Make crypto games great again? ‘Trump Billionaires Club’ launches this month

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-10Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-10

Анотація

A Trump-themed crypto mobile game, "Trump Billionaires Club," is set to launch on the Apple App Store by December 30. Created by Freedom 45 Games and linked to the TRUMP Coin, the game operates under a licensing agreement to use Trump’s name. It features a Monopoly-style board where players use dice rolls to earn funds for construction and other activities. The game integrates cryptocurrency and NFTs, allowing players to fund accounts with cash, crypto, or TRUMP Coin, and trade in-game items. A pre-launch airdrop of Trump tokens is offered to top performers. However, a disclaimer states the game is not affiliated with Donald Trump, his businesses, or any campaign, and collectibles are for enjoyment, not investment. This launch occurs as the Trump memecoin has dropped 92% from its all-time high, though it saw a slight uptick following the game's announcement.

A Trump-themed crypto mobile game, created by Bill Zanker, a member of the team that helped launch the official Trump memecoin and various NFT collections, is reportedly set to be released on the Apple App Store before the end of the year.

The game uses Trump’s name under a licensing agreement and is being created by Freedom 45 Games, according to the game’s website. It is also tied in with the Trump Coin.

The Apple App Store has an expected release date of Dec. 30, and the app is currently in pre-registration.

Zanker was already linked to a project blending gaming and cryptocurrency elements in April, with the project reportedly bearing some similar aspects to MONOPOLY GO; however, at the time, a spokesperson denied any similarity to Monopoly.

On the game’s website, it lists cash, cryptocurrency, or TRUMP Coin as ways to fund a game account and mentions trading non-fungible token statues and pins that can be used in the game.

Source: TrumpMeme

However, a disclaimer outlines that it’s not designed, manufactured, or distributed by US President Donald Trump or any of his businesses or affiliates.

The Trump Billionaires Club didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump game features crypto elements

A demo of Trump Billionaires Club on its website appear to feature a digital version of New York and show a player using dice rolls to move around a Monopoly-style gameboard, earning funds for constructions and other activities.

The game also offers an air drop of Trump tokens to whoever earns the most points pre-launch, which can be gained by opening an account, holding the TRUMP coin, and referring new users to the project.

Related: Trump’s national security strategy is silent on crypto, blockchain

Trump memecoin is down 92% from ATH

The new Trump-themed crypto game comes at a challenging time for Trump’s memecoin holders.

The Official Trump memecoin launched days before Donald Trump took office on Jan. 20. It surged to an all-time high of over $73 a day after launch — with its value reaching over $14.5 billion — but has since dropped over 92% to trade at $5.89 as of Wednesday, according to CoinGecko. Over the last 24 hours, since the game announcement, the token has seen a 3.4% increase.

Under the disclaimer, the game collectibles are said to be for “enjoyment only,” not for “investment purposes,” and are not connected to “any political campaign.”

Trump’s crypto ventures, and those bearing his name, have come under scrutiny from Democrat lawmakers in the US who have previously demanded an investigation from the financial regulators and the government ethics office.

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

Пов'язані матеріали

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit49 хв тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit49 хв тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1 год тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片