity changes."

Redstone DeFi co-founder Marcin saw a "startup opportunity," saying, "This is a good start and fits exactly with what we are going to do next."

Wintermute OTC business head Jake O also highly affirmed this: "Traditional infrastructure can extend trading hours but cannot solve T+1/2 friction or eliminate rent-seeking behaviors that increase costs and delays. Ironically, cryptocurrency solved this years ago: 24/7 trading, instant settlement, global access, no gatekeepers or (traditional bank) 'data fees.' Integration is inevitable: equity trading on-chain, atomic settlement, the line between 'crypto' assets and 'traditional' assets will completely disappear. Welcome to the 21st century..."

Of course, some see it as an opportunity, while others see it as a threat.

Con View: Exchanges Reap the Benefits, the Suffering Falls on the New Generation of Young People

Unlike the industry view that the NYSE's move will stimulate the crypto market and promote cryptocurrency popularization, some industry insiders also see potential problems.

L1D partner LouisT posted: "The entire global financial system is moving on-chain, but somehow, they don't seem to be bidding for our 'bear drug-like' tokens." In other words, traditional financial markets are not buying into the so-called RWA assets of cryptocurrencies.

MoonRock Capital founder expressed concern about the living conditions of the younger generation: "This is not good news for the baby boomer generation, your life has become more difficult." He probably means that compared to previous generations with more increments, the baby boomer generation faces a more complex investment environment and a round-the-clock "liquidity game stage."

BingX advisor Nebraskangooner also raised his doubts: "Why make the stock market trade 24 hours a day? No one wants this except the exchanges. The only benefit is that without the interference of after-hours trading, stop-loss and take-profit points can truly function. Not sure what impact this will have on stock price movements after earnings reports?" This view focuses more on information impact and exchange profits.

Summary: There Is Still a Gap Between Traditional Finance and Crypto-Native Groups, Opportunities for Users and Entrepreneurs Remain

Finally, I would like to briefly share my personal views based on the above information:

First, based on current information, the NYSE's relevant application may be approved as early as the end of 2026, and the main approval agency is still the U.S. SEC. For crypto platforms, this is an important time gap.

Second, the main service targets of the NYSE's tokenized stock trading and on-chain settlement platform are likely still conventional investment institutions and compliant investors. For crypto-native groups and even global investors, what they need is not only the satisfaction of functional needs but also the realization of "KYC-free registration trading, global asset liquidity allocation, and riskier high-leverage" through tokenized stocks and RWA platforms. This may be the advantage of crypto RWA projects.

Finally, the core purpose of the NYSE, Nasdaq, etc., in promoting stock tokenization is still trading volume and fees. Like CEXs constantly listing new token projects, in the short term, they may still need to learn from CEXs, DEXs, and even on-chain Perp DEXs. This is also the basis for existing mature platforms to counterattack. By then, it is not impossible for U.S. stock exchanges like the NYSE and Nasdaq to fall from grace. The key still lies in where the liquidity is, where the attention is, and where the user base is.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) planning to launch according to the article?

AThe NYSE is planning to launch a tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform that supports 7*24 hour trading, fractional shares, stablecoin-based fund settlement, and instant settlement for U.S. stocks and ETF funds.

QHow does the NYSE's tokenized stock trading plan differ from Nasdaq's application submitted last September?

AUnlike Nasdaq's application, which was seen as a regulatory response, the NYSE's plan is a comprehensive 'on-chain solution' that integrates its existing matching engine with a blockchain settlement system and includes partnerships with banking giants for tokenized deposits and clearing infrastructure.

QWhat potential negative impact does the article suggest this move could have on the cryptocurrency market?

AThe article suggests that the NYSE's entry into tokenized trading could severely challenge existing crypto RWA (Real World Asset) projects, as the NYSE's massive liquidity and asset scale might make crypto RWA projects seem insignificant by comparison.

QWhat is one major historical change in trading hours that the NYSE's new plan would represent?

AThe NYSE's plan to enable 7*24 hour trading would end the traditional limited trading hours model, which has been in place for decades, with the current 9:30 AM to 4:00 PM trading session lasting about 41 years.

QAccording to the article, what might be a key advantage that crypto-native RWA platforms still hold over traditional exchanges like the NYSE?

ACrypto-native RWA platforms may still hold advantages such as enabling global trading without KYC requirements, facilitating cross-border liquidity allocation, and offering higher leverage options, which appeal to crypto-native and global investors.

Пов'язані матеріали

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit13 год тому

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit13 год тому

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit14 год тому

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit14 год тому

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit15 год тому

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit15 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片