New Capital Incentive Pathways Under the New System: The True Picture of Crypto Investment and Financing in 2025

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-01-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-05

Анотація

"New Capital Incentive Paths Under New Regulations: The True Picture of Crypto Investment and Financing in 2025" In 2025, the cryptocurrency market achieved substantial regulatory breakthroughs, moving away from its wild growth phase and aligning more closely with mainstream finance. The global crypto market cap reached $3.2 trillion, while stablecoin transaction volumes surpassed $50 trillion, exceeding those of traditional payment giants like Visa and PayPal. This growth was underpinned by two key legislative developments: the enactment of stablecoin legislation, which provided clear legal frameworks for issuers and reserves, and the advancement of a crypto market structure bill, which established a classified regulatory approach. Despite these improvements, the secondary market remained volatile, with Bitcoin experiencing sharp price swings and altcoins performing weakly. In contrast, the primary market displayed a "cautiously active" stance, characterized by a significant shift in investment patterns. A review of the past four years shows a notable decoupling between funding rounds and amounts. In 2024, the number of financing events increased, but the total amount raised remained restrained. By 2025, this trend reversed: the number of deals declined significantly, but the total capital raised increased, with quarterly financing ranging between $3.7 billion and $5.1 billion. This indicates that investors are concentrating their bets on fewer, high-potential projects. ...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Ding Dang (@XiaMiPP)

2025 is a year of substantial breakthroughs at the institutional level for the cryptocurrency market, and a year of gradual departure from wild growth and convergence towards the mainstream financial system. In terms of scale, the total global crypto asset market capitalization has reached $3.2 trillion, while stablecoin trading volume has exceeded $50 trillion—a figure far surpassing traditional payment giants like Visa and PayPal. Behind these numbers lies the support of two core legislative advancements.

First, stablecoin-related legislation has been formally enacted. The bill clarifies the issuing entities, reserve requirements, and regulatory mechanisms, providing a clear legal status for "on-chain dollars." This not only reduces policy uncertainty for stablecoin businesses but also directly stimulates investment and financing activity in stablecoin, payment, and settlement-related sectors. Second, the cryptocurrency market structure bill is steadily progressing, incorporating crypto assets into a classified regulatory framework to avoid a "one-size-fits-all" approach, providing project teams and investors with a predictable compliance path.

The combination of these two legislative advancements will, to some extent, reshape the primary market's assessment of risk and return.

However, in contrast to the improved institutional environment, the secondary market in 2025 did not respond with strong performance. Bitcoin prices fluctuated sharply, and altcoins performed weakly. Against this backdrop, the primary market did not exhibit the widespread frenzy seen in the previous bull market but instead showed a cautiously active态势, with明显的 changes in financing节奏 and preferences.

Four-Year "Cycle" Review: Two Instances of Divergence in Financing Count and Amount

Reviewing the trends in crypto financing over the past four years, the evolution of the relationship between the primary market and secondary market performance becomes clear.

Early 2022 still benefited from the residual heat of the bull market, with both the number of financing events and the amounts raised remaining high; subsequently, as Bitcoin entered a downward cycle, financing activity gradually萎缩. Between 2022 and 2023, investment and financing activities were highly correlated with price movements, remaining overall低迷 under bear market pressure.

2024 became a significant turning point, marking the first divergence between the amount raised and the number of deals.

This year, with the restart of the Bitcoin halving narrative, the number of financing events明显回暖, but the amount raised remained consistently克制. Quarterly financing规模 hovered in the range of $1.8 billion to $2.8 billion, even similar to levels during the bear market. The main reason was that during this period, the crypto market行情 was dominated by Bitcoin and the Meme sector, which stood in stark contrast to the performance of the previous cycle. In the previous cycle, VC-backed projects were often the core of market hotspots, whereas in 2024, VC projects overall performed低迷, struggling to substantially impact the market, which to some extent also抑制了大额融资的出现.

Entering 2025, the divergence phenomenon reappeared, but this time the direction reversed.

The number of financings saw a significant decline, but the amount raised began to回升. Quarterly financing规模 returned to the range of $3.7 billion to $5.1 billion. This means that the average financing size increased significantly; investors are actively reducing the number of investments and instead concentrating their bets on a few projects deemed to have certainty and scalability.

12 Sectors, $178.9 Billion: Structural Changes in the Primary Market

According to incomplete statistics from Odaily Planet Daily, the total primary market investment and financing in 2025 reached $178.9 billion, with a total of 569 financing events. To more accurately depict changes in financing preferences, we have categorized all disclosed financing projects (the actual close time is often earlier than the announcement) into 12 sectors based on business type, target audience, and business model dimensions. These include: CeFi, Infrastructure, RWA, AI, DeFi, SocialFi, Prediction Markets, PayFi, DePIN, BTCFi, L1, and GameFi.

Looking at the financing situation in细分 sectors:

  • CeFi and Infrastructure ranked at the top in terms of both financing amount and number of deals. Underlying capabilities such as trading, custody, clearing, security, and cross-chain remain key areas for continuous capital investment. The market consensus on "infrastructure first" has not wavered.
  • DeFi projects continue to maintain high activity levels. The market still has high demand for innovation in new DeFi protocols, especially as the success of Hyperliquid directly demonstrated to the market that decentralized exchanges can also effectively handle large-scale capital inflows. Perp DEX has become a new financing hotspot.
  • AI and RWA have become new narrative pillars. The former aligns with the main theme of the global tech cycle, while the latter directly benefits from the institutional红利 of tokenizing traditional financial assets. Both paths share a common characteristic: their growth logic no longer relies entirely on the crypto-native market but extends into the broader tech and traditional financial systems.
  • The real dark horse is the Prediction Market sector. Although the number of projects in this sector is not particularly突出 compared to others, the amount raised jumped to become the second-largest sector,仅次于 infrastructure. This indicates that capital is being高度集中地押注 on a few leading projects.
  • In contrast, once-hot sectors like DePIN and GameFi, while still seeing many projects emerge, have experienced a sharp decline in financing appeal, as capital shifts towards areas with greater certainty and economies of scale.

Overall, the primary market is shifting from "casting a wide net" to "intensive cultivation."

Polymarket: Consensus Changes Behind the Top Financing of 2025

From the list of Top 10 financing amounts in 2025, it can be seen that Polymarket and Kalshi almost constitute the entire narrative of 2025 financing.

Among them, Polymarket has completed nearly $2.5 billion in multiple rounds of financing, with investors including知名加密风投 funds like Polychain, Dragonfly, and Coinbase; Kalshi began to gain momentum in 2025, completing approximately $1.5 billion in financing, supported by Paradigm, a16z, and Coinbase. Unlike Polymarket, Kalshi emphasizes compliance with federal regulation. However, what they share is that prediction markets are being viewed as a financial form with real demand and have now become the most vibrant and positively trending sector.

In the L1 sector, capital preferences similarly persist. On the list, besides the established public chain Ripple, others like Tempo and Mond are new-generation projects. Among them, Mond has already issued tokens, while Tempo has not. This reflects investors' continued investment in underlying infrastructure, with high-performance L1s still seen as the long-term cornerstone for ecosystem expansion.

Conclusion

Overall, the primary market in 2025 did not cool down but is undergoing active convergence and restructuring.

Capital is still flowing, but it is no longer chasing quantity; instead, it is being allocated集中 around certainty, compliance, and scalability potential. This change does not necessarily mean fewer opportunities but may instead signal that the crypto market is entering a more rational and mature stage.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat were the two key legislative developments that supported the growth of the cryptocurrency market in 2025?

AThe two key legislative developments were the formal enactment of the stablecoin-related bill, which provided a clear legal framework for 'on-chain dollars,' and the steady advancement of the cryptocurrency market structure bill, which incorporated crypto assets into a classified regulatory framework.

QHow did the trend of financing events and amounts change from 2024 to 2025?

AIn 2024, there was a first divergence where the number of financing events increased significantly, but the total amount raised remained restrained. In 2025, a second divergence occurred in the opposite direction: the number of financing events dropped significantly, but the total amount of financing increased, indicating a rise in the average deal size as investors concentrated their bets on fewer projects.

QWhich two sectors emerged as new narrative focal points in the 2025 crypto funding landscape, and what was their common characteristic?

AAI and RWA (Real World Assets) emerged as new narrative focal points. Their common characteristic was that their growth logic no longer relied entirely on the crypto-native market but extended into the broader technology and traditional financial systems.

QWhich sector, despite having a relatively low number of projects, saw a massive concentration of funding, becoming the second-largest sector by amount raised?

AThe prediction market sector, with projects like Polymarket and Kalshi, saw a massive concentration of funding, making it the second-largest sector by amount raised, just behind infrastructure.

QWhat overall shift in investment strategy does the 2025 crypto venture capital market represent?

AThe market shifted from a 'wide net' strategy of numerous small bets to a 'precision cultivation' strategy, where capital is concentrated and allocated around projects with regulatory clarity, certainty, and potential for scale, indicating a move towards a more rational and mature stage.

Пов'язані матеріали

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit25 хв тому

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit25 хв тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 год тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片