Monero Gains Momentum After Recent Sell-Off, Faces Resistance at $363

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-11

Анотація

Monero (XMR) is showing signs of stabilization around $340.26 after a sharp sell-off from its January highs near $790. The cryptocurrency is currently consolidating within a range of $320 to $350. Despite the recent rebound from intra-week lows, the overall trend remains bearish, with XMR trading below key moving averages including the 200-day SMA at $363.14, which now acts as a major resistance level. Immediate support is found near the 7-day SMA at $326.43. The RSI indicates oversold conditions but suggests a potential short-term recovery. If support fails, XMR could retest the $270 level.

Monero (XMR), the privacy‐focused cryptocurrency, showing signs of stabilization on the daily chart after a significant sell-off from its January highs near $790. As of today, XMR trades around $340.26, consolidating in the $320 to $350 range following a sharp downtrend over the past week.

After being triggered by a technical break‐and‐fail pattern, the current pattern reflects a rebound from recent intra‐week lows. This move follows a surge earlier in the year and subsequent correction.

Monero Shows Bearish Trend, Key Levels in Focus

Technical indicators from Binance’s daily chart highlight a predominantly bearish trend. The XMR price remains below critical moving averages, including the 30-day SMA at $470.47, 50-day SMA at $464.86, 100-day SMA at $431.80, and 200-day SMA at $363.14. However, it is holding just above the short-term 7-day SMA at $326.43, which currently provides immediate support.

Zooming in, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) shows that momentum is still oversold, with a reading near -20.27, but recent RSI movements suggest a slight easing of bearish pressure, indicating a possible short-term recovery or consolidation phase.

If XMR continues the uptrend the Key resistance lies at the 200-day SMA around $363, with stronger resistance expected between $430 and $470, where it failed to boost the bull earlier. A break above these levels would be necessary to signal a sustained reversal from the current bearish trend.

If the price fails to maintain support near the 7-day SMA, it may retest recent lows near $270, marking another critical support zone.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Ethereum Slips Toward $1,900 as Selling Pressure Intensifies

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the current trading price of Monero (XMR) and what range has it been consolidating in?

AMonero is currently trading around $340.26 and has been consolidating in the $320 to $350 range.

QWhat is the key resistance level that Monero is facing according to the 200-day SMA?

AThe key resistance level is at the 200-day Simple Moving Average (SMA), which is around $363.

QWhat does the Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading near -20.27 indicate about Monero's momentum?

AThe RSI reading near -20.27 indicates that the momentum is still oversold, but recent movements suggest a slight easing of bearish pressure, pointing to a possible short-term recovery or consolidation.

QWhat could happen if Monero fails to maintain support near its 7-day SMA?

AIf Monero fails to maintain support near the 7-day SMA at $326.43, it may retest recent lows near $270, which is another critical support zone.

QBetween which price levels is stronger resistance expected for Monero, according to the article?

AStronger resistance is expected between $430 and $470, where it previously failed to boost the bull run.

Пов'язані матеріали

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit8 хв тому

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit8 хв тому

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit26 хв тому

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit26 хв тому

White House Crypto Advisor Fires Back At Bank CEOs In Stablecoin Rewards Clash

As a key crypto market structure bill nears a markup, the White House's top crypto advisor has criticized bank CEOs for reigniting a debate over stablecoin rewards. This follows a letter from American Bankers Association CEO Rob Nichols urging bank executives to pressure lawmakers to revise the CLARITY Act, claiming its current language inadequately prevents crypto firms from offering "interest-like rewards" on payment stablecoins, which could risk bank deposits and financial stability. The bill prohibits interest-equivalent payments but allows rewards for specific activities like staking. Patrick Witt, a White House digital assets advisor, rebuked the banking CEOs for refusing to attend White House mediation meetings on this issue, which has delayed the bill for months. While Senate sources suggest the banking lobby's push is weak and the committee is focused on other bill aspects, the debate could resurface when the legislation reaches the full Senate.

bitcoinist1 год тому

White House Crypto Advisor Fires Back At Bank CEOs In Stablecoin Rewards Clash

bitcoinist1 год тому

Here Are The Major Bitcoin Levels To Watch After Breaking $80,000

Bitcoin has closed a week above $80,000 for the first time since late January, strengthening the bullish case after breaking through the $78,000 to $80,000 bearish order block. The key to future price action now depends on whether bulls can hold two critical levels. The first is the $78,000 floor, which must be defended to confirm the former resistance zone has turned into support. The second is the $82,000 lower-high area; a clean break above it could open the path toward the next major resistance at $90,000. However, a truly bullish trend shift would only be confirmed with a high-timeframe close above the $97,900 "Change of Character" level, which would break the pattern of lower highs formed since late 2025. While currently trading around $81,000, analysis suggests there remains a significant chance Bitcoin retests the $60,000 zone before any sustained upward move.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Here Are The Major Bitcoin Levels To Watch After Breaking $80,000

bitcoinist1 год тому

Zcash Is Up 1,500% And Its Biggest Backer Says This Is Why

Zcash (ZEC) has surged approximately 1,500%, a rally attributed by prominent backer Josh Swihart to fundamental resets in governance, product strategy, narrative, and organization. Three years ago, Zcash had strong cryptography but weak momentum. Today, shielded transaction adoption has risen dramatically, and over $3 billion in value is held in shielded wallets. Key changes include a governance reset where direct funding to core institutions ended, breaking a perceived "stranglehold" and empowering the broader community. Product focus shifted to user adoption, exemplified by the Zodl wallet, which contributed to shielded supply rising from 11% to about 30%. The narrative moved from "privacy coin" to "unstoppable private money," improving institutional perception and leading to listings and investment. Organizationally, key developers formed the Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL), raising $25 million to scale adoption. Current priorities are improving user experience, scalability (targeting faster block times), and post-quantum security. Swihart concluded these compounded efforts explain Zcash's accelerated growth.

bitcoinist2 год тому

Zcash Is Up 1,500% And Its Biggest Backer Says This Is Why

bitcoinist2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси