Matrixport Market Watch: Crypto Market Repair Window Opens, Structure and Sentiment Warm Up Simultaneously

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-07Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-07

Анотація

Matrixport Market Watch: Crypto Market Enters Recovery Phase with Improving Structure and Sentiment The crypto market has begun 2026 with a positive recovery, as BTC and ETH posted significant gains in the first week. This rebound follows the fading of year-end 2025 selling pressure, particularly from U.S. tax-loss harvesting. Key drivers include the return of normal trading activity post-holidays, the dissipation of concentrated selling, and fresh capital inflows, especially from Asian markets. Macro conditions remain supportive, with the Federal Reserve continuing its rate cut path and lowering the federal funds rate to 3.50%-3.75% by end-2025. Softer inflation and a cooling labor market suggest further monetary easing is possible in 2026. While geopolitical events caused brief risk-off sentiment, they were quickly absorbed as short-term noise. On-chain data indicates strengthening fundamentals: BTC and ETH are experiencing net outflows from exchanges, reducing immediate sell-side pressure; stablecoin market cap is rising again, providing more on-chain liquidity for crypto purchases; and network activity, measured by daily active addresses, is recovering. Derivatives markets signal a clear shift in sentiment from defensive to cautiously optimistic. Implied volatility (IV) has dropped to near two-year lows, indicating lower expectations for extreme near-term price swings. The 25-delta skew for BTC options has turned positive, showing reduced demand for downside protectio...

As the market disturbances of late 2025 gradually recede, the crypto market has welcomed a positive recovery trend in the first week of 2026. Both BTC and ETH recorded considerable gains, with market sentiment and on-chain structure showing signs of recovery from the year-end pressure. This article will analyze the current market phase by combining the macro background, on-chain data, and derivatives market structure.

On the macro level, the core logic of market trading remains the shift in global liquidity expectations. The Federal Reserve continued its interest rate cut path in 2025, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% - 3.75% by year-end. The sustained cooling of inflation and the job market provides room for further monetary policy easing in 2026.

Although geopolitical events (such as the situation in Venezuela) triggered brief risk-off sentiment at the beginning of the year, the market quickly digested them as short-term emotional disturbances and did not constitute a driver for a trend reversal. Overall, the relatively mild macro policy outlook has created favorable external conditions for the crypto market's recovery.

Market Performance: Tax-Loss Selling Pressure Subsides, Capital Inflow Drives Price Recovery

In the first week of the year, BTC and ETH showed a clear recovery-driven upward trend. BTC rebounded from around 88,000 USDT to above 92,000 USDT, with a year-to-date return of approximately +5%; ETH rose by about +6% over the same period. This movement is the result of the superposition of three forces:

  • End of Holidays: Trading activity returns to normal, and market liquidity recovers.

  • Tax-Loss Selling Pressure Subsides: The concentrated year-end selling pressure from U.S. investors realizing capital gains tax losses, which was released in December, significantly weakened at the beginning of the new year. Historical data shows that the market often rebounds after such selling pressure ends.

  • Capital Inflow: New allocation funds and buying interest from the Asian time zone actively entered the market, absorbing the year-end selling pressure and driving prices upward from the post-pullback consolidation range.

On-Chain Insights: Signs of Supply Tightening and Capital Inflow

Changes in on-chain data provide micro-level evidence for the market's stabilization and recovery: Continued Decline in Exchange Balances: BTC and ETH continue to experience net outflows from centralized exchanges, tightening the supply of chips available for immediate trading in circulation and reducing potential concentrated selling pressure; Stablecoin Supply Rebounds: The total market capitalization of major stablecoins has resumed an upward trajectory, indicating that the "ammunition" available on the market for purchasing crypto assets is more sufficient, providing liquidity support for the market; On-Chain Activity Warms Up: The daily active address count on the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks has rebounded at the beginning of the year, reflecting a gradual recovery in user participation and market sentiment.

Derivatives Signals: Sentiment Shifts from Defense to Tentative Offense

Changes in the derivatives market structure clearly reveal the shift in market sentiment: Implied Volatility (IV) at Low Levels: Short-term option IV has fallen to near two-year lows, indicating low market expectations for extreme volatility in the near term and a trend towards stable sentiment; Skew Structure Significantly Repaired: The 25Δ skew in the options market has rapidly converged, with BTC's skew turning from negative to positive. This means that the demand for downside protection (put option premium) has weakened, while the demand for chasing upside (call option premium) has begun to heat up, shifting market sentiment from defensive to bullish; Open Interest (OI) Concentrated Distribution: A large number of option open interest positions are concentrated around key price levels near the current spot price (such as the $90,000 and $100,000 regions for BTC), which will become important psychological and technical battle axes in the short term.

Product Strategy: Adapting to the Market Phase, Optimizing Risk and Return

Combined with the current market characteristics of "recovery consolidation, direction pending," investors can choose suitable structured product tools based on their own views.

  • Expecting Consolidation: If expecting the market to continue range-bound consolidation, consider strategies like FCN/Dual Currency, which "sell volatility" to obtain fixed coupons within a specific price range, suitable for phases where volatility is falling from highs.

  • Bullish on Buying Dips: If long-term bullish but unwilling to chase highs, discounted Accumulator allows for automatic分批 buying at preset lower levels, with knock-out conditions to control upside risk, suitable for分批布局.

  • Bullish or Hedging: Holding spot and希望 to take profit in batches above, or needing to hedge short-term risks, consider Decumulator/covered call writing, the former can automatically sell in batches, the latter can enhance spot returns and partially lock in the selling price.

  • Need Liquidity: If financing is needed but unwilling to bear margin call risk, non-recourse financing can provide low-interest liquidity without margin call risk, suitable for long-term holders.

In summary, the current market is in a recovery phase following the year-end pullback. Improved macro liquidity expectations, tightening micro on-chain supply, and warming derivatives market sentiment together constitute a偏多 market structure. However, prices have rebounded near key resistance areas. Whether the market can start a new trend仍需观察 the effective breakthrough of the important resistance levels above.

The above content is all from Daniel Yu, Head of Asset Management. This article only represents the author's personal views.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the three key factors driving the recovery of BTC and ETH in the first week of 2026 according to the article?

AThe three key factors are: 1) The end of the holiday season leading to a return to normal trading activity and liquidity, 2) The significant weakening of tax-loss selling pressure from US investors after its release in December, and 3) The influx of new allocation funds and buying interest from the Asian time zone, pushing prices upward.

QHow does the article describe the change in market sentiment as reflected in the derivatives market?

AThe article states that derivatives market signals show a clear shift from defensive to tentatively bullish sentiment. This is evidenced by low implied volatility (IV), the convergence and positive turn of the 25Δ Skew for BTC (indicating reduced demand for downside protection and increased demand for upside calls), and a concentration of open interest (OI) around key price levels.

QWhat specific on-chain data points are provided as evidence for market stabilization and recovery?

AThe on-chain evidence includes: 1) A continuous net outflow of BTC and ETH from centralized exchanges, making the available supply for immediate trading tighter. 2) A rebound in the total market capitalization of major stablecoins, indicating more 'ammunition' is available to buy crypto assets. 3) A recovery in the daily active address count on the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks, reflecting improved user participation and market sentiment.

QWhat core macro logic is the market trading on, and what is the Fed's policy stance as of the end of 2025?

AThe core macro logic is the shift in global liquidity expectations. The Federal Reserve continued its interest rate cut path in 2025, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% - 3.75% by the end of the year, with the potential for further monetary policy easing in 2026 due to cooling inflation and the job market.

QFor an investor who is 'Bullish but wants to buy on dips', which structured product strategy does the article suggest?

AThe article suggests the 'Discounted Accumulator' strategy for investors who are long-term bullish but unwilling to buy at high prices. It allows for automatic分批 (batch) buying at pre-set lower price levels and includes a knock-out condition to control upside risk, making it suitable for布局 (position building) in batches.

Пов'язані матеріали

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit17 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit17 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit33 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit33 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片