Models Can Also "Nest"? MiniMax Releases M2.7: The First Domestic Large Model Deeply Involved in Self-Iteration

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-18Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-18

Анотація

Artificial intelligence is evolving from monthly updates to self-evolution. On March 18, MiniMax released its first new model version deeply involved in its own iteration—MiniMax M2.7. This marks a new stage in model development: large models are no longer solely trained by human programmers but have begun to "train themselves." The core breakthrough of MiniMax M2.7 lies in its strong autonomous construction capability. It can independently build complex Agent Harness (intelligent agent testing frameworks) and, relying on underlying capabilities such as Agent Teams, complex Skills, and Tool Search tools, complete highly complex productivity tasks autonomously. In simple terms, M2.7 is not just a smarter conversational agent but also a "digital engineer" capable of self-diagnosis and self-optimization. This "self-participatory iteration" model will significantly enhance the model’s logical reasoning and tool invocation accuracy when facing unknown complex tasks. Currently, this self-evolving MiniMax M2.7 model has been fully launched on the MiniMax Agent platform and open platform. As large models begin to deeply participate in their own "growth" process, the ceiling of AI may be raised once again.

The evolution speed of artificial intelligence is transitioning from "monthly updates" to "self-evolution." On March 18, MiniMax officially released its first new version model deeply involved in iterating itself—MiniMax M2.7. This marks a new stage in model development: large models are no longer solely fed by human programmers but have begun to learn to "guide themselves."

According to reports, the core breakthrough of MiniMax M2.7 lies in its powerful autonomous construction capability. It can independently build complex Agent Harness (intelligent agent testing frameworks) and, relying on underlying capabilities such as Agent Teams (intelligent agent collaboration), complex Skills, and Tool Search tool, independently complete highly complex productivity tasks.

Simply put, M2.7 is not just a smarter conversationalist but also a "digital engineer" capable of self-diagnosis and self-optimization. This "self-participatory iteration" model will significantly enhance the model's logical reasoning limits and tool invocation accuracy when facing unknown complex tasks.

Currently, this MiniMax M2.7 model, equipped with self-evolution genes, has been fully launched on the MiniMax Agent platform and open platform. As large models begin to deeply participate in their own "growth" process, the ceiling of AI may be raised once again.

Meanwhile, the AI computing power and application market are also seeing frequent developments. LuChen Technology announced the completion of a Series B financing round worth hundreds of millions of yuan, with its overseas revenue share soaring to 79%; meanwhile, due to a surge in call volumes, some of Alibaba Cloud's AI computing power products have reportedly seen price increases. Amid the interplay of technological iteration and market fluctuations, the AI track in 2026 is becoming increasingly urgent and full of variables.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name of the new model released by MiniMax that is capable of deep self-iteration?

AThe new model is called MiniMax M2.7.

QWhat is the core breakthrough of the MiniMax M2.7 model according to the article?

AIts core breakthrough is its strong autonomous construction capability, allowing it to build complex Agent Harness and complete highly complex productivity tasks independently.

QWhat specific abilities does the M2.7 model use to complete complex tasks?

AIt uses abilities such as Agent Teams (agent collaboration), complex Skills, and Tool Search tool to complete tasks.

QOn which platforms has the MiniMax M2.7 model been fully launched?

AIt has been fully launched on the MiniMax Agent platform and the open platform.

QBesides the MiniMax announcement, what other AI market dynamics are mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that LuChen Technology completed a Series B financing of hundreds of millions of yuan, and Alibaba Cloud increased prices for some AI computing products due to a surge in usage.

Пов'язані матеріали

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit19 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit19 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit34 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit34 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片