Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Liquidation Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Despite Rebound

MatrixportОпубліковано о 2026-02-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-27

Анотація

Based on Matrixport's research, Bitcoin's recent breakdown below a key support level, as indicated in the October 31, 2025, report, has confirmed a bearish trend. The magnitude and rhythm of this pullback are comparable to previous bear market phases. The market focus has shifted from debating a potential trend reversal to anticipating the next optimal window for asset allocation. The analysis, utilizing a cyclical framework, identifies that Bitcoin likely entered a confirmed bear market phase after multiple characteristics of a late fifth bull cycle emerged and key support level was lost. A critical development was Bitcoin's break below its one-year moving average in November 2025, a historical signal often marking the start of a bear market that typically lasts around 12 months. This projects the next potential bull cycle to begin in Q4 2026, with a cyclical low possibly arriving earlier in Q3 2026. The report posits that Bitcoin's "four-year cycle" is less driven by halving events and is more likely synchronized with the rhythm of U.S. mid-term election cycles, which bring regulatory and political uncertainty that better explains the timing of market tops and bottoms. From a technical perspective, key monthly indicators have not yet reached crucial oversold thresholds that have historically signaled a market bottom. The monthly Stochastic oscillator, which often completed its bottoming process after falling below 15%, currently sits at approximately 39%. Similarly, the ...

"Key thresholds not yet breached, reversal signals absent—true allocation window still awaits confirmation"

Recently, Bitcoin's price broke below the critical level indicated in the October 31, 2025 report, confirming the downward trend. From a historical cycle perspective, the magnitude and rhythm of this pullback are highly similar to past bear market phases. Market focus has consequently shifted from "whether the trend is reversing" to "when the next worthwhile allocation window will arrive."

Looking back at this cycle, we identified the bull market starting point on October 28, 2022, based on our cycle framework, and projected that the cycle peak would reach or touch $125,000 around July 6, 2023. From late 2024 to around October 2025, Bitcoin has repeatedly exhibited characteristics typical of the final stages of its fifth bull market; with the loss of key support levels, the market has formally entered a confirmed bear phase.

Against this backdrop, we have combined the one-year moving average, monthly stochastic indicator (Stochastics), monthly RSI, and other quantitative models to assess the corresponding time and price ranges of potential low zones. This is to determine whether the downside risks have been largely cleared and whether the market is beginning to accumulate conditions for a shift from weak to strong.

After Breaking the One-Year Moving Average, the Cycle Framework Points to 2026

In November 2025, Bitcoin broke below its one-year moving average. Historical experience shows that this signal often corresponds to the start of a bear market, and past bear market phases have typically lasted about 12 months. By this推算, the next bull market could start in the fourth quarter of 2026, with the cycle low more likely occurring in the third quarter of 2026.

From a more macro perspective, we believe Bitcoin's "four-year cycle" is not primarily driven by the block reward halving but is more likely synchronized with the rhythm of the US mid-term election cycle. Historical data shows that the mid-term election cycles of 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022, and the upcoming 2026 have all coincided with major bear market phases. Compared to the halving mechanism, the regulatory and political uncertainty波动 brought by mid-term elections better explains the timing distribution of Bitcoin's cycle tops and bottoms.

Technical Indicators Have Not Yet Touched Key Thresholds, Confirming a Bottom Still Requires Waiting for "Reversal Confirmation"

On the technical front, the monthly stochastic indicator (Stochastics) in the last five cycles often completed its bottoming after falling below the 15% "deep oversold" zone, followed by an upward reversal within 1-3 months, signaling the end of the bear market. Currently, this indicator is around 39%, yet to touch the key threshold.

Similarly, the monthly RSI in historical cycles usually formed a key support band around the 48 level. True bottom signals often emerged during the "break below key level followed by a rebound" reversal confirmation stage. The current RSI is around the 50 level; although it is接近 the key zone, a clear "breakdown and rebound" structure has not yet appeared.

Both core indicators have not given clear bottom confirmation: the market has not yet shown the reversal confirmation corresponding to the "final concentrated liquidation."

Overall, the final low of this bear market may not yet have appeared. Historical experience shows that Bitcoin more often completes its bottoming during phases of low trading volume bias, gradual retreat of selling pressure, and declining market participation. Rapid pullbacks accompanied by forced liquidations and falling prices resemble phased capitulation selling, rather than the cycle's final low.

Under the dual perspectives of the political cycle framework and technical indicator verification, we are more inclined to believe that the truly worthwhile recovery allocation window requires waiting for key monthly indicators to touch extreme zones and show reversal confirmation. The price is currently approaching the historical low对应 range, but reversal signals have not yet appeared. Patience is still required during the bear market尾声 phase. The prerequisite for orderly recovery allocation is confirming the exhaustion of downward momentum, not merely judging a trend reversal based on the price approaching lows.

The above views are from Matrix on Target. Contact us to obtain the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading may carry significant risks and instability. Investment decisions should be made after carefully considering personal circumstances and consulting financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided herein.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main argument of the Matrixport report regarding the current Bitcoin market?

AThe report argues that the recent price drop confirms a bear market, and while the price is approaching historical low ranges, the true reversal signal and the optimal window for re-entry have not yet appeared. Key technical indicators have not yet reached extreme oversold levels to confirm a bottom.

QAccording to the report, what historical event is the current Bitcoin cycle more closely aligned with, rather than the halving?

AThe report suggests Bitcoin's 'four-year cycle' is more likely synchronized with the U.S. mid-term election cycle, which brings regulatory and political uncertainty, rather than being primarily driven by the block reward halving mechanism.

QWhat is the predicted timeline for the next Bitcoin bull market based on the breakdown of the one-year moving average?

ABased on the historical pattern that bear markets typically last about 12 months after the one-year moving average is broken, the next bull market is projected to potentially start in Q4 2026, with the cycle low possibly occurring earlier in Q3 2026.

QWhat two key technical indicators does the report use to assess whether the market has bottomed, and what are their current readings?

AThe two key indicators are the monthly Stochastic oscillator (currently around 39%, not yet in the deep oversold zone below 15%) and the monthly RSI (currently around 50, close to but not yet breaking below its key support level of 48). Neither has given a clear 'breakdown then reversal' confirmation signal.

QWhat type of market environment does the report state is historically more conducive for forming a final bottom?

AHistorically, Bitcoin more often completes its bottoming process during a phase of low trading volume, gradual easing of selling pressure, and declining market participation, rather than during a volatile, high-volume sell-off driven by events like forced liquidations.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit6 хв тому

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit6 хв тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1 год тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1 год тому

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbit1 год тому

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片