MYX climbs 11% after weeks of silence — Can bulls defend THIS zone?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-12

Анотація

MYX Finance (MYX) surged 11% in 24 hours, breaking above the key $4 resistance level after weeks of consolidation. Technical indicators, including Bull Bear Power and Stochastic RSI, suggest strengthening bullish momentum. Holding above $4 could propel the price retest of the $9 resistance zone. The DEX has shown resilience with over $1.92 billion in weekly perpetual trading volume, primarily on BSC, and its Total Value Locked (TVL) rebounded to $33 million. However, holder data reveals a divergence: spot holders declined while derivative holders increased significantly, indicating traders favor leveraged exposure over long-term holding. Sustained upward momentum depends on volume follow-through and whether spot demand can match the leveraged activity. The current structure favors buyers, but the imbalance between spot and derivative holders remains a key variable for future price sustainability.

Decentralized exchange (DEX) tokens seemed to be far away from the strength seen in them as the year 2025 came to a close.

As of press time, the MYX Finance token was among the few DEX tokens posting double-digit daily gains. CoinMarketCap data showed MYX up roughly 11% over 24 hours, raising questions about sustainability.

Can MYX hold the breakout?

MYX Finance [MYX] traded above a key breakout level near $4 after weeks of sideways consolidation since the 11th of October. Price action showed an extended balance as buyers and sellers contested control.

The altcoin remained range-bound between roughly $4.67 and $6, reflecting indecision rather than trend continuation.

Momentum indicators leaned constructive. Bull Bear Power printed 1.236, signaling gradually strengthening buying pressure.

At the same time, Stochastic RSI moved into oversold territory and showed a bullish crossover.

That shift set up a potential directional move.

If MYX held above the $4 breakout zone, price could revisit the $9 region, which previously marked a triple-top neckline. A sustained breakdown would invalidate the setup.

Perps volume, TVL on rebound

In terms of perpetual trading volume, the DEX has continued to show resilience since September. Its previous week’s perps volume was in excess of $1.92 billion, while the current one already had more than $277 million.

Most of this volume was traded on BNB Smart Chain (BSC), which is about $1.88 billion, while the rest was shared between Linea and Arbitrum One (ARB) chains.

Furthermore, its Total Value Locked (TVL) was rebounding after forming a bottom at $27 million in December. In the new year, this reading jumped by $6 million, to about $33 million at press time.

The figure showed growth, but still confirmed that the narrative was yet to become a force in the cryptocurrency sector. This is because the TVL’s magnitude paled in comparison to other sectors within DeFi.

Spot vs. Derivative holders

Holder data revealed a clear divergence.

Token Terminal data showed spot holders fell to 56.8K from a peak near 71.2K. MYX ranked ninth among DEX tokens by holder count.

By contrast, Derivative exchange holders climbed above 1.6 million from roughly 1.5 million over the same period. That imbalance suggested traders favored leveraged exposure over long-term Spot holding.

In the short term, structure favored buyers as long as MYX stayed above $4. Reclaiming the neckline zone could reopen upside toward higher resistance levels.

Even so, sustained momentum depended on volume follow-through rather than technical signals alone.


Final Thoughts

  • MYX’s structure stayed constructive, but participation patterns revealed where conviction truly sat.
  • If leverage continues to lead without spot follow-through, momentum may remain fragile. That imbalance is now the key variable to watch.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the daily percentage gain of MYX Finance token as of press time, according to CoinMarketCap data?

AMYX was up roughly 11% over 24 hours.

QBetween what two price levels did MYX remain range-bound, reflecting market indecision?

AMYX remained range-bound between roughly $4.67 and $6.

QWhat key price level must MYX hold above for the price to potentially revisit the $9 region?

AMYX must hold above the $4 breakout zone.

QOn which blockchain was the majority of MYX's perpetual trading volume traded?

AThe majority of the volume, about $1.88 billion, was traded on BNB Smart Chain (BSC).

QWhat does the data from Token Terminal reveal about the trend of Spot holders versus Derivative holders?

ASpot holders decreased to 56.8K from a peak near 71.2K, while Derivative holders climbed above 1.6 million from roughly 1.5 million, showing traders favored leveraged exposure.

Пов'язані матеріали

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit28 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit28 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手35 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手35 хв тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 год тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片