Musk Creates Another Capital Myth? SpaceX IPO Approaches, Stock Volatility May Be More Intense Than Tesla

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-04

Анотація

SpaceX, the aerospace giant founded by Elon Musk, is reportedly preparing for a potential IPO as early as this month, with a target valuation exceeding $1.75 trillion. Analysts predict the stock could experience even greater volatility than Tesla (TSLA.O) post-listing. Key growth is expected from its Starlink satellite internet business, projected to generate significant future revenue and profits. However, the company faces challenges typical of Musk-led ventures, including ambitious timelines that often face delays, such as the Starship rocket and Mars mission goals. The stock’s performance is likely to be heavily influenced by Musk’s leadership and public persona, with a low public float of around 3.3% potentially amplifying price swings. Negative news affecting Tesla or Musk could also impact SpaceX, highlighting concentrated risk. Despite delays, investor focus remains on long-term vision over short-term setbacks.

Source: Jinshi Data

Over the past few years, as SpaceX has gradually transformed into a giant in the aerospace field, market interest in it has grown exponentially. However, investors should expect that after its public listing, the stock price may experience significant volatility.

According to Bloomberg, SpaceX may file a confidential IPO application as early as this month, seeking a valuation of over $1.75 trillion. The company plans to conduct the IPO in June, potentially coinciding with Musk's birthday or a rare planetary alignment event. Headquartered in Starbase, Texas, USA, SpaceX, after absorbing Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI, is estimated to be valued at approximately $1.25 trillion.

PitchBook analyst Franco Granda wrote in a report on Tuesday that the stock performance of SpaceX after its listing would resemble that of Tesla (TSLA.O) but "with even greater volatility."

Future Growth Expectations: Starlink to Contribute Major Revenue

PitchBook predicts that by 2040, SpaceX's revenue will reach $150 billion, with adjusted profits of $95 billion.

In comparison, the company's revenue last year was approximately $16 billion at most, with profits around $8 billion. About $42 billion in annual revenue in the future may come from the Starlink satellite internet business, which currently contributes the majority of SpaceX's cash flow.

This forecast does not include the xAI business. xAI is currently burning cash rapidly but may secure more projects from the U.S. Department of Defense in the future. The forecast also assumes that Tesla and SpaceX will not merge, although Musk and some analysts have suggested this possibility in the past.

Musk wrote on the X platform in November last year: "My companies, somewhat surprisingly, are moving in the direction of integration."

Musk Effect: Vision-Driven but Timelines Often Delayed

Granda stated that many lessons investors learned from Tesla may also apply to SpaceX. For example, both companies are influenced by Musk's famous public optimism.

Granda cited an example where Tesla promised to produce 5,000 cars per week by the end of 2017 but subsequently fell into "production hell" and failed to meet the target. However, when the company finally achieved this milestone in mid-2018, its stock price surged significantly.

SpaceX has also experienced similar delays. The development of its Starship super rocket has faced multiple setbacks, and other spacecraft projects in the company's history have had similar experiences. Musk once set 2022 as the "ideal target" for sending an unmanned mission to Mars, but by 2026, this mission is still years away from realization.

However, investors have gradually grown accustomed to Musk's timelines having a certain degree of "flexibility."

Therefore, when the December deadline for the autonomous taxi project passed, investors did not panic excessively. Later, when Musk achieved the set goal slightly later, the stock price rose accordingly. Granda refers to this phenomenon as the "credibility ledger," where investors automatically factor in delays but focus more on the overall vision.

This could be advantageous for SpaceX. The company recently delayed its Mars colonization plan while also applying to regulators to launch up to 1 million space data centers into orbit, a plan that relies on the progress of the Starship project. SpaceX has also stated plans to build a city on the moon.

Post-IPO Challenges: Higher Volatility and High Dependence on Musk

However, as a publicly listed company, SpaceX must achieve these goals while facing Wall Street investors and making continuous progress in the xAI and Starlink businesses. Therefore, market reactions could be very intense.

Granda predicts that if certain major events typically cause only a 10% to 15% fluctuation in Tesla's stock price, they could trigger a 20% to 30% fluctuation in SpaceX's stock. This is partly because SpaceX's publicly traded shares are expected to account for only about 3.3%.

SpaceX stock may also benefit from the so-called "Musk premium." Even as Tesla's core electric vehicle business declines, this premium has helped keep its stock price at a high level. However, this光环 also means that Musk's companies are highly dependent on him.

Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Andres Sheppard previously stated:

"Today, over 50% of shareholders would say that Tesla is Elon, and Elon is Tesla. Many people, perhaps even the majority, directly link Tesla's success to Elon's tenure."

Tesla also mentioned the company's dependence on Musk in its annual report, warning that if Musk is forced to sell some of his shares, the stock price could fall. SpaceX was founded by Musk over twenty years ago, and he currently holds about 44% of the company's shares. Its dependence on the CEO is likely similarly high.

Granda stated that negative news from Tesla would likely put pressure on SpaceX's stock price, and vice versa. At the same time, Musk's political stance has also sparked controversy and affected Tesla's sales. Granda concluded:

"The combination of lower float, earlier-stage technology, and highly concentrated Musk exposure means its volatility could exceed the already significant volatility pattern seen in Tesla's history."

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the expected valuation of SpaceX for its upcoming listing, and how does it compare to its previous valuation after absorbing xAI?

ASpaceX is seeking a valuation of over $1.75 trillion for its IPO, which is significantly higher than its previous valuation of approximately $1.25 trillion after absorbing Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI.

QAccording to PitchBook analyst Franco Granda, how will SpaceX's stock performance compare to Tesla's after it goes public?

APitchBook analyst Franco Granda stated that SpaceX's stock performance after its public listing is expected to be similar to Tesla's stock but with even stronger volatility.

QWhat is the primary source of cash flow for SpaceX currently, and what is its projected contribution to future revenue by 2040?

AThe Starlink satellite internet business is currently the primary source of cash flow for SpaceX. It is projected to contribute approximately $42 billion in annual revenue by 2040.

QWhat phenomenon does the analyst refer to as the 'credibility ledger' in the context of Elon Musk's companies?

AThe 'credibility ledger' refers to the phenomenon where investors automatically factor in delays to Elon Musk's ambitious timelines but remain focused on the overall vision, leading to stock price increases when the goals are eventually met, even if later than initially promised.

QWhat are the key factors cited by the analyst that could lead to SpaceX's stock having higher volatility than Tesla's?

AThe key factors leading to potentially higher volatility for SpaceX's stock are: a lower public float of only about 3.3%, the earlier stage of its core technology, and a highly concentrated exposure to 'Key Man Risk' associated with Elon Musk himself.

Пов'язані матеріали

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit4 хв тому

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit4 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit12 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit12 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报22 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报22 хв тому

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit29 хв тому

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit29 хв тому

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbit1 год тому

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片