Market Plunge, But These Crypto OGs Are Still 'Topping Up Their Faith'

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-02-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-06

Анотація

Summary: On February 6, Bitcoin plunged 15.48% to $60,000, marking its largest single-day drop since the FTX collapse. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index hit 9, indicating "extreme fear" and a new low since the 2022 bear market. Despite widespread panic, several crypto veterans reaffirmed their conviction. Michael Saylor encouraged buying Bitcoin as a form of support. The founder of Base emphasized long-term commitment to building. Lily Liu, President of the Solana Foundation, argued that blockchain's core purpose is financialization, stressing the importance of protecting liquidity unity. She criticized the "Web3 narrative" as overly simplistic and called for creating new markets rather than relying on speculative narratives. Balaji expressed strong bullishness, stating that "code-based order" is rising as "rules-based order" collapses, making short-term prices irrelevant. He emphasized the need for on-chain companies and internet-native systems. The founder of Helius shared similar optimism, advocating for filtering out "tourists" to improve signal-to-noise ratio in the space. Linda Xie shared her experience of a 75% drawdown in 2018, advising against emotionally-driven decisions and emphasizing holding assets with strong fundamental belief. Crypto influencer神鱼 (Shenyu) succinctly stated: "1 BTC = 1 BTC." Overall, these leaders urge perseverance, focus on fundamentals, and long-term belief in crypto's transformative potential despite market volatility.

Editor's Note: On February 6th, Bitcoin fell to a low of $60,000, plummeting 15.48% in a single day, marking its largest single-day drop since the FTX collapse. At the same time, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index dropped to 9, indicating a state of 'Extreme Fear' in the market, hitting a new low since the 2022 bear market.

However, as pessimism spreads, many veteran Builders and thought leaders in the crypto world are voicing a different perspective. This 'Crypto Faith Topping-Up List' compiles their thoughts and perseverance amidst the storm. Perhaps it can offer you a sliver of solace and direction to move forward during this market winter.

Michael Saylor:

If you want to give me a birthday present, buy yourself some Bitcoin!

Base Founder:

13 years have passed, and I'm not going anywhere.

There's still so much to build.

Solana Foundation President LilyLiu:

Blockchain was, is, and always will be financial technology. Their core purpose is financialization.

This is also why, when designing a chain, protecting the unity of liquidity is more important than almost anything else.

I'm glad the misguided focus on things like 'chain games' is finally over.

More broadly, the 'read write own' / 'Web3 narrative' is essentially too skeuomorphic and, to be honest, a bit intellectually lazy. New technology is never as simple as 'put something on-chain, and voilà—everything changes'; you must truly create new markets.

The old narrative was more of a fig leaf, used to justify VCs pouring money into various unnecessary infrastructures, hoping to create a private asset that could become 'magic internet money.'

The more projects try to attract prices through narrative packaging and take a share of the liquidity from the 'wild west' of the internet, the harder the 'narrative justification machine' has to work, shaping everything into the 'great third wave of applications'—'everything you do today can now earn you money.'

The reality is, the opportunities are indeed huge, far beyond what even our most creative minds can imagine, but not in the way they've been described over the past few years.

The blockchain journey has always been about finance: providing open financial infrastructure for anyone and everyone on the internet.

This enables capital formation and internet innovation to happen anywhere in the world, allowing the resulting innovation and progress to truly take root. Open finance brings greater economic freedom, and economic freedom brings individual sovereignty and autonomy.

Balaji:

I have never been more bullish on cryptocurrency than I am now.

Because the 'rules-based order' is collapsing, and the 'code-based order' is rising. So short-term prices simply don't matter.

As the international legal system disintegrates, we need not only on-chain money but also on-chain companies. As the post-war order unravels, we similarly need a 'post-internet order.' Nations will fail, and networks will replace them.

We need internet capitalism, we need internet democracy, we need internet privacy.

So we need cryptocurrency.

Helius Founder:

I have never been more confident about the future of cryptocurrency than I am now.

Let the tourists bleed out and leave.

We need to increase the signal-to-noise ratio in this space, and this will achieve that goal.

Trillion

Linda Xie:

I know the current market environment is tough. I hope these experiences can be helpful to some. For me, the personal and professional low point was in January 2018, after launching a crypto liquidity fund, when the market fell 90% that year. Our fund experienced a maximum drawdown of a humiliating 75%, meaning the fund needed to quadruple just to break even.

At the time, many investors chose to trust us (this was after about 1,000 fundraising meetings), some of whom I deeply respected, and I felt I had let them down; some investors even yelled at me over the phone. I was extremely worried about what I had gotten everyone into, including employees. I had also invested almost all of my personal savings.

But we stuck to the direction we truly believed in, and it eventually paid off years later (currently delivering about 4x DPI for investors). Hold onto assets you genuinely believe in fundamentally, and don't make any extreme decisions driven by emotion.

Shenyu:

1btc = 1btc

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the significance of Bitcoin's price drop to $60,000 on February 6th?

AIt marked a 15.48% single-day drop, the largest since the FTX crash, and pushed the Crypto Fear & Greed Index to 9, indicating 'extreme fear' and a new low since the 2022 bear market.

QAccording to Solana Foundation's Lily Liu, what is the core purpose of blockchains?

ABlockchains are, and always will be, financial technology. Their core purpose is financialization, providing open financial infrastructure to anyone on the internet to enable capital formation and innovation globally.

QWhat is Balaji's main argument for being extremely bullish on cryptocurrency despite short-term price movements?

AHe believes the 'rules-based order' is collapsing and a 'code-based order' is rising. As international law and the post-war order disintegrate, there is a need for on-chain money, companies, and new systems like internet capitalism and democracy, which cryptocurrency enables.

QWhat personal experience did Linda Xie share to help others during the difficult market?

AShe shared that her crypto liquidity fund launched in Jan 2018 experienced a 90% market drop and a 75% drawdown, requiring a 4x return just to break even. By sticking to their convictions and not making emotional decisions, they eventually delivered about 4x DPI (Distributed to Paid-In Capital) to investors.

QWhat common sentiment is expressed by multiple figures like Michael Saylor, the Base founder, and the Helius founder?

AThey express unwavering confidence and a long-term commitment to cryptocurrency. Saylor encourages buying Bitcoin, the Base founder states he's 'not going anywhere,' and the Helius founder says he's 'never been more confident,' suggesting that weak hands (tourists) leaving will improve the space.

Пов'язані матеріали

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit4 год тому

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit4 год тому

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手4 год тому

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手4 год тому

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit5 год тому

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit5 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片