Mapping Volatility Through Time: Implied Volatility Heatmaps

insights.glassnodeОпубліковано о 2026-03-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-23

Анотація

Glassnode introduces two new implied volatility (IV) heatmap metrics—IV Moneyness Heatmap and IV Delta Heatmap—that visualize how options markets price risk across strikes and maturities over time, rather than at a single point. These tools help identify volatility regimes, such as periods of calm, stress, and transitions between them. The heatmaps display IV using color gradients, with red indicating high volatility and blue indicating low volatility. Key patterns include elevated put-side IV during drawdowns (signaling hedging demand), tail-risk repricing in deep out-of-the-money options, and regime shifts that inform trading strategies like hedging in low-vol environments or selling premium in high-vol periods. Available in Glassnode Studio, these metrics provide a dynamic view of market expectations and risk sentiment.

Options markets encode information about how participants expect prices to move. With the release of our interpolated IV metrics earlier this year, users gained access to a clean, structured volatility surface across deltas and maturities.

Now, we are extending that foundation with a new set of metrics that track how implied volatility evolves over time: the IV Moneyness Heatmap and the IV Delta Heatmap.

These metrics allow you to observe how the market prices expected movement across strikes and maturities; not just at a single point in time, but across weeks, months, and years.

Explore the live metrics in Glassnode Studio. Now available to Professional plan users for all major liquid markets, with 10-minute, hourly, and daily resolutions.

Explore heatmaps

From Snapshots to Regimes

A single IV curve gives insight into how the market is pricing risk right now. But since markets are dynamic, a snapshot view misses the broader context: Was volatility rising or falling into this point? Has the skew been shifting gradually or did it change suddenly?

The IV Heatmap captures these dynamics by plotting implied volatility across strikes over time. Instead of a single curve, it provides a continuous map that reveals volatility regimes: extended periods of calm, episodes of stress, and the transitions between them.

This allows us to observe how the market priced the buildup to a major move, how quickly fear dissipated after a drawdown, or whether elevated put demand persisted for days or weeks. Such patterns are hidden in a single snapshot view.

The IV Moneyness Heatmap

The moneyness heatmap plots implied volatility as a function of distance from spot price (% from spot) over time. Moneyness ranges from -100% to +100%, with puts below the center line (negative moneyness) and calls above it (positive moneyness). The at-the-money level runs horizontally through the middle. Warmer colors (red to dark red) indicate higher IV, while cooler colors (blue to dark blue) indicate lower IV.

IV is sampled at each target maturity and interpolated across moneyness to produce a smooth, continuous surface. The metric is available at four standardized tenors (1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) with lookback windows ranging from 1 month to the full available history.

Visit live chart

Looking at the BTC moneyness heatmap (3m tenor), volatility regimes are clearly visible: elevated IV in 2021, a return to high volatility in spring 2024 and again around the turn of 2025, followed by a sharp compression into a very low-vol environment (dark blue).

How to read it:

  • Dark blue across both sides indicates a low-volatility regime, where the market expects limited movement.
  • Red bands on the put side (below center) signal elevated demand for downside protection.
  • Asymmetry between the put and call sides reflects directional skew, showing how much more the market is willing to pay for protection versus upside exposure.
  • Vertical color shifts, or abrupt changes in intensity across all moneyness levels, mark regime transitions.

The IV Delta Heatmap

The moneyness heatmap shows IV at fixed distances from spot, a natural and intuitive way to view the surface. The same information can also be expressed in terms of delta, which normalizes each strike by its probability of expiring in the money. The IV Delta Heatmap applies this representation, built on the interpolated IV metrics described in this metric launch article. Deltas range from 5D puts to 50D (at-the-money) to 5D calls, across the same tenors and lookback windows.

Visit live chart

Examining the BTC delta heatmap (6m tenor), one notable feature emerges: during the 2021 bull run, call-side IV (above center, particularly the 5D call region) was significantly elevated compared to put-side IV. The market was pricing in large upside moves, reflecting the euphoric momentum of that period. This call-side dominance is a pattern that tends to appear during strong rallies and is clearly visible in the delta representation.

Reading the Heatmap: Patterns and Implications

Below, we identify some of the primary observable patterns in the heatmaps, describe how they present, and outline their practical relevance.

Elevated Put-Side IV: Risk Hedging in Action

During the recent drop to $60k the put side IVs spiked strongly, shown by the transition to warm colours on the put side as price moved lower in the BTC moneyness heatmap (3m tenor) above.

During sharp drawdowns, risk hedging activity increases. Put demand rises as participants seek downside protection, pushing implied volatility higher on the put side. On the heatmap, this appears as a warm band emerging below the center line where colors were previously neutral, often intensifying to dark red as price falls further.

This is also reflected in rising expected price dispersion. Higher IV across a broader range of strikes signals growing uncertainty about where price will settle.

📈 Trading implications: Elevated put-side IV during drawdowns confirms active hedging demand. If the red band persists, the market is pricing continued risk. If it fades quickly, fear may be receding.

Tail Risk Repricing: When Outer Strikes Light Up

Sometimes the most telling signal is not where IV is already elevated, but where it wasn’t and suddenly is. During calm markets, deep OTM strikes tend to show very low IV because few participants are actively pricing or hedging at those levels. When that changes, and previously dark regions of the heatmap begin to brighten, the market is repricing tail risk.

This is distinct from a general rise in volatility. A broad increase lifts the entire surface. Tail repricing, by contrast, shows up as the warm band widening vertically into moneyness levels that had been ignored. Participants are starting to consider outcomes they had previously deemed too unlikely to hedge against.

📈 Trading implications: Watch the edges of the heatmap. If warm colors begin creeping into deep OTM levels that were previously dark blue, the market is assigning meaningful probability to larger moves. On the put side, this typically accompanies severe stress as participants hedge against outsized drawdowns. On the call side, the same pattern can emerge during euphoric rallies as the market starts pricing in large upside moves.

Low-Volatility Regimes: Cheap Protection, Expensive Later

Extended periods of subdued IV appear as dark blue across the heatmap. These regimes often correspond to consolidation phases, where the market expects limited movement in either direction.

📈 Trading implications: Crucially, low IV means option premiums are compressed. For hedgers, this presents an opportunity: downside protection via puts is relatively cheap, making it an attractive time to insure portfolios. For directional traders, buying options (calls or puts) in a low-vol environment is a pure volatility play: if IV expands, the position benefits regardless of direction.

However, prolonged compression often precedes volatility expansion. Here, it makes sense to watch for the first signs of color shifting from dark blue toward red as an early warning.

High-Volatility Regimes: Income Generation

The inverse holds as well. When the heatmap is dominated by warm colors across a wide range of strikes, option premiums are elevated. This creates opportunities for income-oriented strategies: selling options (covered calls, cash-secured puts) captures rich premiums, and benefits from the eventual mean-reversion of volatility back toward lower levels.

At BTC moneyness heatmap (3m tenor) below, we see an example showing a transition from hot (red) to cool (blue), e.g., the local top in spring 2024 followed by IV compression.

Regime Transitions

The most actionable signals often come at transition points: when the heatmap shifts from blue to red (or vice versa) across multiple moneyness levels simultaneously. Unlike a transient spike that fades within a day or two, a regime transition is a sustained shift in the baseline level of expected volatility.

📈 Trading implications: Regime shifts warrant reassessing position sizing, hedge ratios, and strategy selection. A transition from low to high vol may favor momentum and long-volatility positions, while the reverse may favor mean-reversion and premium-selling strategies.

Vol Regime Quick Reference

What to look for:

  • Color intensity changes: Shifts in the overall level of expected volatility
  • Put/call asymmetry: Directional risk sentiment. Is the market more concerned about downside or upside?
  • Term structure divergence: Compare the 1-week heatmap to the 3-month heatmap. If front-end IV spikes while longer-dated IV stays flat, the market sees the stress as temporary
  • Width of elevated regions: A narrow red band at specific moneyness levels suggests targeted hedging; broad red indicates widespread uncertainty

Conclusion

The IV Moneyness Heatmap and IV Delta Heatmap bring a temporal dimension to volatility analysis. Rather than asking “what does the vol surface look like now?”, you can now ask “how has it changed, and what regime are we in?”

Whether you are a discretionary trader identifying volatility regimes, or a systematic fund screening for vol regime transitions via our API, these heatmaps provide a structured, visual lens into how the options market prices risk over time.

If you want to learn more about our options data and metric offering, or gain access to these metrics, contact our dedicated team today.


  • Follow us on X for timely market updates and analysis
  • Join our Telegram channel for regular market insights
  • For on-chain metrics, dashboards, and alerts, visit Glassnode Studio

Disclaimer: This report is for informational and educational purposes only. The analysis represents a limited case study with significant constraints and should not be interpreted as investment advice or definitive trading signals. Past performance patterns do not guarantee future results. Always conduct thorough due diligence and consider multiple factors before making investment decisions.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the two new metrics introduced in the article for tracking implied volatility over time?

AThe two new metrics are the IV Moneyness Heatmap and the IV Delta Heatmap.

QHow does the IV Moneyness Heatmap visually represent different levels of implied volatility?

AIt uses a color scale where warmer colors like red to dark red indicate higher implied volatility, and cooler colors like blue to dark blue indicate lower implied volatility.

QAccording to the article, what does a persistent red band on the put side of the heatmap typically indicate?

AA persistent red band on the put side indicates elevated demand for downside protection, signaling that the market is pricing in continued risk or fear.

QWhat trading opportunity does a low-volatility regime (dark blue on the heatmap) present for hedgers?

AIn a low-volatility regime, option premiums are compressed, making downside protection via puts relatively cheap. This presents an attractive opportunity for hedgers to insure their portfolios at a lower cost.

QWhat is a key difference between a general rise in IV and the repricing of tail risk as shown on the heatmap?

AA general rise in volatility lifts the entire IV surface uniformly. In contrast, tail risk repricing appears as a warm band widening vertically into deep out-of-the-money strikes that were previously dark blue, indicating the market is starting to assign meaningful probability to larger, previously ignored moves.

Пов'язані матеріали

55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind Rubin's Memory Being Halved

Title: 55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind the Potential Halving of Rubin's Memory. On June 4th, a report from SemiAnalysis suggested NVIDIA's next-gen Vera Rubin NVL72 AI rack may ship with roughly 28TB of SOCAMM DRAM per rack instead of the anticipated 55TB, primarily using 96GB modules. This sparked a market panic, causing Micron's stock to drop over 10% on fears of halved memory demand. However, the article argues this panic is misguided for several key reasons. First, SOCAMM modules are socketed and upgradeable, not soldered. Lower initial configuration doesn't mean permanent demand loss. Second, the primary driver is a severe 2026 LPDDR5X supply shortage, not diminished need. NVIDIA is likely prioritizing rack shipments with available components. Third, with fixed total LPDDR5X supply, using less per rack could allow NVIDIA to ship *more* racks, not necessarily reducing overall memory orders. Micron's sharp drop was also attributed to a broader semiconductor sell-off triggered by Broadcom's earnings, with the SemiAnalysis report providing a convenient narrative for profit-taking after Micron's massive rally. In summary: the report on lower default configurations is likely accurate, but interpreting it as a demand collapse is wrong. The real risk for Micron lies in its reportedly minimal HBM4 share for Rubin, not in potentially flexible SOCAMM demand. The sell-off appears more like a correction amplified by coinciding negative catalysts.

marsbit9 хв тому

55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind Rubin's Memory Being Halved

marsbit9 хв тому

Exclusive from Yingke | Tang Wenbin's 'Yuanli Lingji' Merges with Logistics Robotics Company, and Secures Investment from Zhipu, SenseTime, Jieyue, and Others

Exclusive report: Embodied AI company "Yuanli Lingji" recently completed a new round of financing from major AI model firms including Zhipu AI, Stepfun, and SenseTime, alongside continued investments from industrial backers like Huaqin and SAIC Hengxu. Founded in March 2025 by Tang Wenbin, former co-founder and CTO of Megvii, Yuanli Lingji is a general-purpose embodied AI model company. In a notable move, the company has merged with logistics robotics firm "Atomix" (formerly known as Yuanli Juhe) through a share acquisition. Atomix, which originated from Megvii's logistics robotics business led by Tang in 2016 and was spun off in July 2024, has grown to become the world's second-largest supplier of pallet shuttle robots, with annual revenue nearing 1 billion RMB and over 500 projects globally for clients like Uniqlo and CATL. This merger aims to break the industry's "data deadlock" by combining Atomix's extensive real-world operational data from more than 20 countries with Yuanli Lingji's model training capabilities. The company's embodied AI model "DM0" utilizes a cross-domain training approach, integrating internet semantics, autonomous driving rules, and robotics data to achieve hardware-agnostic, precise manipulation even with a compact 2.4B parameter size. The collective investment from key AI players and the strategic merger signal a shift in the competitive landscape, as major model companies pivot from language tokens to physical actions ("from Token to Action"). The industry is entering a consolidation phase where hardware, AI models, data, and application scenarios converge to scale embodied intelligence, a trend mirrored by recent moves from giants like ByteDance and Skild AI.

marsbit16 хв тому

Exclusive from Yingke | Tang Wenbin's 'Yuanli Lingji' Merges with Logistics Robotics Company, and Secures Investment from Zhipu, SenseTime, Jieyue, and Others

marsbit16 хв тому

U.S. Stock Market Trends: Dow Hits New High, Nasdaq Falls, Whom Did Broadcom's Slap Wake Up?

U.S. Stocks Split: Dow Hits Record High as Nasdaq Slips; Broadcom's Plunge Sparks Rotation On June 4, the U.S. stock market saw a sharp divergence. The Dow Jones surged 875 points (+1.73%) to a record high of 51,561.93, while the Nasdaq Composite edged down 0.09%. The S&P 500 rose 0.41%. The primary catalyst was a sharp sell-off in AI-related chip stocks, led by Broadcom (AVGO). Despite reporting a 143% year-over-year jump in AI semiconductor revenue to $10.8 billion, the company's shares plunged about 14%. This was triggered by its maintained long-term AI revenue target, which failed to meet heightened expectations for a stock that had gained 55% this quarter and traded at a high P/E ratio. The slide dragged down the broader semiconductor sector and the technology板块. Conversely, money rotated into sectors like Healthcare (+3.14%), Financials (+2.67%), and Real Estate (+1.87%). UnitedHealth and Goldman Sachs were major contributors to the Dow's gains. The rotation was attributed to a search for value outside overheated tech names and a slight dip in Treasury yields. In other major news, SpaceX confirmed its IPO for June 12, targeting a record $75 billion raise at a ~$1.75 trillion valuation. Additionally, initial jobless claims rose to a four-month high, adding nuance to the labor market narrative ahead of the key May non-farm payrolls report. The day's action signaled that while the AI growth story remains intact, excessive valuations are prompting a market reassessment. Funds are moving, at least temporarily, from high-flying tech to more defensive and value-oriented sectors. The sustainability of this rotation hinges on upcoming economic data, particularly the jobs report, and the market's absorption of the massive SpaceX IPO.

marsbit19 хв тому

U.S. Stock Market Trends: Dow Hits New High, Nasdaq Falls, Whom Did Broadcom's Slap Wake Up?

marsbit19 хв тому

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

"Old Dogs" Become AI's New Darlings: Revaluing Legacy Infrastructure The AI investment narrative is shifting. Beyond the spotlight on core chipmakers like Nvidia, a new wave of interest is rising for legacy tech companies—Dell, HPE, Nokia, Cisco, Corning, Western Digital—once labeled as slow-growth, outdated stories. This resurgence stems from AI's evolution from model development to real-world deployment, creating massive demand for physical infrastructure. As AI moves into data center construction and enterprise adoption, the focus turns to who can actually build and deliver complex systems. These established players hold decades of experience in supply chains, integration, networking, and enterprise delivery—assets now critical for scaling AI. The revaluation can be grouped into three key infrastructure areas: 1. **Servers & Integration (e.g., Dell, HPE):** They are becoming essential system integrators, transforming GPUs into full-scale AI servers with networking, power, and cooling, then delivering them to clients. Strong recent earnings and AI-specific revenue/order growth for Dell and HPE underscore this shift. 2. **Networking & Connectivity (e.g., Corning, Nokia, Cisco):** As AI clusters grow, high-speed data transfer becomes paramount. Corning benefits from fiber demand for data center links, Nokia is exploring AI-integrated wireless networks (AI-RAN), and Cisco sees surging orders for data center switches—all critical for efficient AI operations. 3. **Storage (e.g., Western Digital, Seagate):** The AI data explosion requires vast capacity. Beyond high-speed memory (HBM), there's growing need for high-capacity HDDs to store training data, logs, video, and cold/archival data cost-effectively. This revaluation, however, is not a blanket endorsement. True reassessment requires concrete proof: AI-driven orders and revenue growth, upward revisions to company guidance, and sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line sales. In essence, AI is not turning all old tech firms into high-growth stocks; it is selectively re-pricing the "old assets" of companies that are mission-critical for building the new AI infrastructure, transforming their legacy capabilities into renewed growth engines.

marsbit28 хв тому

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

marsbit28 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片