Meta on Trial in the U.S.: 29 States Accuse Company of Harming Children

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-20

Анотація

On August 18, 2026, a trial against Meta began in a federal court in Oakland, California. A coalition of 29 states, led by California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey, accuses the company of intentionally designing addictive features for Facebook and Instagram, concealing known risks to minors' mental health, and collecting data from children under 13 without parental consent. The lawsuit alleges violations of the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and state consumer protection laws. State prosecutors argue Meta exploited young users for profit, causing them physical and mental harm. Meta denies the allegations, stating a long-term commitment to youth safety and contesting direct links between social media use and declining teen well-being. The plaintiffs seek financial compensation and injunctions to force Meta to remove features like infinite scroll and visible likes, implement time limits for minors, and delete data of under-13 users. The bench trial, presided over by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, is expected to last 6–8 weeks. Testimony from former and current employees, including former staffer Arturo Béjar, has begun. The outcome could set a significant precedent for regulating how tech companies interact with minors and handle their data, potentially influencing future lawsuits against other platforms. The case reflects a broader regulatory shift, examining how algorithms and AI systems shape child behavior, not just platform content.

On August 18, 2026, hearings began in the Oakland court (Northern District of California) in the case against Meta* — the extremist company is accused of intentionally designing features of Facebook and Instagram that encouraged teenagers and children to overuse the platforms, concealing known risks to minors' mental health, and collecting personal data from children under 13 without parental consent. The lawsuit was filed by a coalition of 29 states, with California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey acting as lead plaintiffs. According to the plaintiffs, Meta's actions violate the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and state consumer protection laws.

Positions of the Parties

California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated on August 17: "Meta designed Facebook and Instagram to keep children on the platforms as long as possible — to the point of causing physical and mental harm. Exploiting the most vulnerable users for corporate profit is not only immoral but illegal." Similar statements were made by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman, and New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport.

In court filings, Meta indicated that the plaintiffs' calculations could theoretically lead to penalties of up to $1.4 trillion. Bonta clarified on August 18 that the states are not demanding this exact sum: "To be clear: we are not seeking $1.4 trillion." According to him, this is a maximum theoretical estimate based on the number of young platform users, and the actual amount of fines will be determined by the court.

Plaintiffs' Demands

In addition to compensation, the plaintiffs are seeking court injunctions, including:

  • removal of features that encourage prolonged platform use — such as infinite scroll, visible 'likes,' and recommendation algorithms;

  • implementation of usage time limits for minors;

  • deletion of data belonging to children under 13.

Meta's Position

The company denies the allegations. Meta states that the evidence will show its long-term commitment to supporting young users, and that research does not confirm a direct link between social media use and a decline in teen well-being.

Course of the Proceedings

The case is being presided over by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; the jury plays an advisory role, with the final decision resting with the judge. The trial is scheduled to last 6–8 weeks. Former company employee Arturo Béjar has already testified, speaking about Meta's internal culture and research on harm to teenagers. Testimony from Instagram head Adam Mosseri and other current and former company employees is expected; the question of calling Mark Zuckerberg to testify remains open.

The Oakland trial has become one of the largest proceedings against Meta concerning child protection on social media. The outcome will influence how technology companies structure their engagement with underage users and handle their data.

Judge Gonzalez Rogers' decision could set a precedent for similar lawsuits against other platforms, as COPPA and state consumer protection laws remain key tools for regulating the collection of children's data.

AI Opinion

Analysis shows that the case against Meta fits into a broader wave of legal claims against technology companies for their impact on minors' mental health. Concurrently with the Oakland proceedings, OpenAI recently released a separate version of ChatGPT for teenagers amidst lawsuits where plaintiffs link the deaths of minors to a lack of protective mechanisms in chatbots. This coincidence suggests that regulatory pressure is shifting from the question of "what social networks publish" to "how algorithms and AI systems shape a child's behavior" — the COPPA law, enacted in 1998 for static web pages, is being tested against generative and recommendation systems of a completely different scale.

The financial aspect of the case rarely makes headlines: even partial satisfaction of the claims could change the architecture of recommendation feeds not only at Meta but also at its competitors, who follow its product decisions. Will the liability of technology companies remain limited to social networks, or will the next wave of lawsuits target AI assistants and gaming platforms?

*Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, is recognized as an extremist organization and is banned in Russia.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the main accusations brought by the coalition of 29 US states against Meta in the lawsuit?

AThe lawsuit accuses Meta of intentionally designing features for Facebook and Instagram that encouraged excessive use by teens and children, concealing known risks to minors' mental health, and collecting personal data from children under 13 without parental consent. These actions allegedly violate the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and state consumer protection laws.

QWhat are the key injunctive relief demands that the coalition of states is seeking from the court?

AThe states are seeking court orders to require Meta to: 1) Remove features that encourage prolonged platform use, such as infinite scroll, visible 'likes,' and recommendation algorithms. 2) Introduce time usage limits for minors. 3) Delete data belonging to children under the age of 13.

QHow does Meta respond to the accusations in the lawsuit?

AMeta denies the allegations. The company states that the evidence will demonstrate its long-term commitment to supporting young users and claims that research does not confirm a direct link between social media use and a decline in adolescent well-being.

QWhat is the broader regulatory trend suggested by the analysis of this case against Meta?

AThe analysis suggests regulatory pressure is shifting from focusing on 'what social media companies publish' to 'how algorithms and AI systems shape children's behavior.' It questions whether laws like COPPA, enacted in 1998 for static web pages, are sufficient to regulate generative and recommender systems of a completely different scale.

QWhat potential industry-wide impact could the outcome of this trial have, according to the article's analysis?

AEven partial fulfillment of the lawsuit's demands could change the architecture of recommender feeds not only for Meta but also for its competitors, who often follow its product decisions. The analysis also questions if the next wave of lawsuits will extend beyond social media to target AI assistants and gaming platforms.

Пов'язані матеріали

Musk Awaits $50 Trillion: Is There a Limit to the U.S. National Debt and What Comes Next?

Elon Musk reacted to a projection of US national debt reaching $50 trillion by 2030, labeling it a "precise timeline" with a laughing emoji. The debt has recently passed the $40 trillion mark. Skeptics note that specific debt thresholds have been breached before without immediate collapse. However, analysts warn the focus should shift from the nominal debt amount to its affordability. A key metric is when the average interest rate on the debt exceeds the economy's growth rate, a point the US Congressional Budget Office projects for 2031. Once this "debt spiral" begins, interest costs grow self-reinforcing. Currently, interest payments have already surpassed defense spending, exceeding $1 trillion annually. Ray Dalio warns a debt crisis could occur within "three years, plus or minus two," advising portfolio diversification into gold and some Bitcoin. Potential outcomes if debt becomes unmanageable include: 1) Financial repression and monetization (the "Japanese path" of controlled yields and inflation), seen as the most likely; 2) Severe austerity (the "Greek path" of spending cuts/tax hikes), considered politically unlikely; or 3) Technical default/restructuring, which would cause global financial shock. The most probable path is a hybrid of moderate financial repression and gradual inflation, leading not to a sudden crash but to long-term economic stagnation and a declining standard of living. By 2056, debt could reach 175% of GDP. Ultimately, the limit for US debt is not a fixed number but a function of market confidence in the dollar.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Musk Awaits $50 Trillion: Is There a Limit to the U.S. National Debt and What Comes Next?

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Solana Developer Mert Mumtaz Highly Praises Altcoin!

In the world of cryptocurrencies and finance, where privacy is a major focus, significant developments are underway. Valor Group founder Dev and notable crypto ecosystem figure Mert Mumtaz participated in a program on The Rollup crypto broadcasting platform, discussing the latest developments for the Zcash (ZEC) network and its important future roadmap. The conversation covered network scalability, security updates, and measures taken against quantum threats. The recent Ironwood update implemented in the Zcash network is considered a crucial milestone for the project. During the event, Mert highlighted that internal security audits using 'red team' methods and AI identified a potential vulnerability in the Orchard pool that could have allowed the creation of counterfeit notes. Extensive work and formal verification proved the code mathematically perfect according to specifications. The seamless migration of funds from the Orchard pool to the new Ironwood pool has completely eliminated the risk of counterfeit coin creation in the network. Dev shared important technical details about Zcash's future vision, emphasizing that Valor Group's main goal is for Zcash to achieve transaction volumes comparable to credit cards. He stated they aim to process over 50,000 transactions per second with sub-second latency while maintaining the full proof-of-work mechanism. The main scaling bottleneck was identified not as the nodes themselves, but wallet scanning processes. A new wallet architecture and synchronization delay optimization are expected to resolve this issue. The upcoming Tachion update promises to provide complete protection for Zcash against quantum computing threats. This update will integrate recursive zero-knowledge proofs into the network. It is reported to reduce transaction sizes by more than five times, eliminate node data processing overhead, and address state growth issues. With Tachion, the network is claimed to achieve not just 'quantum-resilient' but a truly 'quantum-secure' privacy structure.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Solana Developer Mert Mumtaz Highly Praises Altcoin!

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片