Ledger Targets U.S. IPO With Over $4 Billion Valuation as Crypto Security Demand Grows

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-23

Анотація

French crypto hardware wallet maker Ledger is preparing for a U.S. IPO, targeting a valuation exceeding $4 billion, according to a Financial Times report. The company is working with Goldman Sachs and Jefferies and is eyeing a New York listing, potentially in 2026. CEO Pascal Gauthier stated the U.S. was chosen because "the money is in New York," reflecting a trend of crypto firms turning to American markets. Ledger's valuation has surged from $1.5 billion in its last 2023 funding round. Its growth is driven by high demand for self-custody wallets amid rising fears of exchange hacks and crypto scams, which saw $17 billion stolen in 2025. The company claims to secure roughly $100 billion in Bitcoin and generated hundreds of millions in revenue last year. This IPO underscores the increasing centrality of security and custody in the crypto industry.

French crypto wallet maker Ledger is preparing for the U.S. initial public offering (IPO), which could value the company at more than $4 billion, according to The Financial Times report. The company is targeting the New York Listing and working with major Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs and Jefferies to manage the deal. Sources are saying that the IPO could take place later in 2026, depending on the market conditions.

Pascal Gauthier, CEO of Ledger, has clearly given a statement on why the company is looking at the U.S. instead of Europe in its debut Public offering. He says, “For crypto Money is in New York. It’s nowhere else in the world, and it’s certainly not in Europe”. This reflects the broader trend of crypto companies turning to U.S. capital markets.

Accelerated Growth Following Last Funding

Ledger was valued at $1.5 billion in 2023 during the private funding round. The potential IPO valuation of over $4 billion shows how much the company has grown in a short period of time. Company provide the self-custody wallets, which are in high demand, and institutional fear of exchange hacks is the key driver for the company’s growth. Ledger claims that it currently secures around $100 billion worth of Bitcoin.

According to the data from Chainalysis, $17 billion was stolen in crypto scams and fraud in 2025. As the hacks, phishing attacks, and wallet drainers are rapidly increasing, users are moving towards hardware wallets. This surges the demand for the Ledger and generates hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue in 2025.

Ledger’s planned U.S. listing shows a wider shift in the crypto market. If completed, IPO would place Ledger among a growing group of crypto firms and also highlight how crypto security and custody have become central to the future of the industry.

Highlighted Crypto News:

XRP Slips Below $1.90 Amid Continued Selling Pressure

Трендові криптовалюти

Haedal ProtocolHAEDAL

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the potential valuation of Ledger for its upcoming U.S. IPO?

ALedger is targeting a valuation of over $4 billion for its U.S. IPO.

QWhy did Ledger's CEO choose the U.S. for its IPO instead of Europe?

APascal Gauthier stated that the money for crypto is in New York, not in Europe or anywhere else in the world.

QWhat was Ledger's valuation during its last private funding round in 2023?

ALedger was valued at $1.5 billion during its private funding round in 2023.

QWhat is a key driver for the growth in demand for Ledger's hardware wallets?

AThe key driver is institutional fear of exchange hacks, phishing attacks, and wallet drainers, which have led users to move towards more secure, self-custody hardware wallets.

QHow much Bitcoin does Ledger claim to secure currently?

ALedger claims it currently secures around $100 billion worth of Bitcoin.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit33 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit33 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit41 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit41 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News45 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News45 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit53 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit53 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit1 год тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think