Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Liquidation Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Despite Rebound

MatrixportОпубліковано о 2026-02-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-27

Анотація

Based on Matrixport's research, Bitcoin's recent breakdown below a key support level, as indicated in the October 31, 2025, report, has confirmed a bearish trend. The magnitude and rhythm of this pullback are comparable to previous bear market phases. The market focus has shifted from debating a potential trend reversal to anticipating the next optimal window for asset allocation. The analysis, utilizing a cyclical framework, identifies that Bitcoin likely entered a confirmed bear market phase after multiple characteristics of a late fifth bull cycle emerged and key support level was lost. A critical development was Bitcoin's break below its one-year moving average in November 2025, a historical signal often marking the start of a bear market that typically lasts around 12 months. This projects the next potential bull cycle to begin in Q4 2026, with a cyclical low possibly arriving earlier in Q3 2026. The report posits that Bitcoin's "four-year cycle" is less driven by halving events and is more likely synchronized with the rhythm of U.S. mid-term election cycles, which bring regulatory and political uncertainty that better explains the timing of market tops and bottoms. From a technical perspective, key monthly indicators have not yet reached crucial oversold thresholds that have historically signaled a market bottom. The monthly Stochastic oscillator, which often completed its bottoming process after falling below 15%, currently sits at approximately 39%. Similarly, the ...

"Key thresholds not yet breached, reversal signals absent—true allocation window still awaits confirmation"

Recently, Bitcoin's price broke below the critical level indicated in the October 31, 2025 report, confirming the downward trend. From a historical cycle perspective, the magnitude and rhythm of this pullback are highly similar to past bear market phases. Market focus has consequently shifted from "whether the trend is reversing" to "when the next worthwhile allocation window will arrive."

Looking back at this cycle, we identified the bull market starting point on October 28, 2022, based on our cycle framework, and projected that the cycle peak would reach or touch $125,000 around July 6, 2023. From late 2024 to around October 2025, Bitcoin has repeatedly exhibited characteristics typical of the final stages of its fifth bull market; with the loss of key support levels, the market has formally entered a confirmed bear phase.

Against this backdrop, we have combined the one-year moving average, monthly stochastic indicator (Stochastics), monthly RSI, and other quantitative models to assess the corresponding time and price ranges of potential low zones. This is to determine whether the downside risks have been largely cleared and whether the market is beginning to accumulate conditions for a shift from weak to strong.

After Breaking the One-Year Moving Average, the Cycle Framework Points to 2026

In November 2025, Bitcoin broke below its one-year moving average. Historical experience shows that this signal often corresponds to the start of a bear market, and past bear market phases have typically lasted about 12 months. By this推算, the next bull market could start in the fourth quarter of 2026, with the cycle low more likely occurring in the third quarter of 2026.

From a more macro perspective, we believe Bitcoin's "four-year cycle" is not primarily driven by the block reward halving but is more likely synchronized with the rhythm of the US mid-term election cycle. Historical data shows that the mid-term election cycles of 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022, and the upcoming 2026 have all coincided with major bear market phases. Compared to the halving mechanism, the regulatory and political uncertainty波动 brought by mid-term elections better explains the timing distribution of Bitcoin's cycle tops and bottoms.

Technical Indicators Have Not Yet Touched Key Thresholds, Confirming a Bottom Still Requires Waiting for "Reversal Confirmation"

On the technical front, the monthly stochastic indicator (Stochastics) in the last five cycles often completed its bottoming after falling below the 15% "deep oversold" zone, followed by an upward reversal within 1-3 months, signaling the end of the bear market. Currently, this indicator is around 39%, yet to touch the key threshold.

Similarly, the monthly RSI in historical cycles usually formed a key support band around the 48 level. True bottom signals often emerged during the "break below key level followed by a rebound" reversal confirmation stage. The current RSI is around the 50 level; although it is接近 the key zone, a clear "breakdown and rebound" structure has not yet appeared.

Both core indicators have not given clear bottom confirmation: the market has not yet shown the reversal confirmation corresponding to the "final concentrated liquidation."

Overall, the final low of this bear market may not yet have appeared. Historical experience shows that Bitcoin more often completes its bottoming during phases of low trading volume bias, gradual retreat of selling pressure, and declining market participation. Rapid pullbacks accompanied by forced liquidations and falling prices resemble phased capitulation selling, rather than the cycle's final low.

Under the dual perspectives of the political cycle framework and technical indicator verification, we are more inclined to believe that the truly worthwhile recovery allocation window requires waiting for key monthly indicators to touch extreme zones and show reversal confirmation. The price is currently approaching the historical low对应 range, but reversal signals have not yet appeared. Patience is still required during the bear market尾声 phase. The prerequisite for orderly recovery allocation is confirming the exhaustion of downward momentum, not merely judging a trend reversal based on the price approaching lows.

The above views are from Matrix on Target. Contact us to obtain the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading may carry significant risks and instability. Investment decisions should be made after carefully considering personal circumstances and consulting financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided herein.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main argument of the Matrixport report regarding the current Bitcoin market?

AThe report argues that the recent price drop confirms a bear market, and while the price is approaching historical low ranges, the true reversal signal and the optimal window for re-entry have not yet appeared. Key technical indicators have not yet reached extreme oversold levels to confirm a bottom.

QAccording to the report, what historical event is the current Bitcoin cycle more closely aligned with, rather than the halving?

AThe report suggests Bitcoin's 'four-year cycle' is more likely synchronized with the U.S. mid-term election cycle, which brings regulatory and political uncertainty, rather than being primarily driven by the block reward halving mechanism.

QWhat is the predicted timeline for the next Bitcoin bull market based on the breakdown of the one-year moving average?

ABased on the historical pattern that bear markets typically last about 12 months after the one-year moving average is broken, the next bull market is projected to potentially start in Q4 2026, with the cycle low possibly occurring earlier in Q3 2026.

QWhat two key technical indicators does the report use to assess whether the market has bottomed, and what are their current readings?

AThe two key indicators are the monthly Stochastic oscillator (currently around 39%, not yet in the deep oversold zone below 15%) and the monthly RSI (currently around 50, close to but not yet breaking below its key support level of 48). Neither has given a clear 'breakdown then reversal' confirmation signal.

QWhat type of market environment does the report state is historically more conducive for forming a final bottom?

AHistorically, Bitcoin more often completes its bottoming process during a phase of low trading volume, gradual easing of selling pressure, and declining market participation, rather than during a volatile, high-volume sell-off driven by events like forced liquidations.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

The article explores why the U.S. lacks large-scale consumer credit products like China's "Huabei" and "Jiebei," despite having a developed financial sector. Key reasons include: 1. **Structural Barriers**: A fragmented federal and state regulatory system, reinforced by post-2008 reforms like the Dodd-Frank Act, raises compliance costs and protects traditional banks, stifling fintech innovation. 2. **Credit Card Dominance**: Credit cards, used by 70-80% of adults, form a $1.28 trillion debt market with high APRs (avg. 22.3%). This system cross-subsidizes users who pay in full with those carrying balances, creating a predatory yet entrenched ecosystem. 3. **Data Privacy Laws**: Strict regulations (e.g., FCRA, CCPA) prevent tech giants from leveraging behavioral data for credit scoring, unlike in China where such data fuels fintech models. 4. **Capital Market Disincentives**: Wall Street penalizes tech firms entering finance due to lower valuations associated with heavy regulation and risk, as seen in Apple’s failure with Apple Card. 5. **Banking Oligopoly**: Major banks control consumer lending, leveraging lobbying power and consumer habits to maintain high-cost credit, while alternatives like payday loans (400% APR) or "unbanked" services remain niche or exploitative. Ultimately, regulatory, structural, and corporate interests collectively block the emergence of accessible, low-cost digital lending in the U.S.

Odaily星球日报23 хв тому

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

Odaily星球日报23 хв тому

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

Chinese tech giants like ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent are accelerating the rollout of integrated AI model subscription services—dubbed “model supermarkets”—to provide developers with bundled access to multiple leading domestic large language models (LLMs). ByteDance’s Volcengine recently upgraded its "Coding Plan" by adding newer models like GLM-5.1, Minimax M2.7, and Kimi k2.6, allowing subscribers to use various top models under a single monthly fee starting at ¥40. However, user feedback reveals significant issues, including rapid consumption of usage limits (e.g., hitting caps within hours), frequent server errors (like HTTP 429), and slow response times during peak hours. Complaints about misleading deduction rates—where calls to advanced models consume more quota—are also common. The trend is industry-wide: Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have all launched similar multi-model coding plans. While these platforms reduce trial costs for developers, they also expose challenges in balancing affordability with service quality and computational stability. Amid this shift, independent AI companies like Zhipu, MiniMax, and Moonlight Face (Kimi) are developing strategies to avoid becoming mere “pipes” in this ecosystem—focusing on vertical applications, autonomous agents, and long-context models to retain competitiveness. Analysts suggest that, while platform aggregation may pressure model firms in the short term, specialized and vertical AI capabilities will remain differentiated in the long run.

marsbit27 хв тому

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

marsbit27 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片