L1 Native Tokens' Final 'Monetary Premium' Is Collapsing!

比推Опубліковано о 2025-12-08Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-08

Анотація

The monetary premium on Layer 1 (L1) native tokens is rapidly fading as stablecoins increasingly dominate as the preferred medium of exchange (MoE) in on-chain economies. While L1 valuations historically incorporated a monetary premium derived from their use as a store of value (SoV) or MoE, data shows a clear shift. On Ethereum, ETH is no longer the primary MoE; stablecoins like USDC and USDT now lead in on-chain transaction volume and top Uniswap pools. A similar trend is observed on L2s like Arbitrum. On Solana, SOL remains the primary MoE due to platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium using it as a quote currency, but USDC is gaining significant traction, especially with new launchpads like MetaDAO adopting it as the default pairing asset. On BNB Chain, USDT has overtaken BNB in trading volume, which had previously been the dominant MoE. The author argues that the market has chosen stablecoins as the superior on-chain MoE. Attempts by ecosystems to enforce their native token as a quote currency add friction and costs for users with minimal price impact. Improved on-chain UX and liquidity are reducing the historical necessity of using volatile native tokens for transactions. The next wave of users will likely use stablecoins, not native tokens, for everyday exchange, further eroding this monetary premium.

Author: Silvio (@SilvioBusonero)

Original Title: The monetary premium on L1s is fading

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews

The valuation of L1 blockchains is a comprehensive reflection of multiple factors: including cultural narrative (Memetics), network fees, security, and the development of upper-layer applications. Among these, the most underestimated is the so-called "Monetary Premium".

The monetary premium stems from the demand of market participants to use assets as a Store of Value (SoV) or a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

Store of Value is directly related to the robustness (lindiness) and degree of decentralization of an asset, so it is not an easy market entry strategy.
In contrast, acting as a Medium of Exchange may be easier to achieve. Tokens can serve as the primary method for value exchange and measurement within the blockchain economy.

This is similar to the role of tokens in the Web2 economy:

Roblox's in-game token Robux, has strong exchange value.
When Meme coins started to grow, people bought SOL to enter and exit Meme trades. As SOL was the default currency on Pump platforms, most traders did not convert assets back to dollars but kept some SOL ready to "ape". A similar situation occurred with ETH during the 2021 NFT boom. A large number of users began using the native asset for transactions, effectively creating the utility of a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

Does the Premium Still Exist?

The answer is: No, this premium is rapidly disappearing. Users are increasingly inclined to use stablecoins for transactions.

Ethereum — Stablecoins Have Become the Medium of Exchange

Judging from the on-chain transaction volume of mainstream tokens, Ethereum's native token ETH is no longer the primary medium of exchange it once was.
ETH's dominance as an MoE is declining, while USDC and USDT are rising in popularity on transaction volume charts and in top Uniswap liquidity pools.

The situation is similar for L2s like Arbitrum.

Solana — SOL Maintains the Lead, but USDC is Catching Up

SOL remains the primary medium of exchange and the highest volume asset on Solana (but USDC is catching up). This is mainly because platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium tend to use SOL as the quote currency, while other platforms (like Meteora) have a mixed situation.
However, new launch platforms like MetaDAO are setting USDC as the default paired trading asset.

BNB and USDT Go Hand in Hand

From 2021 to 2022, BNB absolutely dominated the role of medium of exchange, but then USDT gained market share and surpassed BNB.

The Market Has Chosen the Medium of Exchange — And It's Stablecoins

There is no such thing as "Onchain Legal Tender" in the on-chain market.

Some projects use a "quote asset" strategy, making their native token the medium of exchange, such as Zora and Virtuals. But in reality, this increases transaction costs for both users and projects, while having minimal impact on the token price itself. Ecosystem tokens can attempt a similar strategy through asset issuance platforms, i.e., requiring quotes in a specific token, but this may not be worth it.

The user experience (UX) and liquidity of the on-chain market are improving: the past monetary premium was also partly due to a lack of alternatives and lower liquidity.

The next batch of billions of users will use the same medium of exchange as in real life (USDC, Euros, etc.).

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594034

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the 'monetary premium' in the context of L1 blockchains, and what two primary needs does it stem from?

AThe 'monetary premium' refers to the portion of an L1 blockchain's valuation that comes from its use as a form of money. It stems from the market's need to use the asset as a Store of Value (SoV) and as a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

QAccording to the article, which type of asset are users increasingly preferring to use for on-chain transactions instead of native L1 tokens?

AUsers are increasingly preferring to use stablecoins, such as USDC and USDT, for on-chain transactions instead of native L1 tokens like ETH or SOL.

QOn the Solana blockchain, what is a key reason why SOL remains a primary medium of exchange, and what new trend is challenging this?

ASOL remains a primary medium of exchange on Solana largely because platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium use it as the default quote currency. However, this is being challenged by new launch platforms, such as MetaDAO, which are setting USDC as the default trading pair.

QThe article states that the monetary premium is 'fading'. What two reasons are given for the past existence of this premium?

AThe past existence of the monetary premium was partly due to a lack of other options for users and lower liquidity on-chain. The improving user experience (UX) and liquidity in on-chain markets are contributing to its decline.

QWhat does the author suggest about the next billion users entering the crypto space regarding their preferred medium of exchange?

AThe author suggests that the next billion users will use the same mediums of exchange they use in real life, such as USDC or the Euro, rather than the native tokens of L1 blockchains.

Пов'язані матеріали

I Built Myself an Investment Workbench Using AI

For the past two weeks, I've been immersed in Vibe Coding—using AI to write code from natural language descriptions. This process has enabled me to quickly build functional tools that address long-standing personal ideas. Previously, I had many concepts but found execution too cumbersome. Key ideas included a unified dashboard for assets across US stocks, Crypto, HK stocks, and A-shares; a real-time alert system for price movements; an investment map visualizing sector relationships; and a tool to correlate prediction market bets with news and market data. Traditional development hurdles meant these often remained unrealized. Using AI (Codex, Claude Code, and DeepSeek API), I built four initial tools: 1. A **Cross-Market Asset Dashboard** showing total assets, daily P&L, and holdings by market, with added features for alerts and sector mapping. It's deployed locally for privacy. 2. A **Prediction Market (PM) Monitor** tracking bets on events (e.g., company valuations) and correlating probability shifts with news and market movements. I categorize bets by conviction to filter noise. 3. A **Simple Operations Backend** for managing my writing workflow (topics, progress, publishing). It's cloud-deployed for mobile access. 4. A **One-Click Formatting Tool** that automates converting drafts into various platform-specific formats, saving manual effort. While these tools are basic, they represent a significant shift: AI lowers the barrier to creating personalized systems. I believe individual investors can now feasibly build core systems for: * **Asset Observation** (tracking holdings and changes) * **Signal Monitoring** (watching for key market shifts) * **Sector Mapping** (understanding network relationships within a sector) * **Performance Review** (documenting rationale and outcomes) The power of Vibe Coding is its fast feedback loop. Ideas can be implemented, tested, and iterated on rapidly, turning "want-to-do" into "done." This marks the start of my new phase, where I'll share investment thoughts, tool tests, on-chain operations, and educational Web3 content.

marsbit3 хв тому

I Built Myself an Investment Workbench Using AI

marsbit3 хв тому

Robinhood, the First Stock in the Predictive Market Concept

The online brokerage Robinhood, which previously partnered with prediction market platform Kalshi to offer event contract trading to its users, is now becoming a direct competitor. This shift began after Robinhood, through a joint venture, acquired and rebranded a CFTC-regulated exchange (now Rothera Exchange). Robinhood's motivation stems from the rapid growth of prediction markets on its platform, which significantly boosted its "other transaction revenue." Recognizing that its vast retail user base is the most critical asset, Robinhood aims to capture more value by routing orders to its own exchange instead of sharing fees with Kalshi. It strategically launched its Rothera platform during the high-traffic 2026 FIFA World Cup, successfully processing tens of millions of contracts in its initial days. This move signals a pivotal power shift in the prediction market industry: control over user distribution and access is emerging as a more decisive advantage than the underlying market infrastructure itself. The future competition may increasingly revolve around which platforms control the major user gateways.

marsbit7 хв тому

Robinhood, the First Stock in the Predictive Market Concept

marsbit7 хв тому

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

Title: How to Exit After Asset Tokenization? Author: Symbiotic Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher Summary: Tokenization addresses how assets go on-chain but largely leaves the redemption question unresolved. While tokenized assets can settle instantly, the underlying redemption for assets like treasuries, private credit, or real estate can take from T+1 to 180 days. This gap hinders DeFi adoption of Real World Assets (RWAs). Three emerging models aim to provide instant exit liquidity, differing primarily in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its balance sheet, acting as a bridge during the settlement period. It offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by a single entity's capacity and risk appetite. 2. **Asset-Specific Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers fund dedicated vaults for each supported asset, earning fees. It decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital per asset, leading to potential fragmentation. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (e.g., Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** A shared capital pool supports multiple RWA types simultaneously. Funds remain productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in lending markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market. This model aims for higher capital efficiency, scalability across assets, and serves longer-duration assets like private credit. Key differentiators are: 1) Source of capital and risk bearer, 2) Redemption pricing mechanism, 3) Capital efficiency, 4) Scalability to new asset types, and 5) Composability. The shared liquidity layer model represents a move from piecemeal solutions toward scalable infrastructure, enabling T+0 exits by pooling capital, maintaining yield, and using competitive pricing, thus enhancing RWA utility in DeFi.

marsbit16 хв тому

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

marsbit16 хв тому

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

After tokenization, a key unresolved issue is providing holders with a reliable exit mechanism, as underlying asset settlement (taking days to months) lags far behind on-chain token settlement. Three primary models for instant liquidity have emerged, differing in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single, well-capitalized entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its own reserves. This offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by that single balance sheet's capacity and risk appetite, limiting scalability. 2. **Dedicated Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers (LPs) fund separate vaults for each supported asset. This decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital, which becomes inefficient as the number of tokenized assets grows. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** Independent capital providers fund shared vaults that can support multiple tokenized assets simultaneously. Capital remains productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in DeFi markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market where market makers bid. The article argues that the shared layer model offers superior capital efficiency and scalability. It transforms exit liquidity from an asset-specific patch into shared market infrastructure, allowing liquidity capacity to grow with overall market participation rather than being fragmented per asset. This is particularly valuable for longer-duration assets like private credit, where reliable T+0 exits can significantly enhance their utility in DeFi.

链捕手30 хв тому

链捕手30 хв тому

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

This article analyzes Anthropic's recent conflicts and strategic moves following the U.S. government's emergency halt of its new Fable model, citing national security concerns over potential "jailbreaks." The author argues this incident reveals deeper tensions between AI labs, governments, and the software industry. While critics view Anthropic's safety-focused rhetoric as marketing fear, the author suggests it serves as a commercial moat masking the company's core economic imperative: moving closer to end-users and their valuable data to avoid being commoditized. The piece outlines a coming clash between frontier AI labs like Anthropic and established software companies. Labs need real-world usage data for model improvement via reinforcement learning, creating a cycle where better products attract more users and more data. This threatens software firms who, as Microsoft's Satya Nadella warns, risk having their value captured by a few dominant models. Anthropic's controversial policy changes—initially secretly degrading Fable's performance for LLM development and expanding data retention—are framed as assertions of control, justified by its safety narrative. The company's foundational belief that it alone is sufficiently concerned about superintelligent AI dangers legitimizes its actions, from resisting government demands to shaping usage policies. The author concludes that this alignment of mission, talent, and business strategy is powerful but concerning, as it concentrates immense potential power in the hands of those convinced of their own righteous understanding.

marsbit40 хв тому

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

marsbit40 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси