Mantra CEO tells OM holders to withdraw from OKX over ‘inaccurate’ migration plan

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-08Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-08

Анотація

Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin has urged users to withdraw their OM tokens from the OKX exchange, accusing the platform of posting an "inaccurate" migration plan. Mullin claims OKX provided incorrect dates and details about the upcoming token migration from an Ethereum-based ERC-20 token to a native Mantra Chain token. He stated that OKX has not communicated with Mantra since April 13, when the OM token crashed over 90%, an event Mantra attributed to aggressive exchange leverage policies. Mullin advised users to avoid relying on OKX and complete the migration independently. The official migration is set to occur after January 15, contrary to OKX’s announced December timeline.

Tensions between blockchain platform Mantra and crypto exchange OKX are rising after Mantra accused the exchange of posting incorrect information about its token migration.

In a Monday X post, Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin urged users of centralized cryptocurrency exchange (CEX) OKX to withdraw their Mantra (OM) tokens and cut their “dependency” on the platform.

“Users should consider withdrawing their OM tokens from OKX[...]. Avoid OKX Exchange Dependency: Complete migration without relying on potentially negligent or malicious intermediaries,” said Mullin.

His warning came in response to a Friday announcement from OKX about supporting the incoming OM token migration.

Source: JP Mullin

Related: BitMine buys $199M in Ether as smart money traders bet on ETH decline

According to Mullin, the OKX post contained multiple inaccuracies, including false migration and implementation dates.

OKX said the migration would occur between Dec. 22 and Dec. 25. Mantra’s governance proposal, by contrast, states that the migration will only take place after the Jan. 15 deprecation of the Ethereum-based ERC-20 OM token.

Mullin also said OKX’s post referenced “arbitrary dates throughout December 2025,” while Mantra has not yet announced an official implementation date.

He claimed OKX has not communicated with Mantra since “the events” of April 13, while Mantra has “helpfully [been] communicating with all other major exchanges regarding our migration.”

OKX’s OM Crypto Migration post. Source: okx.com

During the incoming migration, the OM token will migrate from an Ethereum-native ERC-20 token to a Mantra Chain-native token.

Cointelegraph has contacted OKX for comment but had not received a response by publication time.

Related: Prediction markets emerge as speculative ‘arbitrage arena’ for crypto traders

April crash still casting a shadow

On April 13, the Mantra’s OM token price fell by over 90% from around $6.30 to below $0.50.

OM/USD, 1-day chart. Source: Coingecko.com

On April 30, Mantra published a post-mortem report that blamed the aggressive trading policies and high leverage on cryptocurrency exchanges for the token crash.

“Liquidation cascades could happen to any project in the crypto industry,” Mullin said in the post, pointing to the role of “aggressive leverage positions” on exchanges as a broader threat to investor safety.

Mullin also urged exchanges to review their leverage policies while implementing a transparency dashboard for OM tokenomics, along with announcing the burning of 150 million staked OM tokens, permanently removing them from circulation in a bid to tighten the token’s supply.

Magazine: If the crypto bull run is ending... it’s time to buy a Ferrari — Crypto Kid

Пов'язані матеріали

Access to Active Sessions Instead of Databases: How the Shadow Market in Russia Has Changed

The Russian cybercriminal underground is shifting from selling massive, stolen corporate databases to trading active, short-term access to user accounts, according to a 2026 report. The value of information intercepted directly from infected devices by malware has risen nearly 13% in a year. Attackers now sell packets containing active session tokens (bypassing passwords and two-factor authentication), live email credentials, VPN and cloud storage logins, and corporate network access. A subscription for a steady stream of fresh data costs $250-$300 per month, far exceeding the value of outdated archives. While Russian regulators have successfully penalized companies for data leaks from centralized storage—with no repeat violations recorded after imposing turnover fines—this framework fails against the new threat model. Malware now steals data *after* it leaves the corporate perimeter and is on a user's personal device, a legal grey area. In 2026, 60% of studied web attacks aimed to steal keys for infiltrating corporate infrastructure. The situation mirrors global trends, akin to the Genesis Market shutdown in 2023, and highlights a structural risk: the demand for "fresh" data incentivizes botnet operators to maintain long-term control of infected devices for recurring revenue. This creates a persistent vulnerability layer between personal devices and corporate networks, currently outside the reach of existing regulatory protections.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Access to Active Sessions Instead of Databases: How the Shadow Market in Russia Has Changed

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

SlowMist Flags Fake Qwen 3.8 27B GitHub Repository Concealing StealC Information

SlowMist has identified a fake GitHub repository impersonating Alibaba's Qwen 3.8 27B AI model, which contains an information-stealing virus. The repository, created in August 2026, offered a download file of only 487 KB, far smaller than a legitimate 27-billion-parameter model (over 16 GB). The malicious ZIP file contained a Lua-based script disguised as a certificate, which deploys the StealC malware. Once executed, StealC harvests system data, takes screenshots, and steals browser credentials, cryptocurrency wallet information, and more, sending it to attacker-controlled servers. The malware also includes a backup system that can read new server addresses from the Polygon blockchain if the primary server is taken down. This incident is part of a broader campaign called FakeGit, active since March 2025, which has created thousands of malicious repositories. Approximately 800 of these specifically target AI tools using a method called AgentBaiting, sometimes tricking AI assistants into recommending them. Separate reports detail hundreds of other fake GitHub repositories spreading malware like BoryptGrab and campaigns like Megalodon that generate thousands of clones rapidly. Attackers copy legitimate projects, create convincing documentation, and even list them on public AI registries to appear trustworthy. The fake repositories exploit the high demand for open-source AI capabilities, putting users who run models locally at significant risk of data theft.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

SlowMist Flags Fake Qwen 3.8 27B GitHub Repository Concealing StealC Information

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片